• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the campaign for Parliamentary Reform fail to achieve anything in the Period 1780-1820?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the campaign for Parliamentary Reform fail to achieve anything in the Period 1780-1820? James Mashhadi There were many pushes from a variety of different social and economic groups, but despite their best efforts no such reform happened. The two major factors of civil war in America and the French revolution enabled the Tory government to ignore any such "radicals" in England and simply use the excuse that they were too busy with war to deal with any such reform and help to turn the image of a radical into one of a traitor to the country and therefore halting any parliamentary reform that could have happened. The environment in the United Kingdom before the events of the French revolution saw a number of a number of changes. As Eric Evans states, "Britain in the early 1780's was already the most advanced nation in the world"1 and that the basis of this powerful nation was land. Land in the early 1780's in Britain was becoming better integrated with commerce and industry leading to a solid future for the British economy. Land was seen by many as the only way to gain certain wealth and therefore all extremely wealthy men (not simply farmers, but also professionals such as bankers) sought to extend their estates, and seeing as "Britain was more open to wealth than any European society"2, this wealth could bring with it political influence. ...read more.


The inspiration of revolution also helped to shape a new generation of lower and middle class radicals/reformists. The initial reaction of reformers like Charles James Fox was joyous as Fox says "How much the greatest event it is that ever happened in the world, and how much the best"3. There was also a motion for parliamentary reform in the House of Commons in 1784 by Henry Flood4; he argued that developments across the Channel had made reform more urgent than ever. However the parliamentary attitude towards the idea of reform because of French revolution began to harden quickly. Evidence of this can be seen through Edmund Burke's book "Reflections on the Revolution in France" published in 1791, which was written in the form of a long letter to a gentleman in Paris. This book was read all over Europe and encouraged its rulers to resist, his opposition to revolution cost him the support of his fellow Whigs such as Charles Fox. Thomas Paine then in 1792 published his book "The Rights of Man" in response to Burke's book, and it is said that "The publication of his Rights of Man is perhaps the single most important event in the history of British Radicalism"5. Perhaps the reason why his book was so successful was because I was written in a vivid and popular style which means it was more desirable to a wider audience. ...read more.


The growing violence also began to become associated with parliamentary reform, and incidents such as the Cato street conspiracy of February 1920 meant that ordinary people saw those who wanted reform as too radical as the members of the conspiracy (5 of whom were executed) wanted to kill the entire cabinet, this damaged any sensible cause for reform that others had. Ultimately the lack of any real mass support both in physical presence and in ideological terms and the increasing government repression under Pitt, along with the government's use of the Napoleonic wars to implement their new acts to repress radicalism and turn it into a shell of its former self all contributed to the fact that the campaign for Parliamentary reform failed to achieve anything in the period 1780-1820. 1 'The Forging of the modern state' p6 - Eric J Evans 2 'The Forging of the modern state' p7 - Eric J Evans 3 'The Enthusiastic Radical Reaction to the French Revolution lacked Mass Support and was Easily Crushed' p1 - Professor H. T. Dickham 4 Born 1732 an Irish statesman he entered House of Commons in 1783 and proposed reform bill in 1784. He died December 2nd 1791. 5 'The forging of the modern state' p71 - Eric J Evans 6 'The Enthusiastic Radical Reaction to the French Revolution lacked Mass Support and was Easily Crushed' p2 - Professor H. T. Dickham 7 The forging of the Modern State p73 - Eric J Evans ?? ?? ?? ?? James Mashhadi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did the attempts to create a limited monarchy in France fail between 1789 ...

    Louis, however only got as far as Varennes, but the attempt harboured fears of a plot involving Austria and increased paranoia of a counter-revolution. The event effectively outlines Louis's total misunderstanding of the revolution and the sentiments of the people.

  2. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    This was also not helped by the idea of separate spheres, a widely held view within men and women, which by nature men and women were fitted to perform different roles. What also wouldn't of helped the women get the support was the use of anti- suffragist propaganda like the

  1. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    This was a real problem for Louis - the first clash of interests. The nobles and some Bourgeoisie argued his power needed to be curbed, and ministerial despotism ended. This culminated in the revolt of the nobles. The revolt of the nobles was a direct response to Louis' domineering and underhanded methods of trying to force through the taxation legislature.

  2. How united was Britain in 1688?

    Specific divisions between monarch and nobility must have arisen in order that matters of policy became a cause of division. Given these projections we can further order our analysis of the unity of the British body politic in 1688. There are three areas of political unity that are of specific

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    So, first of all the reader can see how unfair it is. The poet also makes her feelings clear by the sheer joy she has in telling the employer that she is leaving and from now on she can do her dirty work herself.

  2. How significant was the role of individuals in the changing for the poor between ...

    a utilitarian thus sharing Bentham's view on ensuring the greatest happiness for as many as possible. He was a social reformer and tried to improve public health in Britain, however his aim in this was to make poor relief cheaper for the government therefore lowering taxes and ultimately benefiting his pocket.

  1. Why were the parliamentary armies more successful in 1644/5 than in 1642/3?

    It is said in his years of captivation he studied military text books and manuals. The civil war gave Rupert a perfect opportunity to further his military career and he was welcomed into the army as the General of Horse with his brother, both as experienced and daring soldiers.

  2. Why did Charles V fail to crush Luther?

    The Holy Roman Empire was already a difficult area to govern effectively. Luther's message offered greater independence from the emperor, so that the Princes and Cities were willing to ensure its survival. The 300 states within Germany were each run under individual Princes, Bishops and Imperial Knights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work