• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mohannad Abu Dabat History Essay #2 Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War? The First World War ended in 1918 with the Allies defeating the Central Powers in a war that would be remembered by the whole world as the most horrible trench war in human history. There are a variety of reasons which led to the defeat of the Central Powers, who were at the time Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria against the allies which consisted of Great Britain, France, Belgium, Russia (left the war in 1917), Italy (ex-Central Power) and USA (joined in 1917). Those reasons can be divided into different themes, with tactical failures suggested as the most important, the other themes which are not as important are Technical issues such as new technological advances in the war, Social problems which concerned the public in each nation, Economical difficulties is another key reason for the loss of the Central Powers and lastly the political difficulties in the countries involved in the war. Tactical failures were classified as the most important because it was a huge driving force in the loss of the Central Powers in the First World War. One example is the Schlieffen Plan that was created by the German General Alfred Von Schlieffen to avoid war on two fronts by attacking France first through Belgium and Holland. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, if the German offensives were more successful than the British and the French then there might have been a chance for the Central Powers to win the war. Another reason that can justify the grounds for The Central Powers losing the First World War is the weakness of Germany's allies, Austria-Hungary and the Turkish Empire. Both countries were huge empires with internal problems with diverse ethnic groups trying to gain independence. Furthermore, both countries wanted to go into war to decrease the unrest in the empire, this later backfired on them because by the end of the war, both lost their empires and new nations were set, such as Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Trans-Jordan and Palestine. This deeply affected Germany at the time of the war because it had unstable allies who can break away at any time. Moreover, Germany's allies were considerably weak compared with Britain and France and faced huge losses at different times in the war. Because of this, Germany was always forced to send reinforcements to these nations to help them which affected their own performance in the war. The following measures undoubtedly made Germany a weaker opponent in front of its enemies and therefore it was a solid reason for the Central Powers losing the First World War, which cannot be argued unless Germany had stronger and more efficient allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

By the end of the war, 1918, Germany did not have enough resources and men to fight in the war; furthermore their country was devastated because of food shortages and war movements against the war. They also suffered when their allies pulled out of the war mostly because of internal problems such as ethnic groups demanding independence. On the other hand, the allied countries faced inflation but their problems were not as serious as the Central Powers because they could get financial aid from the USA, which played an important part in winning the war. Russia left the war in 1917 but this issue did not seriously affect the allies because in the same year the USA joined the war in the side of the Allies against Germany and the Central Powers. Therefore it was inevitable for the Central Powers to lose the war. Word Count: 2133 words (without this line). 1 PAXTON, Robert "Europe in the Twentieth Century" page 62, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 2 PAXTON, Robert "Europe in the Twentieth Century" page 92, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 3 PAXTON, Robert "Europe in the Twentieth Century" page 92, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 4 PAXTON, Robert "Europe in the Twentieth Century" page 106, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 5 PAXTON, Robert "Europe in the Twentieth Century" page 109, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 6 The Changing Nature of Warfare Sheet 7 The Changing Nature of Warfare Sheet. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The USSR would declare war on Japan three months after the end of the war with Germany. * Stalin promised to allow free elections in the countries of eastern Europe, which had been occupied by the Soviet army. Roosevelt believed that Stalin would keep his promises.

  2. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    Those in the poverty stricken slums of the cities jumped at the opportunity to go to the country. Obviously in a movement this massive there was a great variation in opinions and attitudes towards evacuation but the underlying intension was similar for most people as they had seen the effects

  1. In two world wars, the richer countries mobilized their economiesmore successfully than others. How ...

    The greater is this surplus, the larger the armed forces and the greater the level of military operations that can be supported. When it comes to mobilizing men, geography (specifically transoceanic distances) did matter significantly in World War I but in World War II, the effect of these was almost negligible.

  2. The First World War

    It also meant that troops could be sent supplies such as food, weapons, ammunition and reinforcements which were vital to both side if the lines were to be held. This worked and the lines were held throughout the entire war.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Popular entertainers went to army camps, Vera Lynn became the 'forces sweetheart', but just as much effort went into entertaining people at home. Wireless programmes, such as 'Much Binding in the Marsh', about an imaginary village, and ITMA (It's That Man Again), starring Tommy Handley, were very popular and carried constant references to the war.

  2. Why did Germany lose the First World War in 1918?

    It has been said that compared to Britain, Germany was less economically developed. The industrial revolution had resulted in comparatively many more people leaving the farmland and working in industry. Britain was therefore able to feed itself better with fewer farmers.

  1. Why did the Central Powers lose theFirst World War?

    Even the Train timetables were carefully synchronized to efficiently transport the victorious troops from the western front to the eastern front to face the Russians. Schlieffen had allocated 90% of the German army to attack the French Capitol, where as 10% were left on the eastern front to stop the expected Russian advance.

  2. In What Ways Did The First World War Affect The Lives Of People At ...

    What will you say in time to come when asked, "Where did you serve in the Great War?" 4. What will your answer be when your grown-up children ask, "Dad why weren't you a soldier too?" 5. What would happen to the empire if all men stayed at home like you?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work