• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Germans lose the war in 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Germans lose the war in 1918? On November 11th 1918 an armistice was signed that signalled the end of the 'Great War'. It also signalled a defeat for Kaiser Wilhelm's Germany. There are three main reasons why Germany lost in 1918. The offensive that was launched in 1918 by the German army failed, then the ensuing Allied campaign was successful aided by the entry of the US armed forces into the war. Then, under the stress of the advancing allies the German High Command made a sudden decision to surrender. The entire picture of the war had changed in 1917,with the entry of the United States into the war, and the collapse and surrender of Russia due to the socialist revolution that occurred in that country. Winston Churchill later said that the American giant had risen in the west to replace the Russian titan in the east. The German high command still believed that they could beat the Allies before America could fully mobilise, so they embarked upon the Ludendorff offensive, in the spring of 1918. Indeed, the Russian defeat could be an eventual factor in the defeat of Germany, as the Germans were very greedy at the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and the amount of land that they took from the Russians meant that they had to keep one million men on the Eastern front merely to guard the territory. Ludendorff's plan, called Operation Michael (Michael being the patron saint of Germany), had been to split the allied forces in two, dividing the British and French armies who were north and south of each other respectively. ...read more.

Middle

The first British attack was headed by over 400 tanks including new, quicker 'Whippet' light tanks and air support. The attack was a complete success, with some German units reporting almost complete 'annihilation' of the German defending divisions. General Ludendorff later described 8th August as 'a black day of the German Army in the history of this war'. It was during these offensives that Allied commanders learnt the tactic of attacking the weak points in the line, whereas they had been attacking the strong points, inflicting high casualties on their own men for very little gain. There was then a succession of short and sharp attacks from the Allied Troops that successfully pushed the Germans back. On the 21st August the British Third Army attacked between Arras and Albert, though success was limited at first due to the caution exercised by the Third Army. Soon, however, the attack was joined by the British Fourth Army; the Somme battlefield was taken within the matter of a weekend. Five days later it was the British First Army that attacked German positions on the River Scarpe. Soon New Zealanders and Australians brought rapid successes to this impressive tally. It was this rapid succession of blows that began to wear down the German army both physically and emotionally. It was now clear that the allied strategy was to launch limited and separate attacks all along the front, rather than the German approach of using a single movement for all of its forces, as in Operation Michael. ...read more.

Conclusion

Every 24 hours that pass may make our position worse...' The lies that had been told by the High command of German success very suddenly became apparent. Soon Prince Max, the new German Chancellor, sent a document to President Woodrow Wilson asking for an armistice based on his 'Fourteen Points'. The German request for the armistice caught many in the Allied chain of command by surprise, for example Winston Churchill and Sir Henry Wilson were hastily drawing up plans for the offensives of 1919. Soon the Kaiser had abdicated and fled to Holland. On the 11th November an armistice was signed and on this note the bloody and horrific Great War was ended. We can see here that there were many factors that contributed to the German defeat in 1918. The failure of Operation Michael was an important point in the weakening of German forces and aided the ensuing Allied counter-attack, which was in fact successful. These factors along with the internal disruptions in Germany led to a breakdown in the German command. This I think is the key issue in the German defeat and indeed for many years German historians claimed that the army had been 'stabbed in the back' by its commanders. The Allied offensive had finished far from Germany and so it would seem that the German fighting spirit was lost; causing the panic in the German command. The other factors that I have mentioned in the essay mainly contributed to the afore mentioned points, for example the entry of the USA aided the stand against Operation Michael and aided the counter-offensive that followed. The failure of Germany's allies precipitated the collapse of German High Command. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    - As the years passed the differences between the Whigs and Democrats became clearer... The Whigs favored an economy helped by an active central gov't,? corporations, a nat'l bank, and paper currency.

  2. "Why did Germany and her allies lose the First World War?"

    Eventually the "Stormtroopers" were worn down from endless fighting and little food. Although a very successful advance was made by the German troops, ironically they exposed their weakness. Sea blockades which were originally set up by Germans to attempt to starve out the British population, worked against the Germans, causing a great food shortage in Germany.

  1. Armed forces.

    No longer would she aim to be the preeminent naval power. In reality, she had also given the Japanese a local superiority in the Pacific region. A superiority the Japanese would use to dismember much of the British Asian Empire.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Reconstruction, which transformed the role and status of black Americans, energizing every other cultural movement as well. At the same time, southern white resistance to the ending of segregation, with its attendant violence, stimulated a northern-dominated Congress to enact (1957)

  1. An Investigation Into the Way in Which Sir Winston Churchill Used Rhetoric During the ...

    Thus, the gist of the speech is to encourage the neutral states to ally themselves with Great Britain and France against Germany. The only time that he diverges from these central themes is to laud Finland for standing up against Soviet aggression.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Awareness of its unpopularity merely made the militia more ruthless. Through the first month the army launched attacks with increasing desperation to crack the LF. In early February Aoun cleared the LF from the coastal Matn, seizing the militia barracks at Dibye.

  1. Why and when did Germany lose the Second World War?

    The Battle of Britain was a series of air raids on Royal Air Force (RAF) airfields and radar stations, in which Germany sought to eliminate Britain's control of the skies in order to launch an invasion of Great Britain (code-named Operation Sealion).

  2. September 11th

    France was a major Coalition player in the Gulf War - yet this time, President Chirac is playing a cautious game, and is not giving any definite stance. However, the likelihood is that France will back a war, because it the most keen European state to resume trade with Iraq and to win building contracts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work