• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The League of Nations Fail To Keep Peace In The 1930s?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The League of Nations Fail To Keep Peace In The 1930s? In January 1920 an organisation called "The League of Nations" was founded. This organisation had 2 main aims: the first was to make sure that a war on the same scale as World War One never broke out again and the second (possibly the most idealistic of the two) was to maintain world peace and settle any disputes without force. In 1939 The League of Nations failed and World War Two broke out. There are many reasons why The League of Nations failed. One was the fact that the League had 2 separate parts one being the assembly and the other being the council. The assembly met only once a year and every member participated. ...read more.


In 1921 it had solved a dispute between Germany and Poland over Upper Silesia, helped refugees after the war and fought against slavery. As time went on though and countries started to recover from the First World War the league lost its hold on power. This was probably because the U.S.A. didn't join the League (even though it was Woodrow Wilson the President of the U.S.A's idea) and without the strongest country in the world it was never really going to be a success. In 1931 the Japanese (a permanent member of the council) captured the Chinese province of Manchuria, attacked Shanghai and took over the province of Jehol. The reason for this invasion (according to the Japanese) was that their railway had been taken over and they had to defend it. ...read more.


The Abyssinian King appealed to the League and the L eague decided that Italy was the aggressor. Italy ignored the "telling off" and this time some economic sanctions were put into use but oil was not sanctioned so Italy could still power its army. Britain and France could have also limited Italy's supplies by not letting them go through the Suez Canal. In the end Britain and France gave Italy parts of Abyssinia but Italy went and conquered Abyssinia all the same. The only thing that the League of Nations accomplished by failing to stop these aggressors was to encourage other countries to see how much they could break the rules. In the case of Adolf Hitler (who broke just about every rule possible) he once said, "if they had tried to stop me at the beginning I would have failed". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What did the crisis in both Manchuria and Abyssinia reveal about the weaknesses of ...

    USA would still trade with Japan because they weren't a member of the League). Collective security didn't apply because powerful countries like Britain feared they had too much to loose by taking action, for example the British colony of Singapore would be under threat in a war between Britain and Japan.

  2. The league of nations - How successful was The League in the 1920's?

    new government would not sign the Protocol because it was worried that it would agree to something that would not be beneficial to them. In the end the Protocol that had meant to strengthen the League actually weakened it. This was because Britain, France and other members of the League were only worried about there own interests.

  1. United Nations: The Wounded Dove

    Even today some people still find the UN's a worthy organization. One of the first successes came in Mozambique. Under UN's monitoring the thirty year civil war had changed from skirmishes on battle fields to legislature. The UN helped initiate a cease fire between Fremlimo, ruling party and Renamo a rebel movement.

  2. Did The League of Nations Have any chance of long Term Success?

    One and could not provide the League with the backing it needed. Also both Britain and France were not in a position to use their finances to pay for an expanded army as both were financially hit very hard by World War One.

  1. Assess to what degree war was inevitable in France at the end of the ...

    economy with an industry that was outdated and fell below the productivity levels of its European competitors. Throughout rural France, young men and women were deserting farms and villages, the increased use of mechanisation and fertilizers created lower demand for farm labour as did lower reliance on domestic produce, and

  2. How Successful Was the League in The 1920's and 1930's? The League of ...

    Countries need to trade in order to function and benefit. Without a trade ban upon a country, they may soon begin to sweat it out and they accept what the League is trying to say. Trade bans seem to bear a resemblance to that of a medieval siege, no direct

  1. Vietnam peace movement

    The drugs became very much an aspect of Vietnam life for the GIs and many took marijuana in particular. In 1971 5000 men were treated for war wounds, but 20,000 were treated for drug abuse. Many couldn't comprehend the American attitudes when they returned.

  2. How Successful Was the League of Nations In the 1920’S?

    Both Germany and Poland wanted Upper Silesia and the league knew that they would both probably fight for it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work