• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the liberal government introduce social reforms 1906-1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the liberal government introduce social reforms 1906-1914? There are multiple reasons why the Liberal government introduced acts of social reform between 1906 and 1914. The obvious reason is that there was a great need for reform(change) but there are also many other factors that played a part in the decision for a reform. This change was really required to help and improve Britain. The reason for this need for change was the poor conditions that all parts of Britain had been left in after the conservatives had been in power. It is often said that the Liberals had to introduce in social reforms due to pressure from the Labour party. This new party was formed in 1903 and had very little major union connections even though there policies were committed to reform Britain. ...read more.

Middle

Up to 50% of people had to be turned down. This made the liberals contemplate how Britain could battle successfully again countries such as America. Because of this there were committees set up to evaluate and analyze this to show that the physical condition males was very poor, as this was the group of people who would be defending Britain for years to come something needed to be done. If Britain would always struggle to defeat. The other factor that made the need seem realistically more desperate was from surveys carried out indifferent places by two very different men Seebohm Rowntree and Charles Booth. The carried surveys out on all classes but were very concerned about the poor. After many years of analyzing and evaluating they calculated that a family of fives minimum necessary income per week for a family to exist at' mere physical efficiency' was 21s 8d. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Liberals therefore had to introduce new reforms to help support their people. In 1906 there were many young and ambitious politicians who became part of the Liberal government. Two of the most important were David Lloyd George and Winston Churchill. Both of these men felt that the state of Britain's poor was a national disgrace. Lloyd George had big ideas about the reform after he visited Germany in 1908 and saw their welfare system In 1906 the Liberals decided that they needed to take action on the poverty of British people. The main reason being that the Liberals were faced with so much evidence of such terrible poverty, hardship and ill health and something had to be changed to bring Britain back to its strong Empire again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a good response that addresses the main explanations for the introduction of the reform programme and considers both internal and external factors. The conclusion could be improved upon. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 20/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How liberal were Gladstone's domestic reforms during his first ministry?

    5 star(s)

    The Ballot Act supported Gladstonian Liberalism more than the administrative reform, because it gave people more free will and there were no hidden limitations, unlike the administrative reform. Another law which helped to improve the country's efficiency and supported idea of Liberalism was the educational reform.

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    In many ways he used a traditional approach to kingship and government. Although he took initiatives in ways of setting up government, he was more concerned with making the old system work effectively than replacing it with a new one.

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    He, like Charles, argued with Parliament over money and, in 1611, did not allow them to meet for ten years. James also used his friends to help him run the country and rewarded them with titles and this further embittered parliament.

  2. Why was Slavery Abolished in the British Empire by 1833?

    Black people were always being bought but owners never created some space in their hearts for African slaves. They thought that Black people were less powerful and were not able to take up huge jobs such as owning plantations and large industrial managing.

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    Because of the failure of the Free Gift, Charles responded with a more direct approach: the Forced Loan, also in 1626. Although it maintained the fiction that the money to be raised from this was voluntary, it was not. Men who refused to pay were imprisoned.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    Ambion hill in the distance, they had a clear view of the hill and Richard had a clear view of them. As Polydore Vergil reports, " sending withal, to Thomas Stanley, who was now approaching the place of fight betwixt the two battles, that he could come to with his forces , to set the soldiers in array.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    The originator of the scheme was Robert Catesby, who took his cousin Thomas Winter and his friends Thomas Percy and John Wright into confidence, along with Guy Fawkes. They in turn drew other Roman Catholic gentlemen into the plot, among them Sir Everard Digby, John Grant, Ambrose Rokewood, Francis Tresham, Thomas Winter's brother Robert and John Wright's brother Christopher.

  2. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    eventually demanded that the issue of Charles' Personal Rule and its various violations of power must be addressed. Neither Charles nor his opposition could reach any kind of conclusion and the "Short Parliament" was disbanded in May. After a denigrating degradation in the attempt to defeat Scotland, Charles was faced

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work