• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Second Crusade Fail? The Second Crusade was called on the 1st of December 1147 by Pope Eugenius III. Initially, it had been addressed to King Louis VII of France and his subjects. The main objective that had been announced was to reclaim Edessa as it was essential for the Franks to recapture this land. Unfortunately, the objective had not been achieved in the crusade; in fact the goal to recapture Edessa was a complete failure. However, although Edessa was the main objective of the Second Crusade, during the course of the crusade the Christians set their sights on Damascus, the Baltic and Iberia. These additional aims came about when they reached the Holy Land. Despite these new goals, the only true success of the Second Crusade was Iberia; all other aims failed (although the Baltic crusade was a success to a certain degree, but only for a short period). ...read more.

Middle

Now the question 'was the aim to recapture Damascus instead worth all the effort?' arises. The answer is simple; it was certainly not. Damascus leads me on to the next point of failure of the Second Crusade. Damascus was a great city which radiated the blossoming Arab race. It had been such a city that it motivated the crusaders through greed, which was most probably why the crusaders could not achieve the capture of such a city - because every crusader had their own goals in mind. This particular city had been too strong for the crusaders to take over, and since the crusaders were disunited by greed, and the such, it was only expected that they would fail to capture Damascus as well. The crusaders did have their chance to successfully capture the city, and that was to continue the seigure of the northern wall of the city, however, the crusading leaders had a fatal change of plan which drastically affected the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Second Crusade also had its long term effects. It created problems for the Catholic Church as it resisted any chance of Christianity establishing itself in Outr´┐Ż-mere and the surrounding area. It had also created a huge loss in confidence among the Christians after such a humiliating defeat. The defeat had caused so much pain for the Christians that many believed that God was no longer on their side and so many Christians lost their faith. In conclusion, to a very large degree, the Second Crusade was a failure. Edessa, the main reason behind the crusade was lost and they failed to reclaim it. Damascus was, frankly, a waste of time (due to their careless tactics which were not well thought out) and finally the success of the Baltic was only for a short period. Iberia was the main success of the Second Crusade and even that is not worthy of mention as it was not even planned from the beginning of the Crusade. The Second Crusade proved to be a disaster and caused a lot of pain for many Christians. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    It was the law of the local churches, made by churchmen in their own assemblies, such as that which Lanfranc had summoned in 1075. Overlooking this was the underlying authority of the Pope at Rome, who would generally agree on the objectives of the local churches, but this complicated the relations between King and Church.

  2. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The conquest had as Gillingham writes "reaped tremendous awards. Richard was able to gain vast amounts of booty which the previous ruler Ducus Comenus had bee storing during his reign." In addition to this, Richard was further able to impose a fifty percent capital levy on every Cypriot. The conquest of Cyprus had thus been fiscally a tremendous success.

  1. Why did so many people go on the first crusade

    did not, and in that sense we can see that there motives must actually have been much more spiritual than was first thought. Another important reason which must not be overlooked is Urban's call to help defend the peoples 'Christian brothers in the east.'

  2. How were the lives of Civilians affected by the Second World War

    He explains how the evacuees were just forced on them, common in evacuation. This often led to conflict, were the evacuees went home due to a different lifestyles/class. The Blitz was the heavy bombing of British cities by the Germans in an attempt to lower morale.

  1. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    is largely based on the profound effect it had on their morale and the assertion that the battle would've been lost had they not been inspired by the discovery. Before the Lance was discovered the Crusaders' morale was low as the city's food supplies had been depleted as a result

  2. Discuss the course and consequences of the Arab Israeli Conflict

    It can then be established that, as Eliezer Ben-Yehuda declared, "We shall buy, buy, buy", and "...the Arabs will (not) know what we are after...we shall act like silent spies", that the Zionists had no intention of informing the Arabs', or being aware of the Palestinian Arabs' opinion on their intentions to establish a Jewish State.

  1. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    British policy changed considerably; it became less repressive, as the British saw that violent repression was ineffective and costly. Henceforth, the Congress was responsible for pressing the British rule for more reforms with nationalist movements (eg. Salt March, Quit India), which was a significant in bringing India independence.

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    group would come away and charge at the enemy, this result in a constant barrage of arrows at the enemy if the enemy charged the Turks would turn and make flight. unlike the Crusaders system, suitable in Western European warfare, the turkish system was specially designed for the middle east, where the flat hard plains made it the perfect stratergy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work