• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Second Crusade Fail? The Second Crusade was called on the 1st of December 1147 by Pope Eugenius III. Initially, it had been addressed to King Louis VII of France and his subjects. The main objective that had been announced was to reclaim Edessa as it was essential for the Franks to recapture this land. Unfortunately, the objective had not been achieved in the crusade; in fact the goal to recapture Edessa was a complete failure. However, although Edessa was the main objective of the Second Crusade, during the course of the crusade the Christians set their sights on Damascus, the Baltic and Iberia. These additional aims came about when they reached the Holy Land. Despite these new goals, the only true success of the Second Crusade was Iberia; all other aims failed (although the Baltic crusade was a success to a certain degree, but only for a short period). ...read more.

Middle

Now the question 'was the aim to recapture Damascus instead worth all the effort?' arises. The answer is simple; it was certainly not. Damascus leads me on to the next point of failure of the Second Crusade. Damascus was a great city which radiated the blossoming Arab race. It had been such a city that it motivated the crusaders through greed, which was most probably why the crusaders could not achieve the capture of such a city - because every crusader had their own goals in mind. This particular city had been too strong for the crusaders to take over, and since the crusaders were disunited by greed, and the such, it was only expected that they would fail to capture Damascus as well. The crusaders did have their chance to successfully capture the city, and that was to continue the seigure of the northern wall of the city, however, the crusading leaders had a fatal change of plan which drastically affected the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Second Crusade also had its long term effects. It created problems for the Catholic Church as it resisted any chance of Christianity establishing itself in Outr´┐Ż-mere and the surrounding area. It had also created a huge loss in confidence among the Christians after such a humiliating defeat. The defeat had caused so much pain for the Christians that many believed that God was no longer on their side and so many Christians lost their faith. In conclusion, to a very large degree, the Second Crusade was a failure. Edessa, the main reason behind the crusade was lost and they failed to reclaim it. Damascus was, frankly, a waste of time (due to their careless tactics which were not well thought out) and finally the success of the Baltic was only for a short period. Iberia was the main success of the Second Crusade and even that is not worthy of mention as it was not even planned from the beginning of the Crusade. The Second Crusade proved to be a disaster and caused a lot of pain for many Christians. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    It was the law of the local churches, made by churchmen in their own assemblies, such as that which Lanfranc had summoned in 1075. Overlooking this was the underlying authority of the Pope at Rome, who would generally agree on the objectives of the local churches, but this complicated the relations between King and Church.

  2. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The strategic position of Cyprus had been vital to the crusade. The superior numbers of the Muslim forces in Outremer had forced the Christians to rely heavily on sea power. Given this the crusader lands had been supported by the men and supplies ferried across the Mediterranean by the fleets of Venice, Pisa and Genoa.

  1. How were the lives of Civilians affected by the Second World War

    Source 15 is a letter from Humphrey Jennings to his wife. The letter would be private, therefore reliable to some extent. Some points may be exaggerated as she isn't experiencing the bombing, so he could be reassuring his evacuated and worried wife.

  2. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    is largely based on the profound effect it had on their morale and the assertion that the battle would've been lost had they not been inspired by the discovery. Before the Lance was discovered the Crusaders' morale was low as the city's food supplies had been depleted as a result

  1. Discuss the course and consequences of the Arab Israeli Conflict

    It is this very attitude that would in fact give birth to the Palestinian Arab Nationalism which the Zionists themselves will consider inferior, but will underestimate as being 'savage culture'. In 1896, when Theodore Herzl wrote Das Judenstaat (the Jewish State), there was not one mention of 'Arabs' or 'Palestinians',

  2. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    British policy changed considerably; it became less repressive, as the British saw that violent repression was ineffective and costly. Henceforth, the Congress was responsible for pressing the British rule for more reforms with nationalist movements (eg. Salt March, Quit India), which was a significant in bringing India independence.

  1. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    But, the Crusader's won all their battles, some in which they were vastly outnumbered, and took cities that seemed impregnable, this suggests that their Military Prowess was the Main factor in the sucess. The Crusaders came from a warrior culture, for them, fighting was a career, so coupled with Pope

  2. In What Ways Was The Siege Of Antioch The Turning Point Of The First ...

    the first land they captured in the holy land other than Edessa that they kept for themselves. This lay the foundations for what would become the crusader states who would hold significant control over the area. This also meant that they had broken their alliance with Alexius.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work