• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Second Crusade Fail? The Second Crusade was called on the 1st of December 1147 by Pope Eugenius III. Initially, it had been addressed to King Louis VII of France and his subjects. The main objective that had been announced was to reclaim Edessa as it was essential for the Franks to recapture this land. Unfortunately, the objective had not been achieved in the crusade; in fact the goal to recapture Edessa was a complete failure. However, although Edessa was the main objective of the Second Crusade, during the course of the crusade the Christians set their sights on Damascus, the Baltic and Iberia. These additional aims came about when they reached the Holy Land. Despite these new goals, the only true success of the Second Crusade was Iberia; all other aims failed (although the Baltic crusade was a success to a certain degree, but only for a short period). ...read more.

Middle

Now the question 'was the aim to recapture Damascus instead worth all the effort?' arises. The answer is simple; it was certainly not. Damascus leads me on to the next point of failure of the Second Crusade. Damascus was a great city which radiated the blossoming Arab race. It had been such a city that it motivated the crusaders through greed, which was most probably why the crusaders could not achieve the capture of such a city - because every crusader had their own goals in mind. This particular city had been too strong for the crusaders to take over, and since the crusaders were disunited by greed, and the such, it was only expected that they would fail to capture Damascus as well. The crusaders did have their chance to successfully capture the city, and that was to continue the seigure of the northern wall of the city, however, the crusading leaders had a fatal change of plan which drastically affected the outcome. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Second Crusade also had its long term effects. It created problems for the Catholic Church as it resisted any chance of Christianity establishing itself in Outr´┐Ż-mere and the surrounding area. It had also created a huge loss in confidence among the Christians after such a humiliating defeat. The defeat had caused so much pain for the Christians that many believed that God was no longer on their side and so many Christians lost their faith. In conclusion, to a very large degree, the Second Crusade was a failure. Edessa, the main reason behind the crusade was lost and they failed to reclaim it. Damascus was, frankly, a waste of time (due to their careless tactics which were not well thought out) and finally the success of the Baltic was only for a short period. Iberia was the main success of the Second Crusade and even that is not worthy of mention as it was not even planned from the beginning of the Crusade. The Second Crusade proved to be a disaster and caused a lot of pain for many Christians. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The amount of men and support for the Third Crusade was never to be accomplished again. In terms of organisation the deliverance of manpower and material resources to the east was as Riley-Smith writes, "remarkable". This can be seen for instance in the organisation of Emperor Frederick's army.

  2. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    It was the law of the local churches, made by churchmen in their own assemblies, such as that which Lanfranc had summoned in 1075. Overlooking this was the underlying authority of the Pope at Rome, who would generally agree on the objectives of the local churches, but this complicated the relations between King and Church.

  1. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    victories were more than just better men, and leaders, one of these expeditions was under the command of Raymond of Toulouse, and these men were as well trained as any of the others in

  2. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    suggestion unlikely to have been followed before the discovery, the Crusaders genuinely felt that God was on their side and the sight of a meteor falling into the enemy camp was taken as another good omen which inspired the Crusaders to fight Kerbogha's army rather than surrender.

  1. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    a "monstrous" event22; this is significant because Churchill was a diehard conservative, who abhorred the idea of giving India independence, let alone concessions. His alarm implies that he realised how the Amritsar Massacre and its implications might weaken the British control of India.

  2. How were the lives of Civilians affected by the Second World War

    The source may be exaggerated, due to the WI being middle-upper class, not used to city lifestyle. Lifestyle was a big change for hosts and evacuees. Towyn Mason in Source 7 describes how in the early years of war it was exciting, but how they soon became suspicious of their strange ways like sleeping in the same room.

  1. In What Ways Was The Siege Of Antioch The Turning Point Of The First ...

    the first land they captured in the holy land other than Edessa that they kept for themselves. This lay the foundations for what would become the crusader states who would hold significant control over the area. This also meant that they had broken their alliance with Alexius.

  2. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    towards the enemy firing off rounds of arrows, when they reached the ranks they would turn and ride along the rank of the enemy firing arrows at the same time, they would then turn again and ride back to the main body of the army, as this did this another

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work