• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did Gorbachev seek to change the pattern of Soviet involvement there?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did Gorbachev seek to change the pattern of Soviet involvement there? This paper will introduce the development of Soviet internationalism alongside the development of Soviet interests in Eastern Europe. It will be argued that the Soviet interests which developed out of the Wars became fixed alongside the ideology behind internationalism. The legacy of Stalinism influenced the development of Soviet policy toward Eastern Europe and Soviet internationalism and the Cold war meant that the Soviet presence in Eastern Europe would persist until Gorbachev. The Soviets could not consider withdrawing from Eastern Europe so long as they were governed by an ideology which viewed the world as two distinct and opposing camps. The development and persistence of Soviet Internationalism Soviet interests in Eastern Europe developed through its desire to end strategic vulnerabilities Russia had endured since Napoleon. The ease of access to the heartlands of Russia through Eastern Europe meant that the Russian strategic meant that the Russian strategic focus lay on securing themselves against the kind of attacks they suffered during the First World War and The Second World War. The Second World War provided the Soviet Union an opportunity to end another strategic frailty-access to warm seas. According to D'Encausse, "throughout its history as a continental power, Russia has dreamed of an opening to the sea and has battled to reach that goal" (D'Encausse, H, 1987, pg. 3). The Soviet Union had grown powerful toward the end of the Second World War with its military straddling much of Eastern Europe. ...read more.

Middle

With one hand Eastern European communist parties were given the right to adopt different paths to development but on the other, the actual power of the communist parties to go against the principle of democratic centralism was limited. The implementation of different paths to communism was restricted because "any discussion of theirs must damage neither socialism in their own country nor the fundamental interest of the other socialist countries nor the worldwide workers' movement, which is waging a struggle for socialism" and "whoever forgets this by placing sole emphasis on the autonomy and independence of communist parties lapses into one-sidedness, shirking his internationalist obligations" (Pravda, September 26, 1968, cited in Gati,C, 1990, pg. 47). Soviet interests in Eastern Europe The foremost reason that the Soviets remained in Eastern Europe for so long despite persistent crisis were because it acted as a defensive buffer against Western European states. The defensive 'glacis' was held to be particularly important in the aftermath of the Second World War and the onset of the Cold War and the arms race further increased the importance of ensuring that western influence was kept at bay in Eastern Europe. The Cold War also established Eastern Europe as a base for maintaining an offensive threat against the west. For Brown, there are three aspects of Soviet offensive strategy in Eastern Europe-these are first ideological grounds in which "Eastern Europe is the advance guard of the world communist movement"; second, its military use "for purposes either of intimidation or actual aggression; finally, in its political use, "Eastern Europe is a suitable base for political initiatives and propaganda designed to manipulate Western Europe and particularly the Federal Republic of Germany" (Brown, J, cited in Vine, R (ed), 1987, pg. ...read more.

Conclusion

is that the failure of Soviet policy to properly impress communist values into the people of Eastern Europe for whatever reason meant that the people were still influenced by western attitudes. The tendency of Eastern Europeans to compare their situation with the west rather than other parts of the Union meant that Moscow became the target for any blame for the economic position. The people of Eastern Europe ceased on the first opportunity granted them by Gorbachev to push for withdrawal from the Union. Whether it was crucial underestimation of the potential for popular unrest in Eastern Europe given these sweeping reforms or a conscious decision to initiate a controlled withdrawal from Eastern Europe is a subject of much debate. The blame for the collapse is similarly contentious. But the underlying reasons for Gorbachev's reform of the relationship with Eastern Europe roughly correlate with the gradual realisation that the reasons to remain in Eastern Europe no longer existed. These reasons overlap with the main area arguments for the collapse. Economically the Soviet Union was bearing the cost of the relationship. Gorbachev had reformed the party ideology as far as foreign policy was concerned by rejecting the Brezhnev doctrine and his new political thinking began to promote the view that the west was to be viewed as an opportunity rather than a fearsome opponent. Militarily the strategic reasons for maintaining control of Eastern Europe were outweighed by the financial cost. Finally and most crucially, the decision not to use force to 'rescue' the communist parties of Eastern European countries from popular unrest meant that when push came to shove the Soviets had no other solution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    But Comecon was only a pale shadow of the economic institutions of the West. * The Soviet Union lacked the financial strength of the USA and the attempt to set up a communist rival led to bankruptcy and ruin. Comecon was a major drain on the resources of the Soviet

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Roosevelt's commitment to lend-lease reflected his deep conviction that aid to the Soviets was both the most effective way of combating German aggression and the strongest means of building a basis of trust with Stalin in order to facilitate postwar cooperation.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    The US Secretary of State George Marshall proposed a plan, which would bear his name. The Marshall Plan was formally unveiled in a speech by Marshall at Harvard University on the 5th June 1947, in which a broad outline of an economic aid plan to Europe was outlined.

  2. Gorbachev(TM)s reforms and policies, which were intended originally to strengthen the Soviet system, eventually ...

    However, though Gorbachev's policies played an important role in accelerating the downfall of the USSR, it was the inherent political and economic weaknesses of the system that existed between 1917 and 1991which caused the eventual downfall and collapse of the USSR.

  1. How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe 1948-89?

    Many Solidarity members are unhappy about this. They see it as giving in to the government. May 1981 ''Rural Solidarity'' is set up as a farmers union. September 1981 Lech Walesa elected chairman of Solidarity. The Solidarity Congress produces an ''open letter'' to workers of Eastern Europe.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Both sides wanted to reduce the risk of a nuclear war. * Despite their traditional hostility, neither could easily forget how close they had come to a nuclear war over Cuba. * In 1968 the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was signed.

  1. Was the cold war conflict precipitated by an expansionist soviet union or were U.S ...

    minister of the tsar, envisaged an Eastern Central Europe, divided into small, nominally independent states, which were essentially Russian clients, not unlike that in Stalin's mind in 1946."7 Eastern Europe was a critical area after the war had ended, Stalin saw Poland as the ideal starting point for soviet expansionism

  2. "The Cold War in Europe brought the big powers into fighting wars outside Europe ...

    E European satellites limited the amount of aid it could send to its allies like N Korea and Vietnam 3. Interests of local players * More often than not local players were able to exploit superpower Cold War interests to compel them to enter into a regional conflict - in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work