• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Tsarist regime collapse in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Why did the tsarist regime collapse in 1917? Although the Romanovs autocratic regime had been extremely unpopular with the masses for years, it had always managed to survive most seemingly decisive events (see 1905 revolution for example). However one Russian became involved with World War One it became clear that the war was indeed the event that pushed Russia over the edge and was the catalyst for the future 1917 socialist revolution. One reason is that the First World War highlighted the deficiencies of Nicholas as a leader. One piece of evidence is the fact that Nicholas decided to lead from the front line in the face of a waning war effort, this was a particularly idiotic move as all it did was arm his opponents as now any difficulties with the war could now be directly attributed to him. ...read more.

Middle

This was bad as it highlighted the fact that Nicholas did not have the leadership characteristics to lead a country, especially during a time of war. This was crucial as the tsarist regime had only survived in 1905 due to the support of the army and without the support of the army the regime would surely fall. Another reason is that World War one highlighted the failure of Russia to become a modern industrialised nation. An example of this would be the fact that Russia suffered a extreme equipment deficiency, this can be attributed to many reasons. The first is that for a country the size of Russia?s they had a far to primitive transport system, and when this had been rendered incapacitated by the German army there was trouble in getting equipment to where it was needed. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it was only the next problems of world war one which caused them to be pushed over the top. This was the ineptitude of those up top in organising food and equipment for the war effort caused widespread shortages in most major cities within Russia (see Petrograd/St Petersburg/Leningrad circa 1914 for example).This was as bread rationing was introduced due to a lack of supplies for the frontline, also there was a lack of oil and gas within most Russian cities. This would eventually lead to riots in 1917 as angry citizens and now disloyal army members took to the streets (shouting phrases such as ?Down with the German woman! Down with Protopopov! Down with the war! Down with the Tsar?) due to a lack of most supplies. This was one of the crucial tipping points within the relations between the autocracy and the people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    Before the war, there were worker protests about wages and working hours. The peasants were also already annoyed at the Tsar because of the land problems. They had to make redemption payments each year because they didn't own the land they were growing things on. They wanted their own land.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    So far, I have already mentioned these effects of the war, and also how the war encouraged them, creating more of a drive to overthrow the Tsar. However, that is not the extent of the effects of the war, even though they are all linked together, as well as being

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Examples of names of exhibitions: "Autobahns of Adolf Hitler"; "to the glory of labor". The paintings were often reproduced on common items like stamps. Lehmann-Haupt argued that everyone was constantly exposed to some sort of officially sponsored art. Result: art declined as the best artists fled the country and the remaining art became stereotypical and mass produced.

  2. How stable was the tsarist regime in Russia on the eve of the First ...

    Riots erupted as the landless peasants had been wakened out of inertia by the events of 1905. Hunger was too common because grain production fluctuated and distribution was hampered by the limited transport system. The record harvest of 1913 was mere flash in the pan.

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    Tsar, and as the commander-in-chief he was to be held personally responsible for Russia's success in the war. This made the survival of Tsardom dependant on military success, and as the war went badly with the army inadequately supplied and weakened morale the Tsar was branded a weak leader and

  2. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution fail to ...

    They clearly had little common ground with the urban working class who worked for them and were exploited by them. These workers had economic aims, better conditions, shorter hours, and better pay. They organised themselves by autumn of 1905 into soviets but spent most of the year protesting in spontaneous strikes and marches.

  1. Free essay

    What Were the Causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution Fail to ...

    This law turned Russia into a police state, and included Alexander employing a special police section called the "Okhrana". It was their job to crush any opposing political party. During Alexander's reign, there were no constraints to the Tsar's powers.

  2. Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

    Although the army were the most important reason for the continual Tsarist rule, the opposition were however disunited and had no clear leader. It can be argued that if they did have even two strong leaders like in 1917 that they would have overthrown the Tsar, all of the opposition

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work