• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and the 1960s? Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Vietnam By Oliver Tavabie 11SB Q1. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and the 1960s? The French had held Vietnam in French Indo-China since the 1880s. However, during WW2 the French were forced out of France and as they had most of their soldiers defending the homeland, Vietnam was vulnerable to be made independent by any resistance group. Ho Chi Minh, a notorious resistance campaigner, set up the Vietminh who fought the French as well as the Japanese who also attacked Vietnam during WW2. When the war ended, the French returned to Vietnam, backed by the Americans who were virtually paying for all of their expenses, and they fought for eight years. After the battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French were so badly defeated that they needed any way out of Vietnam. This led to the Geneva Agreement in 1954 where Vietnam was split into two halves along the 17th parallel, similar to Korea, with the Communist Vietminh in the North and the more Western South. They were supposed to be joined in 1956 but this never happened. In the South his Prime Minister Diem overthrew the puppet leader Bao Dai. Events after his coup made the Americans more and more involved in Vietnam during the 50s and then the 60s. in this essay, I am going to try and identify some of the main reasons why the Americans did become more and more involved in the war during the 50s and the 60s. The first reason is the contrasting ideologies of Communism of the Vietminh and of Capitalism of the USA. Capitalism attempts to make the individual richer whereas Communism tries to make the state richer. They are at opposite ends of the spectrum which has always made the two wary of each other, particularly the Russians and Americans. These conflicting ideologies caused a great deal of historical suspicion which made the Americans extremely distrusting of Communists in general, eg the Russians pulling out of WW1, which led to the beginning of the 'Cold War'. ...read more.

Middle

They also were given weapons from the aforementioned but there was not enough of them and there were few people skilled to use them fighting for the North Vietnamese. However, they had a knowledge of the land and its topography which they used to great affect in attacking the Americans through guerrilla warfare tactics. This allowed them to lay booby traps for the American soldiers to fall for. The difference in aims between the two sides also affected their tactics as the Americans wished to get the Vietcong out of South Vietnam and nothing more than that whereas the Vietcong and NVA wished to fully take over Vietnam. This worked in the Vietcong's and NVA' s favour eventually as this caused low moral in the American's fighting as they were sent to get the North Vietnamese out of South Vietnam and they were just going through South Vietnam, burning all of the South Vietnamese villages and killing the South Vietnamese men and women. I am now going to compare and contrast and explain the differences between each sides military tactics in the 1960s and early 1970s. I am going to start first with the Vietcong's and the NVA' s tactics as they contributed to the American's tactics which were caused partially by reacting to Vietcong and NVA tactics. The Vietcong tried to always fight using guerrilla tactics. This is when small groups of men fight a war where they are rarely seen but kill the opposition by picking off a few men at a time. They used this form of tactics because if they fought the Americans in a conventional open air war, they would most definitely lose due to the fact they have less economic strength to buy weapons or produce them and they did not have the scientific expertise to create new weapons. Also, they knew that they had a superior knowledge of the land than the Americans so they could lay booby traps, eg holes covered with leaves, and catch the unsuspecting American army out. ...read more.

Conclusion

The latter included the infamous Agent Orange which stripped forests bare of leaves. It also contaminated any people who were exposed to it, including Americans handling it at the base. The American General, Westmoreland, began to talk publicly of a war of attrition. This is where the Americans would try and kill more men than they would lose. However, this policy was a total failure as the Tet offensive proved. Even though the North Vietnamese were badly damaged, so were the Americans and the US citizens could not accept this. The US civilians also were not pleased by the fact that they had been lied to for the last few years as the Americans had obviously not been winning the war but more like drawing it. This caused public opinion in the United States to plummet about Vietnam. This caused radical changes in the policies of America. Under Nixon, they began a policy of Vietnamization in 1969. This was the policy of handing the war back to the South Vietnamese to fight for themselves. However, this did not stop the Americans from having one last effort to influence the war when they attacked Cambodia in order to root out any NVA camps and to disrupt the Ho Chi Minh trail thus causing problems to the Vietcong in the forests. They then entered a period where they were trying to encourage a peace agreement imbetween the South Vietnamese and the North Vietnamese as they wanted this war to finish as quickly as possible as it was greatly affecting them economically. Every time it stalled, they launched a huge bombing campaign. They eventually reached a ceasefire in 1972. In the period 1972-1975, the Americans completed Vietnamization so there were no more American troops in Vietnam which was a great mistake as it allowed the North Vietnamese to mount a huge offensive that destroyed the South Vietnamese resistance and let the Communists have the entire of Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the USA become involved in the Korean War in the years 1950-53?

    US went to war in Korea to protect their economic interests in Japan. The K war made it justifiable for the US to retain their military bases in Japan. Furthermore J was identified by Kennan as one of the five military-industrial world powers which must remain within US orbit.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    a more independent people, no longer happy to be taken advantage of by America. This would cause trade prices to rise for America and any other country doing trade with S. Asia. America could not run the risk of letting spreading communism compromise their dominant position in world trade.

  1. Why did North Korea invade South Korea in June 1950, and why did USA ...

    In the Second World War, the allies needed America's help to win the war. Therefore they got the title of "World Policemen". The lessons learnt from the 1930's were that appeasement did not work as proven in the Second World War.

  2. How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early ...

    In general, I believe that life for women definitely improved under the Communists. There was still quite a way to go, but Communist policy in this area was in many ways quite prescient. Landlords and businessmen probably came off the worst under the Communists.

  1. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    had already been reached, and Mao had deemed the ideological differences to great to even consider that a new leader might change affairs, which turned out to be true.

  2. Assess the reasons why the USA intervened in Korea 1950 to 1953.

    The United Nations gave military command in Korea to the US President, who, in turn, gave it to General Douglas MacArthur. The initial US/UN was a clear success, having advanced to the Pusan perimeter, MacArthur's bravura Inchon landings sent the North Koreans into disarray.

  1. Describe the military tactics and weapons used by both the USA and the Vietcong ...

    This shows how smart the VC were in their planning of tactics, they responded to the violence of the US by winning the hearts and minds of the peasants(which is one of the things the US aimed to do in the first place through offering humanitarian aid etc.-this is called Pacification).

  2. Explain why the US withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973?

    with the great communist powers-Russia had already introduced bombing limitations and the US didn't want to be seen to ignore them and upset the USSR. There was progress being made with the USSR to slow down the Arms Race which was seen as a step towards better relations, although the war kept weapon stocks high.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work