• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great Britain and France in August 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great Britain and France in August 1939? A. Plan of Investigation As the Great Purges were nearing an end Stalin had gained more freedom to pursue foreign policy goals, as internal opposition had been dealt with. In 1939, the USSR was having simultaneous talks of a possible political military alliance with the British and the French on one hand and Nazi Germany on the other. This investigation seeks to determine why Stalin's Soviet Union chose to side with the Germans, who's fascist ideology, was seemingly incompatible with the Soviet ideology of Communism. Firstly this investigation will seek to establish Stalin's foreign policy objectives in the late 1930s, and then it will go on to determine, why an agreement with Germany was best suited to fulfill these objectives. The primary time frame that this investigation will consider will span from the Munich Conference in September 1938, to the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939. Word Count-144 words B. Summary of Evidence o In 1936, during an interview Stalin stated that that the USSR does not have territorial ambitions.1 o Excerpts from contemporary Soviet literature2: 'We shall go to the Genghis river, We will fall in fierce battles, So from Japan to England, Brightly can my homeland shine.' -Pavel Kogan 'There will be only a Soviet nation And one - Soviet people.' ...read more.

Middle

The source's value for shedding insight on Soviet foreign relations lies in the fact, that the author, a diplomat himself has compiled much of the evidence from personal contact with figures from diplomatic circles of the time period. Thus, the source has detailed information about Soviet international relations, which may not have been available to other historians at the time of the writing. The author also draws much information from his interviews of Hans von Herwarth, 'known affectionately in diplomatic circles as Johnnie'12, who was a diplomat in the German Embassy in Moscow in the 1930s and was present at the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. However, herein in lies the source's weakness, as Vulfson seems to have grown sympathetic towards Johnnie and his colleagues, and at times overstates their importance in the events of 1939. Radzinsky, Edvard. 1997. Stalins. Riga. Zvaigzne ABC, 2004. Edvard Radzinsky's Stalin is a study of Stalin's life and his ascension in politics. Since the author is Russian and has had access to archives that may have been denied to many foreign historians, such as the Archive of the President of the Russian Federation (Former personal archive of Stalin), the Former Archive of the Central Party and the State Archive of the Russian Federation (Former Central State Archive of the October Revolution). The author's fascination by Stalin's phenomenal character and personality cult, is a central aspect of the book, which hints of Russian neo-nationalism, and the author may perhaps have over glorified Stalin's role and value as a historical figure in some respects. ...read more.

Conclusion

Prior to this, their attitude towards the Russians can be viewed as being unserious e.g. the symbolic nature of the French-Russian treaty over Czechoslovakia was best demonstrated in Stalin's absence in Munich. Stalin was clearly upset by this, as he called a Politburo meeting in the middle of the night. Furthermore, Stalin knew that the West were distrustful of him, and Germany and Russia had enjoyed successful military and economic cooperation in the past, thus at least in the short term an agreement with the Germans was the safer move. Word Count-571 words E. Conclusion Stalin's foreign policy in the late 1930s 'remained one of fence sitting'14 It is clear that he skillfully manipulated with both parties, to ultimately push them into offering the terms most beneficial for the USSR. Ideological differences were not seen as an obstacle to diplomatic relations in the short term, where land and power were to be gained, especially since any Party members who would object to this had been removed during the Great Purges. The main reasons for Stalin's reconciliation with Hitler lay in the fact that, such rapprochement helped Russia avoid a two front war, allowed it to enter the war late at a strong position, whilst it had rebuilt its forces and the other nations were slowly being exhausted by the fighting. Moreover, a pact with Germany granted Russia a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, thus enabling the Communists to acquire more territory and spread their ideology. Word Count-151 words F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    He is always fully aware of the significant differences, Bullock points out that, "They came from dissimilar backgrounds, national traditions and civil loyalties,"8 But what he manages to do find common characteristics that transcend the obvious disparities in their origins and nature.9 The importance of Bullock's book is he explains

  2. Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    He believed Hitler was neither prepared nor foolish enough to attempt a war in two fronts, so persuading the german F�hrer into a peace treaty might rather make him attempt a war in western Europe- at least for a while.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    middle men, there is also a danger that her dislike for a character personally may lead to the assumption that they must be causing the terror. Alliluyeva feels that 'the spell cast by this terrifying evil genius (Beria) on my father was extremely powerful and it never failed to work'.

  2. A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather ...

    Britain and France too feeble of a purpose to make reliable allies. In the winter of 1938-9 the Russians were in no state to withstand a German attack if the war was coming closer. Stalin feared that Russia would again be 'beaten for her backwardness'.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    Stalin adopted the view that it did not matter if prisoners and workers died working whether from excursion, starvation or the lack of health and safety with many workers dying in accidents, the only important factor Stalin was interested in was that the project was finished and finished on time.

  2. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    In June 1938, an opinion poll recorded that 84% of the British public were in favour of a military alliance between Britain, France and the USSR. Chamberlain however, did not want an alliance with Russia; he was ideologically opposed to Communist Russia, and probably had more in common with a dictatorship like Hitler's.

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    These unrealistic pressures that were placed upon factories and factory managers led to a great deal of things. Morale sunk lower and lower as targets were consistently not met, and many goods were ruined through over-speeding the work on them.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The private enterprise part meant that some people were making a profit out of other?s labour. This went against the principle of public good and of Socialism. 2. Economic divisions meant class differences increased: the new bourgeoisie were formed (these people were enemies of Socialism).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work