• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great Britain and France in August 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great Britain and France in August 1939? A. Plan of Investigation As the Great Purges were nearing an end Stalin had gained more freedom to pursue foreign policy goals, as internal opposition had been dealt with. In 1939, the USSR was having simultaneous talks of a possible political military alliance with the British and the French on one hand and Nazi Germany on the other. This investigation seeks to determine why Stalin's Soviet Union chose to side with the Germans, who's fascist ideology, was seemingly incompatible with the Soviet ideology of Communism. Firstly this investigation will seek to establish Stalin's foreign policy objectives in the late 1930s, and then it will go on to determine, why an agreement with Germany was best suited to fulfill these objectives. The primary time frame that this investigation will consider will span from the Munich Conference in September 1938, to the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939. Word Count-144 words B. Summary of Evidence o In 1936, during an interview Stalin stated that that the USSR does not have territorial ambitions.1 o Excerpts from contemporary Soviet literature2: 'We shall go to the Genghis river, We will fall in fierce battles, So from Japan to England, Brightly can my homeland shine.' -Pavel Kogan 'There will be only a Soviet nation And one - Soviet people.' ...read more.

Middle

The source's value for shedding insight on Soviet foreign relations lies in the fact, that the author, a diplomat himself has compiled much of the evidence from personal contact with figures from diplomatic circles of the time period. Thus, the source has detailed information about Soviet international relations, which may not have been available to other historians at the time of the writing. The author also draws much information from his interviews of Hans von Herwarth, 'known affectionately in diplomatic circles as Johnnie'12, who was a diplomat in the German Embassy in Moscow in the 1930s and was present at the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. However, herein in lies the source's weakness, as Vulfson seems to have grown sympathetic towards Johnnie and his colleagues, and at times overstates their importance in the events of 1939. Radzinsky, Edvard. 1997. Stalins. Riga. Zvaigzne ABC, 2004. Edvard Radzinsky's Stalin is a study of Stalin's life and his ascension in politics. Since the author is Russian and has had access to archives that may have been denied to many foreign historians, such as the Archive of the President of the Russian Federation (Former personal archive of Stalin), the Former Archive of the Central Party and the State Archive of the Russian Federation (Former Central State Archive of the October Revolution). The author's fascination by Stalin's phenomenal character and personality cult, is a central aspect of the book, which hints of Russian neo-nationalism, and the author may perhaps have over glorified Stalin's role and value as a historical figure in some respects. ...read more.

Conclusion

Prior to this, their attitude towards the Russians can be viewed as being unserious e.g. the symbolic nature of the French-Russian treaty over Czechoslovakia was best demonstrated in Stalin's absence in Munich. Stalin was clearly upset by this, as he called a Politburo meeting in the middle of the night. Furthermore, Stalin knew that the West were distrustful of him, and Germany and Russia had enjoyed successful military and economic cooperation in the past, thus at least in the short term an agreement with the Germans was the safer move. Word Count-571 words E. Conclusion Stalin's foreign policy in the late 1930s 'remained one of fence sitting'14 It is clear that he skillfully manipulated with both parties, to ultimately push them into offering the terms most beneficial for the USSR. Ideological differences were not seen as an obstacle to diplomatic relations in the short term, where land and power were to be gained, especially since any Party members who would object to this had been removed during the Great Purges. The main reasons for Stalin's reconciliation with Hitler lay in the fact that, such rapprochement helped Russia avoid a two front war, allowed it to enter the war late at a strong position, whilst it had rebuilt its forces and the other nations were slowly being exhausted by the fighting. Moreover, a pact with Germany granted Russia a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, thus enabling the Communists to acquire more territory and spread their ideology. Word Count-151 words F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    his friends who thought Britain and France were sincere in the negotiations which were taking place. The British and French did not exhibit any hastiness, at any rate. When they sent a military mission to Moscow in August, it went by leisurely boat.

  2. Russian Nationalism and the Soviet Revolution

    By the eighteenth century, the principality of Muscovy had become the huge Russian Empire, stretching from Poland eastward to the Pacific Ocean. Size and military might made Russia a major power, but its acquisition of large territories inhabited by non-Russian peoples began an enduring pattern of nationality problems.

  1. The people(TM)s community(TM). How far did Nazi policies between 1933 and 1939 go ...

    They were people who didn't fit into the Aryan way of life they were called the Gemeinschaftsunf�hig. The mentally ill was anybody who suffered from schizophrenia to hereditary epilepsy to serious physical deformities to alcoholics. They were seen as 'burdens on the community'.

  2. To what extent was Britain and France responsible for the fall of Poland in ...

    Although Marxists recognise that religion does have this effect, they see the fundamental aspects of capitalist society as a negative system, therefore any institution which works to maintain its stability is damaging. For Marx, religion serves as a form of social control which prevents the exploited working class from understanding the true nature of society.

  1. Were the 1930's the Devils Decade or The Dawn of Affluence?

    Therefore women could get jobs, but by doing this they would have to get a low paid job and sacrifice their widowers pension, thus widowers faced a double edged sword, either way they would be subjected to abject poverty. The elderly, widowers and children were not the only victms of

  2. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    This new system did benefit the sans culottes and the rural poor because taxation was no longer their burden and the system was fairer than the ancient regime. Overall, the bourgeoisie had gained the most from the National Assemblies new administration.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Farming was individual which made it difficult for the Communist Party to control what went on in the countryside. Stalin was unable to reach most peasants through propaganda as two-thirds of them were illiterate. The GPU (secret police) collected lists of peasant complaints.

  2. Assess the view that Stalin's policy in Eastern Europe was motivated more by spreading ...

    It also fails to recognise that many Eastern European countries supposedly believing that Communism was the only way forward, in fact attended a conference on the Marshall Plan and before Stalin used his power and influence, they were ready to subscribe to a more open economic policy in order to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work