• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the West Saxons find it so difficult to deal with the Viking threat in the years 870-878

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Why did the West Saxons find it so difficult to deal with the Viking threat in the years 870?878? Throughout the years 870-878 the West Saxons were constantly seen to be fighting against the Viking threat and in these years it highlights the immense difficulty in which they faced trying to stop the Viking attacks. There are many factors to why the West Saxons found it difficult for example, their lack of defence and the fact that they had no strategy- adding to their naivety of Viking deceit, Viking tactics- their awareness of the Saxon culture, also their establishment of fortified camps and the leadership skills of Guthrum and Alfred. One contributing factor to why the West Saxons found it so difficult to deal with the Viking threat throughout 870-878 was their lack of defence and the fact that they had no standing army; also their naivety of Viking deceit. ...read more.

Middle

The Viking?s were perhaps able to lure to Saxons to where there wanted- outside of their fortified camp which gave them an advantage also. This implicates the naivety of the West Saxons as they initially thought they had won the battle which meant that they were led into a false sense of victory, however they majorly undermined the Viking?s ability which ties in with their lack of a defence system also. They were thoroughly unprepared for the counter-attack. During the years the West Saxons were also extremely naive in the way that they did not seem to learn from past mistakes which could ultimately be seen as good tactics such as at the battle of Ashdown in 871. They were victorious at the Battle but it is unclear whether this was deliberate. This is due to the fact that Alfred led his part of the fyrd and was then seen dealing with the entire Viking army by himself because his brother, King Aethelred was busy finishing prayers before joining Alfred in battle. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another factor that contributes to why the West Saxons found it difficult to deal with the Viking threat in the years 870-878 is the tactics of the Viking?s as far as their familiarity of the Saxon culture and their establishment of fortified camps are concerned. The Viking?s were seen to be extremely aware of the West Saxon liturgical calendar which added to their strength and one of the reasons why the West Saxons found it so difficult to overcome them. The Viking?s were able to use this awareness/ understanding to their advantage in Chippenham in 878 when they stormed on Alfred?s court who was celebrating the twelfth day of Christmas. The Viking?s were able to take Alfred and his forces completely by surprise and Alfred being completely unprepared for the attack which lay ahead. This surprise attack also exposed the weakness of the King and how he was unable to defend his kingdom. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    He primarily looked to strengthen the Navy so as to ensure protection from any potential invaders, as well as discouraging any raids from Northumbrian Vikings. Alfred in fact, designed and implemented the construction of an innovative style of ship that was 'swifter, steadier and also more responsive than the others'3.

  2. Consider David Starkey(TM)s and Francis Pryor(TM)s respective versions of the nature and extent of ...

    However, while these might be much more reliable, they can only suggest possibilities for what happened. What few have failed to grasp in that the only way to approach this problem is to use both and see where they compliment and contradict each other and try and build a picture from then onwards.

  1. How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

    He wrote, "The more management, or command, became methodized, the more dehumanized each grew; the worker, or the soldier, becoming a cog in a vast soulless machine was de-spiritualized", to powerfully link the change in leadership to this most detrimental psychological consequence upon the soldiers who actually fought for their countries.

  2. Islam's Effect on the West

    Soon after the death of the Muslim prophet and leader Muhammad, the Muslim Caliphates experienced a rapid expansion in size and became to be known as the Muslim Empire, which stretched from Iberian Peninsula, Italy, North Africa, The Middle East, Central Asia, to northwest India.

  1. how effectively did francis i deal with calvanism

    Protestants believe that the Roman Catholic Church is going about Christian religion all wrong. They believe that a lot of the practices that the Catholic Church bides by are absolutely unnecessary. And that the Catholic Church does not follow the bible like they should and that the Roman Catholic Church is far too corrupt.

  2. Using appropriate evidence, describe daily life in either Dublin or Waterford in the Viking ...

    This has been dated to 920 A.D These houses once they are no use; are knocked down immediately and a new house is built on top of the old one (Rosedahl 1982, 231). People of Viking Age Dublin were very skilled and well-crafted trades people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work