• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917? Tsarism in Russia faced many difficulties throughout much of its late history; from the assassination of Alexander II and the similar attempts on Alexander III, to the downfall of the Romanov dynasty and the final abdication of the Tsar. There were, however, two main revolts against the Tsarist government; these were the 1905 revolution and the February revolution of 1917. The first of these predominantly failed to make any major changes to the government for lack of organisation and coordination of the rebel forces and the persistently loyal military forces of the Tsar. The latter of these, however, resulted in major political revolution and a brand new government. To determine why each revolution either failed or succeeded, an investigation into how and why they transpired is necessary. The purpose of the protestors and demonstrations outside the Winter Palace on January 22nd 1905 was not to set off the chain of events that would later become ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore the October Manifesto, a carefully crafted franchise, saw the Tsarist government try to reassert its authority and control by splitting up its opposition; appealing to the less extreme revolutionaries such as the liberals, who accepted the manifesto, it promised reforms and the creation of an elected national Parliament. Though the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks remained unsatisfied, this was surely the turning point whereon the Tsar began to regain control - the Revolution had failed to topple his government because of its ability to react to increasingly problematic factors. Like the attempted Revolution in 1905, the February Revolution was almost completely leaderless and spontaneous. By 1917 patriotism within Russia was dangerously low; the heavy defeats during the First World War at Tannenburg and the Masurian Lakes led to lack of confidence and popularity with the Tsar's government. Furthermore the continued effort in the war made for a rise in support of the Marxist theory that said Tsarism was outdated and would not support the decisions of its people. ...read more.

Conclusion

The constant defeat against Germany leading up to the February Revolution left Russia in a state of desperation, with little reason to be patriotic, and led to a widespread requisite for change. This requisite was also shown by the Tsar's own Duma and Cossacks; they had previously stayed loyal and obeyed the word of the Tsar but began to disobey him upon his order to fire at the protestors in Petrograd and, eventually, they turned on him altogether, ultimately intercepting his train and suggesting that he abdicate. In conclusion, I believe the reason for the downfall of Tsarism in the revolution of 1917 but not that of 1905, was due to the uncalculated detriment of the Tsar's absence for fighting in the First World War. The war itself created a worse enough situation in Russia, but the absence of the Tsar meant that he could not readily react to any problematic uprising like he could during the revolution of 1905, this left his government wide open to rebellion and led to the eventual end of his reign. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam Beardmore ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. was bloody sunday the prime reason for the 1905 revolution

    The Potemkin mutiny may have not played a major role in the 1905 revolution but however it publicised the overall poor living conditions in Russia at the time as the sailors were forced to eat scraps of meat infested with maggots.

  2. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    speech, assembly and worship and the legalising of trade unions and along with the Duma which would share in the running of the country the Liberals appetite for reforms was satisfied, and they were keen to work with the Tsar in the Duma to bring about gradual change therefore these

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    The soldiers were available to keep law and order and were moved away from the Eastern border. Also, losing the war to an Asian nation was a national humiliation and the Russians were united by this defeat. The main reason why the revolution of 1905 wasn't successful is because there were so many doubts, in the minds of the disunited.

  2. Why was the Tsar able to survive Revolution in 1905 with his powers intact?

    This lack of unity could not prove to be a good fight against the Tsar, with the lack of strong opposition allowing him to hold onto his rule and survive the 'Revolution'. The actions of the Liberals, however, also support the opinion that the events in 1905 were not a revolution because there was no drive to overthrow the Tsar.

  1. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    Paul Miliukov became Foreign Minister and Alexander Kerensky the Minister of Justice, representing left- wing liberals. The general aim of this government is clear enough: to make a political revolution, not a social revolution. Yet social reform if not social revolution was necessary in the existing conditions of agrarian unrest and dissatisfaction of the industrial proletariat.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    They argued that the working class of Russia had no interest or place in the war, and that even victory would offer the common people nothing. Industrialisation and Class Russia's industrial revolution came at the end of the 1800s, and therefore the beginning of the 20th Century marked a huge break in tradition for common people.

  1. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    The Tsar, not wanting to give up any power rejected the progressive bloc which alienated all of his supporters. A monarchist said ?the whole point of the Progressive Bloc was to prevent revolution? showing that people just wanted to help out and keep things running, however Nicolas? inability to give

  2. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    The Tsar?s inability to recognise the need for reform of some sort, illustrated by his dissolution of the progressive State Duma, further enhanced Liberal opposition to the Tsar. The Tsar had made it apparent that he was not interested in reform.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work