• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did war break out in Europe 1939

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did war break out in Europe 1939? When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1939, he was not at all secretive about his plans for Germany. He had four main aims, which were: - Abolish the Treaty of Versailles - Expand German territory - Defeat communism - The creation of One Reich He, like many others, believed the Treaty of Versailles was unjust and planned to abolish it. He called the German leaders who signed the Treaty the "November Criminals". The treat was a constant reminder of Germany's defeat in the First World War and their mortification by the Allies. The first step of getting revenge on the Treaty would be rearmament. When Hitler came into power thousands of unemployed workers were drafted into the army. He kept the rearmament secret at first, yet he soon withdrew from the League and openly staged a massive rally celebrating Germany's armed forces in 1935. He managed to get away with the rearmament, which also boosted the Nazi support. Hitler planned on reintroducing conscription (which he did in 1936) and remilitarising the Rhineland. Hitler wanted to get back Germany's territory as well as unite with Austria (Anschluss). ...read more.

Middle

To Hitler however this was merely a piece of paper. France and Britain however, had their own clarified reasons why they came up with the Appeasement. Firstly, they were not ready for another war and standing up to Germany meant just that. It gave them more time to get ready. They also did not want a repeat of the Great War. They wished to avoid another war at all costs. An argument Britain used was that Hitler was standing up to Communism. Many people thought that the next war would be against the USSR not Germany and Hitler. Many viewed Hitler as a buffer against the threat of spreading Communism. Many also agreed with the fact that the Treaty of Versailles was in fact unfair. They assumed that once Germany got what they wanted they would become a peaceful nation again. Britain's other worries were its economical problems and empire. It was not certain that Britain's Empire and the Commonwealth states would support a war against Germany. Britain and France were still suffering from the Depression and had greats debts as well as unemployment. The USA was determined not to be dragged into another war and so there was no guarantee that Britain could face Germany without USA's help. ...read more.

Conclusion

If Britain and France co operated a bit more in the direction of solving world disputes the Word might have never came into being. Another major problem was America. From the very start of the League, America was the missing keystone of the organisation. Everything was going reasonable well until the Depression occurred and America isolated itself. If the USA decided to join in the League's business things might have turned out very differently as America had the resources and power to make a difference. France and Britain had too much trust in Hitler. They let him go too far and trusted a bit of signed paper (Appeasement). If they had acted sooner e.g. when Hitler went into the Rhineland, they could have prevented the war. The USSR was also partly responsible for the war. Germany might have been scared to act alone without the support of the USSR. It would have meant they would be fighting on two fronts again. If the USSR had not supported Germany then but stayed with the allies, it might have delayed or even stopped Hitler's attack. These are all factors that speeded up and made the Second World War possible. However, we cannot forget that Hitler's actions were the main reason the war had occurred and these factors mentioned merely added onto this not the other way round. ?? ?? ?? ?? Justyna Lucznik 10NR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    It was a pleasant theory, but not one that could ever work, especially after the distinct immorality of the Great War. Wilson was quoted as saying that 'friendship is the only cement that will ever hold the world together'. In order for there to be friendship, there must first be trust.

  2. history unit 4 Germany's attack on Poland in September 1939 was the main reason ...

    was not interested in appeasing him and they stood firm in their promise to Poland. This is what really triggered the war but a month earlier Britain could have seen it coming their way all the same. During August of that year Stalin had been engaging the Nazi government in

  1. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    issues inherent in negotiating with an openly aggressive dictator such as Hitler, and to appreciate that war is often preferable to peace bought at a very high moral cost. Some historians, for example John Charmley, believe that rather than being negligent, Chamberlain was justified in appeasing Hitler in the Munich Conference.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Abyssinia would be split up with Italy getting the fertile lands and a large area to the south would be reserved for Italian economic advancement. Neither Italy nor Abyssinia was involved in these "talks". These "talks" were then leaked to the press.

  1. Bismarck's effect on Germany and Europe

    elected by universal male suffrage and gave a sense of equality between the states. Engaging Germany in such democratic acts maddened the conservatives and the liberalist. But in truth it was only the appearance of a democracy because the branches of the government possessed the ultimate power of the state.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    to intervene in any conflicts and it seemed increasingly likely that Russia would be left fighting Germany on her own. Also, in the short run, Russian troops were fighting Japanese troops in 1938 and 1939 on the borders of Manchuria and Mongolia.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Evidently the Soviets were still thinking in terms of better relations with the Nazis, deliveries to whom were maintained with scrupulous fidelity throughout the period of the pact, as well as with Hitler's Japanese allies. In the spring Foreign Minister Matsuoka came to Europe, and in April a Soviet-Japanese neutrality

  2. Vietnam war

    to North Vietnam, while perhaps 1,000,000 Vietnamese moved from north to south. One of the leading Communists in the South, L� Du�n, returned to Hanoi to urge that the Vietnam Workers' Party (VWP) take a firmer stand on national reunification.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work