• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did war break out in Europe 1939

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did war break out in Europe 1939? When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1939, he was not at all secretive about his plans for Germany. He had four main aims, which were: - Abolish the Treaty of Versailles - Expand German territory - Defeat communism - The creation of One Reich He, like many others, believed the Treaty of Versailles was unjust and planned to abolish it. He called the German leaders who signed the Treaty the "November Criminals". The treat was a constant reminder of Germany's defeat in the First World War and their mortification by the Allies. The first step of getting revenge on the Treaty would be rearmament. When Hitler came into power thousands of unemployed workers were drafted into the army. He kept the rearmament secret at first, yet he soon withdrew from the League and openly staged a massive rally celebrating Germany's armed forces in 1935. He managed to get away with the rearmament, which also boosted the Nazi support. Hitler planned on reintroducing conscription (which he did in 1936) and remilitarising the Rhineland. Hitler wanted to get back Germany's territory as well as unite with Austria (Anschluss). ...read more.

Middle

To Hitler however this was merely a piece of paper. France and Britain however, had their own clarified reasons why they came up with the Appeasement. Firstly, they were not ready for another war and standing up to Germany meant just that. It gave them more time to get ready. They also did not want a repeat of the Great War. They wished to avoid another war at all costs. An argument Britain used was that Hitler was standing up to Communism. Many people thought that the next war would be against the USSR not Germany and Hitler. Many viewed Hitler as a buffer against the threat of spreading Communism. Many also agreed with the fact that the Treaty of Versailles was in fact unfair. They assumed that once Germany got what they wanted they would become a peaceful nation again. Britain's other worries were its economical problems and empire. It was not certain that Britain's Empire and the Commonwealth states would support a war against Germany. Britain and France were still suffering from the Depression and had greats debts as well as unemployment. The USA was determined not to be dragged into another war and so there was no guarantee that Britain could face Germany without USA's help. ...read more.

Conclusion

If Britain and France co operated a bit more in the direction of solving world disputes the Word might have never came into being. Another major problem was America. From the very start of the League, America was the missing keystone of the organisation. Everything was going reasonable well until the Depression occurred and America isolated itself. If the USA decided to join in the League's business things might have turned out very differently as America had the resources and power to make a difference. France and Britain had too much trust in Hitler. They let him go too far and trusted a bit of signed paper (Appeasement). If they had acted sooner e.g. when Hitler went into the Rhineland, they could have prevented the war. The USSR was also partly responsible for the war. Germany might have been scared to act alone without the support of the USSR. It would have meant they would be fighting on two fronts again. If the USSR had not supported Germany then but stayed with the allies, it might have delayed or even stopped Hitler's attack. These are all factors that speeded up and made the Second World War possible. However, we cannot forget that Hitler's actions were the main reason the war had occurred and these factors mentioned merely added onto this not the other way round. ?? ?? ?? ?? Justyna Lucznik 10NR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    It is quite permissible to argue that the League failed as soon as the idea of a single army was dissolved. In conclusion, it is of the utmost importance that the significance of these causes is realised. It is also necessary to understand how they interlinked to result in the failure of the League.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    to intervene in any conflicts and it seemed increasingly likely that Russia would be left fighting Germany on her own. Also, in the short run, Russian troops were fighting Japanese troops in 1938 and 1939 on the borders of Manchuria and Mongolia.

  1. Vietnam war

    With the overthrow of Sihanouk in March 1970, the US supported Lon Nol, immediately sending $500 million in military aid. However this would prove an ill-fated decision as Lon Nol's government fell to the Khmer Rouge, resulting in one of the worst atrocities of recent history.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    One of the most fateful aspects of the whole story of this post-war period derives from the fact that the German people failed to do anything themselves to throw off the yoke of the Nazi dictatorship. Even under the hammering blows of Allied bombings and of Allied armies pushing deeper

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    These "talks" were then leaked to the press. So everyone knew that the British and French and the league were ready to just give in and give the aggressors what they wanted. With this the Italians then fully invaded Abyssinia and the league do nothing to stop it as the two main powers didn't want too provoke the Italians.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    across either of them before the age of thirty a suggestion that he would play a major role in 20th century history would have seemed incredible."10 Hitler and Stalin came to power as a direct result from the period they were in.

  1. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    was dominant within British society and Chamberlains policy was to appease Hitler's actions stating that "Germany has the right to station their troops anywhere within its own country." Continuing with this view lord Lothian sated they are "only going into there own back garden."

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    this policy and that he was only pressurised by others such as Halifax and Churchill to guarantee Poland?s borders and subsequently declare war on Germany in 1939. Chamberlain according Charmley should have followed appeasement through to its logical conclusion. This would have ultimately given Germany a free hand in Eastern Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work