• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did war break out in Europe 1939

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did war break out in Europe 1939? When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1939, he was not at all secretive about his plans for Germany. He had four main aims, which were: - Abolish the Treaty of Versailles - Expand German territory - Defeat communism - The creation of One Reich He, like many others, believed the Treaty of Versailles was unjust and planned to abolish it. He called the German leaders who signed the Treaty the "November Criminals". The treat was a constant reminder of Germany's defeat in the First World War and their mortification by the Allies. The first step of getting revenge on the Treaty would be rearmament. When Hitler came into power thousands of unemployed workers were drafted into the army. He kept the rearmament secret at first, yet he soon withdrew from the League and openly staged a massive rally celebrating Germany's armed forces in 1935. He managed to get away with the rearmament, which also boosted the Nazi support. Hitler planned on reintroducing conscription (which he did in 1936) and remilitarising the Rhineland. Hitler wanted to get back Germany's territory as well as unite with Austria (Anschluss). ...read more.

Middle

To Hitler however this was merely a piece of paper. France and Britain however, had their own clarified reasons why they came up with the Appeasement. Firstly, they were not ready for another war and standing up to Germany meant just that. It gave them more time to get ready. They also did not want a repeat of the Great War. They wished to avoid another war at all costs. An argument Britain used was that Hitler was standing up to Communism. Many people thought that the next war would be against the USSR not Germany and Hitler. Many viewed Hitler as a buffer against the threat of spreading Communism. Many also agreed with the fact that the Treaty of Versailles was in fact unfair. They assumed that once Germany got what they wanted they would become a peaceful nation again. Britain's other worries were its economical problems and empire. It was not certain that Britain's Empire and the Commonwealth states would support a war against Germany. Britain and France were still suffering from the Depression and had greats debts as well as unemployment. The USA was determined not to be dragged into another war and so there was no guarantee that Britain could face Germany without USA's help. ...read more.

Conclusion

If Britain and France co operated a bit more in the direction of solving world disputes the Word might have never came into being. Another major problem was America. From the very start of the League, America was the missing keystone of the organisation. Everything was going reasonable well until the Depression occurred and America isolated itself. If the USA decided to join in the League's business things might have turned out very differently as America had the resources and power to make a difference. France and Britain had too much trust in Hitler. They let him go too far and trusted a bit of signed paper (Appeasement). If they had acted sooner e.g. when Hitler went into the Rhineland, they could have prevented the war. The USSR was also partly responsible for the war. Germany might have been scared to act alone without the support of the USSR. It would have meant they would be fighting on two fronts again. If the USSR had not supported Germany then but stayed with the allies, it might have delayed or even stopped Hitler's attack. These are all factors that speeded up and made the Second World War possible. However, we cannot forget that Hitler's actions were the main reason the war had occurred and these factors mentioned merely added onto this not the other way round. ?? ?? ?? ?? Justyna Lucznik 10NR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    ii. The absence of disarmament (this was caused primarily by the long-term mistrust between member states and other countries). iii. The non-formation of a League of Nations Army. Moral force failed because it was a social ideal, not a political reality.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    Therefore, Stalin had to settle the European uncertainty quickly so that he could send more troops to the Far East. Considering that Litvinov was not able to make collective security work, Stalin needed an alternative fast. On May 3 1939, Stalin replaced Litvinov with Molotov as foreign commissar.

  1. Vietnam war

    in any more favourable military position.'. Hence, in an attempt to reach an alternative solution, LBJ organized secret negotiations on May 13 1968 to end the war and halted B-52 bombing of North Vietnam in November 1, 1968. Of further importance was his decision to not accept the nomination to run for reelection, concluding in his speech: "let men everywhere know...

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Hitler could not be replace because it difficult to imagine anyone who could replace him.18 One of the most significant factors which historians have focussed upon is the cult personalities they both developed and the use of propaganda to achieve this.

  1. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    issues inherent in negotiating with an openly aggressive dictator such as Hitler, and to appreciate that war is often preferable to peace bought at a very high moral cost. Some historians, for example John Charmley, believe that rather than being negligent, Chamberlain was justified in appeasing Hitler in the Munich Conference.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    They even let Italy use the Suez Canal to supply their army; they could have closed it which would probably have stopped the Italian invasion outright. Secretly Britain and France agreed a plan that they thought would bring the invasion to an end.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The worst casualties had been incurred in Eastern Europe. Poland lost nearly 5.5 million of its people-more than one-sixth of the prewar population. The Soviet Union lost a horrendous 20 million people-more than a tenth of its population, including over 13 million civilians. Germany, too, paid a fearful price for Hitler's war.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    If this led to a war between Germany and Russia ?all the better for humanity? as Baldwin earlier stated. Instead the blunders that accompanied the policy of appeasement confused the German leadership and ultimately led to what has become known as the ?wrong war?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work