• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did War break out in Europe in 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did War break out in Europe in 1939? When Hitler came to power he had 3 main aims, to abolish the Treaty of Versailles, to expand German territory and to defeat communism. Like many Germans Hitler believed the Treaty of Versailles was unjust. He hated the Treaty and called the German leaders who had signed it 'The November Criminals'. The Treaty was a constant reminder to Germans of their defeat in the First World War and their humiliation by the Allies. Hitler promised that if he became leader of Germany he would reverse it. By the time he came to power some of the terms had already been changed, for example, Germany had stopped making reparations payments altogether. However most points were still in place and 5 especially still angered him: * Germany's armed forces to be severely limited * The Rhineland to be a de-militarised zone * Germany forbidden to unite with Austria * The polish corridor given to Poland * The Sudetenland taken into the new state of Czechoslovakia The Treaty had take away German territory. Hitler wanted to get that territory back, he wanted Germany to unite with Austria, he wanted German minorities in other countries, such as Czechoslovakia, to rejoin Germany, but he also wanted to carve out an empire in eastern Europe and Russia to give extra living space (Lebensraum) for Germans. A German empire carved out of Russia would also help Hitler with another one of his objectives, the defeat of Communism or Bolshevism. ...read more.

Middle

These are the two blows that gave Hitler the confidence the need. He thought that if they didn't stop Mussolini from invading a country then why would they stop Hitler from invading land that used to be Germany's in the first place. It also showed him how none of the major powers wanted to risk their army and navy at war over such disputes. The thing that gave Hitler even more confidence was the fact that Britain sympathised with Hitler, first of all he was anti-communist and Britain was also very against communism at this time, and secondly, most of Britain, and especially the Politicians, sympathised with Germany as they felt the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany as well. With this in mind he knew he only had France to overcome then, and he also knew, that without Britain, France would do nothing, as proved in Manchuria and Abyssinia. Appeasement was first introduced in 1936 for a number of reasons. Firstly, Hitler was not the only concern for Britain, infact he wasn't even there main one. If anything, they were more concerned about the particular dangers to world peace opposed by Stalin, the new leader of the USSR. There were certainly many in Britain and France who, despite their agreement with Russia in 1953, wholly approved of Hitler anti-communist policies and saw Hitler as the buffer to the threat of spreading communism. Secondly, many felt that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair to Germany. They assumed that once these wrongs were put right then Germany would become a peaceful nation again. ...read more.

Conclusion

They announced to a stunned world that they had agreed not to attack each other. Privately and unknown to the rest of the world they had agreed to divide Poland between themselves. Hitler was now confident of success. On 1st September 1939, the German armed forces attacked Poland from the west and on 17th September Soviet forces attacked from the east. Poland soon fell, but to Hitler's surprise, Britain and France held their promises and declared war on Germany, Hitler had taken one gamble too many. Although it was Hitler's actions that led to war, there were many other factors important in the breakout of war. The league's powerlessness was a big factor, as if they had stopped Hitler in the early stages or even showed that they were not afraid to, perhaps by punishing Mussolini, then Hitler would have feared more and wouldn't have aimed so high. Neville Chamberlain's idea Appeasement was also a big factor in war, this once again gave Hitler the confidence he needed to do almost anything he wanted, as Britain would let him, then leaving no one who could stop him, as France were not a big enough force against Hitler alone. The final and maybe the most important of the three was Britain's attitude towards Hitler and war at the time. The were very against communism, and Hitler knew this, so he thought, and thought correctly that they would be on his side, all he would have to do was just say he wanted to destroy communism, despite him obviously wanting power, so Britain's ignorance in the situation was a major factor. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    If the League had formed a single army (which could never have happened if disarmament was to be upheld) then it may have made a better job of keeping international peace. Added to that, if peace had been maintained, then disarmament would have happened eventually as the need for mass armouries would have diminished.

  2. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939?

    Stalin had been worried about the German threaten to the USSR ever since Hitler came to power. Hitler had interest in conquering Russian Land. Hitler denounced communists and he announced openly that he would kill all communists in Germany. As Stalin could not make an agreement with Britain and France

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Hitler sought to eliminate a race through the Holocaust and there is no evidence to suggest any mercy for his actions. In contrast, there have been cases reported where communist authorities released people from the gulags. Stalin believed that the death orders he was putting forth were valid because he was punishing them for their crimes.

  2. Was the appeasement of Nazi Germany by Britain and France ever anything more than ...

    the Munich agreement.6 This is strong evidence to show that, in public opinion at least, appeasement was a viable policy to pursue. However, despite this public opinion, politicians in both Britain and France were acutely aware of how powerful Nazi Germany had become, and after Chamberlain's declaration of 'peace in

  1. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    For oil, the plan involved the construction of synthetic plants. It was hoped that by 1940 the total supplies would be 5.0 million tons annually, sufficient for wartime level of consumption19. For steel, in order to speed up the steel production, the Hermann Goering Ore and Foundry Company (Reichswerke Aktiengeseelschaft fur Erzbergbau and Eisenhutten "Herman Goering")

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Half of Britain's mercantile fleet had been sent to the bottom. The financial system had been destroyed and international trade completely disrupted. Some currencies collapsed completely and inflation got out of hand in many countries: in Hungary one American dollar was worth 11 sextillion pengoes.

  1. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    They will cry out ?We want war!??[9]. This goes some way in explaining Germany?s capacity to back Hitler as they saw it him and the Nazis as the only way they could they could reclaim their losses. It also may explain Germany?s course of action before the outbreak of war in 1939.

  2. Even after the German occupation of Prague in March 1939, Neville Chamberlain was reluctant ...

    Following the invasion Chamberlain told the cabinet that ?No reliance could be placed on any of the assurances given by the Nazi Leaders? thus showing that Chamberlain had stopped trusting that Hitler could be pleased by negotiation. Chamberlain?s actions further support this, following the Czechoslovakian Crisis, British rearmaments and preparations

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work