• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did World War II happen?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did World War II happen? There is still much on-going debate about who was responsible for the Second World War. Many feel that the infamous Treaty of Versailles is responsible, by filling the German people with hatred and the desire for vengeance. Some feel that The League of Nations and its lack of assertiveness are responsible for failing to ensure disarmament and control aggressors and some even feel that economic turmoil was the reason, as Hitler's rise to power was essentially a response of the harsh times after the crushing 1929 Wall Street Crash and lengthy Great Depression. It is important to note however, that by 1938, although some German reparations had been cancelled and Germany had been offered compensation for lost colonies, Germany took a number of measures that are seen to many as large contributing factors towards War. Disarmament clauses had been overlooked, meaning that the Rhineland had been repossessed and remilitarised, Austria and Germany had become united and 3.5 million Germans had been regained from Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Middle

and from the Hossbach memorandum, a summary made by Colonel Hossbach (a man close to Hitler) at a Nazi meeting in November 1937. Hitler explained his aggressive foreign policy plans to party-members at this meeting. If true, this would essentially discount appeasement as a trigger to war. On the other hand, is it possible the USSR were responsible for triggering war by signing the non-aggression pact and remaining neutral with Germany initially? Many feel the signing of the pact was tactical and gave the Russians time to build defences and military might. If Russia had of joined with the allies and Poland, Hitler would surely be forced to keep the peace. It must be noted though, Britain were particularly reluctant to ally with the Russians. Chamberlain not only feared the spread of communism into Europe and a revolution, but saw the Russian military as weak and extremely ineffective. The axis powers were extremely fearful of both communism and Fascism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlain has been publically criticised for backing the wrong issue when he made a stand against Hitler when he entered Poland in September 1939. Poland had a relatively weak military force and was geographically difficult to defend. If Chamberlain had of made his stand when Hitler seized Munich, he could have backed the Czechs who had a powerful industry and a much stronger military force than Poland. Many question Chamberlain's motives, as intervention at Munich would appear a much more logical choice to curb Hitler's expansion. Supporters of Chamberlain claim his actions provided Britain with more time to prepare for war. Although opinions are divided over who started World War II, it widely believed that Hitler's vicious foreign policy and eventual invasion of Poland in 1939 was the trigger point. In the words of German historian J Hest; "Hitler's entire career was orientated towards war". Before 1st September 1939, nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, Hitler's aggressive expansion, allied fear of communism and fascism, resentments stemming from World War I and the Great Depression played large parts in setting the stage for war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Vietnam war

    nationwide enquiry into the correctness of the Johnson administration's optimism who said, 'the end is coming into view. The enemy's hopes are bankrupt.' * This reflected through Johnson's approval rating, which plummeted from 40% to 26% in the six weeks after the Tet offensive.

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    This opportunity came in 1869 when the Spanish Succession crisis made war inevitable and he saw the opportunity a war with France would have, hence he manipulated the Ems telegram to cause war. If Bismarck did not have aims of uniting Germany then the Franco-Prussian war may not have happened

  1. Hitlers Germany

    In January 1940 the plans for operation "Yellow" fell by accident into Belgian hands and had to be recast completely. Meanwhile, Hitler's attention was drawn to an operation suggested by the naval command, namely, to seize Denmark and Norway as bases for submarine operations against the British navy.

  2. How did the Holocaust happen, and who is responsible?

    Although, Germany was not the only country which showed anti-Semitic policies, most countries at the time did so, after World War I many Jewish people saw Germany as the centre of modern civilisation. National Socialism was a political ideology which was a one of a kind in the way in which it displayed racism and anti-Semitism.

  1. Discuss Hitler’s eventual gaining of Lebensraum. Was it merely opportunistic or astutely ...

    but wished the expansion or union of Smaller central European states such as Austria and Czechoslovakia. One of Mr Taylor's strong factors in denouncing a blue print or 'programme' for German expansion, is a discussion between Hitler and his senior advisors and commanders in on the 5th of November 1937.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    The method of giving ground to the dictators in the hope that they would be satisfied and pacified was clearly limited. The backing down of the Italians over the "private submarine" incident showed what a firm stance could achieve. However the lesson was not learned, Britain was again about to try and appease Hitler.

  1. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    Blum therefore suggested a policy of non-intervention by all European powers be promoted. Consequently the British government were enthusiastic of this policy but always presented it as a French initiative. Therefore the non-intervention committee included Britain, France Russia, Germany and Italy.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    this policy and that he was only pressurised by others such as Halifax and Churchill to guarantee Poland?s borders and subsequently declare war on Germany in 1939. Chamberlain according Charmley should have followed appeasement through to its logical conclusion. This would have ultimately given Germany a free hand in Eastern Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work