• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did World War II happen?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did World War II happen? There is still much on-going debate about who was responsible for the Second World War. Many feel that the infamous Treaty of Versailles is responsible, by filling the German people with hatred and the desire for vengeance. Some feel that The League of Nations and its lack of assertiveness are responsible for failing to ensure disarmament and control aggressors and some even feel that economic turmoil was the reason, as Hitler's rise to power was essentially a response of the harsh times after the crushing 1929 Wall Street Crash and lengthy Great Depression. It is important to note however, that by 1938, although some German reparations had been cancelled and Germany had been offered compensation for lost colonies, Germany took a number of measures that are seen to many as large contributing factors towards War. Disarmament clauses had been overlooked, meaning that the Rhineland had been repossessed and remilitarised, Austria and Germany had become united and 3.5 million Germans had been regained from Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Middle

and from the Hossbach memorandum, a summary made by Colonel Hossbach (a man close to Hitler) at a Nazi meeting in November 1937. Hitler explained his aggressive foreign policy plans to party-members at this meeting. If true, this would essentially discount appeasement as a trigger to war. On the other hand, is it possible the USSR were responsible for triggering war by signing the non-aggression pact and remaining neutral with Germany initially? Many feel the signing of the pact was tactical and gave the Russians time to build defences and military might. If Russia had of joined with the allies and Poland, Hitler would surely be forced to keep the peace. It must be noted though, Britain were particularly reluctant to ally with the Russians. Chamberlain not only feared the spread of communism into Europe and a revolution, but saw the Russian military as weak and extremely ineffective. The axis powers were extremely fearful of both communism and Fascism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlain has been publically criticised for backing the wrong issue when he made a stand against Hitler when he entered Poland in September 1939. Poland had a relatively weak military force and was geographically difficult to defend. If Chamberlain had of made his stand when Hitler seized Munich, he could have backed the Czechs who had a powerful industry and a much stronger military force than Poland. Many question Chamberlain's motives, as intervention at Munich would appear a much more logical choice to curb Hitler's expansion. Supporters of Chamberlain claim his actions provided Britain with more time to prepare for war. Although opinions are divided over who started World War II, it widely believed that Hitler's vicious foreign policy and eventual invasion of Poland in 1939 was the trigger point. In the words of German historian J Hest; "Hitler's entire career was orientated towards war". Before 1st September 1939, nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, Hitler's aggressive expansion, allied fear of communism and fascism, resentments stemming from World War I and the Great Depression played large parts in setting the stage for war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    asks William I to agree never to renew the candidature of a Prussian on the Spanish throne, William rejects this and believes it threatens his honour. This in my opinion begins to light the fuse of the Franco-Prussian war because before this event French and Prussian relations were becoming more

  2. Hitlers Germany

    But his generals, fearful of the coming conflict in the West, stalled and again plotted his removal. After an ugly, angry scene with the commander in chief of the army, Hitler postponed the operation. The Allies, feeling smugly safe believed the Maginot line, also did not stir.

  1. Vietnam war

    Crops, agricultural land destroyed, agent orange and other poisons kill not only trees but people, villages burnt to the ground, Da Nang dumps- floods, refugees, hyper- urbanisation into Saigon. Many joined the VC, and favoured the North. Influx of American troops and money, lead to bars and brothels.

  2. britaina nd disarmament

    than actual physical disarmament, and this was understood by all British governments in the 1920s. In November 1921, the Washington Naval Conference was convened to discuss a form of naval disarmament. It was proposed that limitations be put upon the building of so-called capital ships which exceeded 10,000 tons according to a ratio.

  1. How did the Holocaust happen, and who is responsible?

    Although, Germany was not the only country which showed anti-Semitic policies, most countries at the time did so, after World War I many Jewish people saw Germany as the centre of modern civilisation. National Socialism was a political ideology which was a one of a kind in the way in which it displayed racism and anti-Semitism.

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    The Great Depression caused mass unemployment, wide spread poverty and despair. It weakened democratic governments and strengthened extreme political movements that promised to end the economic problems. Two movements in particular gained strength. The forces of Communism, known as the Left, called for revolution by the workers.

  1. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    have fundamentally required military action, which neither Britain and France were ready for due to the strong consensus amongst their societies for the avoidance of any military conflict, which had resulted in slow military rearmament. ] The next stage in which Britains policy of appeasement was increasingly tested was the Spanish civil war.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    It was a threat because so long as the Rhineland was demilitarised, the Germans in order to invade France through Belgium, would have to use large forces to hold the Rhineland and their striking forces would be reduced. After occupying the Rhineland, they could fortify it, hold the frontier with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work