• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Had Napoleon Reached Such a Dominant position by 1801?

Extracts from this document...


WHY HAD NAPOLEON REACHED SUCH A DOMINANT POSITION BY 1801? There can be no doubt that Napoleon turned out to be one of the greatest military leaders of all time, but why? It is obvious he had great military talent and skill, but how large a role did luck play in his rise to power? If Napoleon had wanted to someday become leader of France even before his birth in 1769, he could not have wished for better luck, for just 1 year before his birth his homeland, Corsica, was bought by the French from the Italians. This event, of course, made Napoleon French. This, combined with his parent's bank balance, helped him into a French military school where he learnt the skills and talents which were amongst his greatest assets in coming to power, and without which he never could have made his remarkable achievements. But despite all of his expensive schooling and no matter how good his leadership may have been, there is no doubt that above all else Napoleon's greatest asset was the revolution and the consequences thereof. ...read more.


This success brought him popularity and fame within the country without which he wouldn't have stood a chance in running the country. But it wasn't only his personal attributes and his luck that was in Napoleon's favour, because back in France, the Directory who had been running the country since The Terror were doing a poor job, providing Napoleon with just the opportunity he needed to come in and seize power. Which he eventually did in 1799, with a certain amount of help from within the Directory. But it was what he did as soon as he came into power that really gave him a strong base and showed his dominance, for he immediately introduced a new set of laws (the Code Napoleon) as well as setting up a national bank which really stamped his authority on what was going on. The National Bank also helped to keep the economy stable and so prevented Napoleon from being exposed financially. Having sorted out his affairs within France, and the crucial thing if he was to stay in power, the next thing on his agenda was to defeat the second coalition. ...read more.


In Napoleon's case it was his personality that lead to these things, Napoleon we know was arrogant and decisive, which is a good quality for both a military and national leader as this means that he liked to take a look at a situation and make a decision instead of maybe waiting and then making up his mind. Having a strong leader such as this is also good for the morale of troops as they will know exactly what to do and when with no one second guessing the leader. A strong leader is also exactly what France needed at the time to sort out the economy and foreign affairs following the weak rule of the directory. Napoleon's luck certainly had a fair amount to do with his success, but that is not unexpected for 'fortune favours the brave', and Napoleon was certainly never one to duck out of a fight. Undoubtedly Napoleon would never have achieved so much in such a short period of time if he were short in military prowess or courage. Napoleon was a man with drive who had both skill and luck as a military commander and by this point had embarked on his main aim to revolutionise French society (education, law, infrastructure). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful was Napoleon III?

    In the Crimean war he lost control and ended up being forced into a war, in Italy Napoleon lost control which meant that the king of Piedmont was able to seize power (infuriating the Catholics). In 1864 Napoleon decided to remain in Mexico after Juarez, who had delayed debt re-payments

  2. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    could not be allowed to perish.10 Meanwhile Prussia was rapidly nearing the main action and Napoleon saw that he had one last chance at victory before Prussia could intervene. He called upon his Old Guards to follow him to a decisive attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work