• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Charles V involved in such prolonged conflicts with the Kings of France?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Charles V involved in such prolonged conflicts with the Kings of France? The conflict between the Habsburg Emperor Charles V and the Valois King of France Francis I commenced in 1521 and came to an end in 1559 in the reigns of their successors, Philip II and Henry II. The wars were extremely damaging to the kingdom of France, to the empire of Charles V and indeed to Christendom as a whole. The conflict was so prolonged due to a number of reasons. The personal rivalry between Francis I and Charles V caused hostility between the two men and ensured that both were unwilling to let the other get the upper hand. When Charles V and Francis I became kings of their respective lands both were very young and ambitious young men, who wanted to make a name for themselves. In 1519 Charles was elected Holy Roman Emperor in succession to his grandfather Maximillian, to the dismay of Francis who also wanted the title. The electors were persuaded to choose Charles through a number of expensive bribes. They also believed that Charles was less likely to interfere with the independence of the princes because he had such extensive lands to govern. This event ensured Charles took precedence over his rival and made Francis determined to resist Charles V's claims to supremacy within Europe by waging costly wars. ...read more.

Middle

In 1526, Henry saw the danger of a Habsburg dominance within Europe, if it were able to defeat France and therefore supported the League of Cognac, an anti Habsburg alliance. His unreliability and self-interest as an ally was also shown when he allied with Francis in 1528 due to his desire to divorce, something that an allegiance with the Catholic Charles could not give. Each side also provoked bitterness by making alliances with the enemies of the other side to further their political goals. In 1526 Francis made an alliance with the 'infidellic' Ottoman Turks who Charles perceived as being a serious threat to Christendom. Francis also began to support the Lutheran movement because he saw the trouble Charles was having with it and therefore he wanted to continue the growth of Protestantism in Germany. In 1528, Andrea Doria, the Genoese admiral, was persuaded by Charles's agents to abandon the French, with whom he was helping to blockade Naples, and join the Habsburgs. This was very important because it allowed Charles to lift the blockade of Naples, it meant that the large Genoese fleet was left at his disposal and access to loans from Genoese bankers. Alliances made with outside influences by both sides fuelled the resentment that they felt for one another. Dynastic rivalry prolonged the war between both sides and made it hard for settlements to be agreed upon. ...read more.

Conclusion

The changing nature of warfare also prolonged the conflict to some degree. The development of heavy artillery and the invention of gunpowder put an end to easy victories on the battlefield and the use of the aquebus with pike men prolonged battles because it gave advantage to the defending side, making it harder to make a break through, thus encouraging stalemate. Such stalemate was added to by the fact that both sides built fortresses which led to long sieges, such as the expensive siege of Metz in 1553. I therefore conclude that the prolonged conflict between the Habsburg and Valois dynasties can be explained by a combination of factors. Territorial disputes ensured persistent controversy, Dynastic rivalry ensured that neither side was willing to compromise on ancestral areas such as Burgundy and alliances made with outside influences increased suspicion between the two sides to a large degree. In my opinion, however, the most important reason for the prolonged conflict was due to the personal rivalry between Charles V and Francis I. Neither man wanted the other to get the upper hand which meant that compromises were unable to be made between the two and thus ensured that the search for peace was a drawn out affair. It was only when either man was willing to swallow their pride, as was the case with Charles at the Peace of Cambrai, that progress could be made. John Round Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    undertaken the task of reforming Russia and bringing it in to a new free and modern, industrialised economic position. Westwood argues, ?no Russian ruler brought so much relief to so many of his people as did Alexander II?[9], which supports the argument that even though in hindsight the reforms had

  2. Why did Charles V fail to crush Luther?

    so that there was an increasing demand for fertile land that could not be met. Luther's message greatly appealed to them, 'His call for spiritual equality given the 'priesthood of all believers' was readily extended by the peasants of a demand for social equality.'(Lotherington pg 146)

  1. Henry V Character Analysis

    I think that this feature was seen as an even greater quality in King Henry V's society when the King was seen as almost synonymous to God or God's representation on Earth and he is anointed by Him. In one of his most famous speeches, Henry again encourages his soldiers

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Since she was so beloved by the public, many historians feel that Charles feared her intentions. At the peak of her success she was potentially able to do anything without the fear of facing any consequences. Although speculative, several historians believe Charles suffered from psychological neuroses including paranoia.7 Such paranoia

  1. Henry V Assignment

    Orl�ans, Act 3, Scene 7, Lines 127-128 We can take this into consideration but it didn't affect my judgement as they are the enemy and so are bound to say things like that.

  2. Henry IV of France

    Towns and provinces hastened to show allegiance to the King and gave up their resistance, although Laon was under siege until they submitted. Brittany also remained loyal to the League, however this was mainly due to support from France and in order to 'correct' this situation Henry IV declared war on Spain in January 1595.

  1. Arabi israli conflict

    The main reason was that no other country felt they could defeat them and the Israelis believed they were fighting for the nation's survival so this increases their claim to the land. There is still conflict going on today because both the Arabs and Israelis think it's theirs and they

  2. The Habsburg Valois Rivalry

    A major cost of warfare was payment for mercenary troops. France used Swiss and German mercenaries. Also sieges lasted longer = more cost. Latter stages of the HVR was characterised by sieges i.e. Metz in 1552, St Quentin in 1557 and Calais in 1558.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work