• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was England able to defeat Napoleon by 1815?

Extracts from this document...


Why was England able to defeat Napoleon by 1815? England was able to defeat Napoleon due to various factors, which led to his long-term downfall such as the war in Russia. England co-operated with the Allies who defeated Napoleon but England can be seen as the driving force behind the coalition, who won the crucial victory at Trafalgar and then again at Waterloo, which finally defeated Napoleon. A big factor in the defeat of Napoleon was England's dogged determination to achieve their objective as being the victor in the war with Napoleon. This determination caused many problems for Napoleon since only England's presence in the war was enough to influence Napoleon to try and gain the upperhand against England somehow. To begin with, Napoleon set up the Continental Blockade against Britain, which was designed to 'bring the nation of shopkeepers' to their knees by cutting off their trade. However, resilience of British traders proved a problem, as they sought and obtained new outlets in South American and managed, from wartime distribution centers like Heligoland and Malta, to keep illicit commercial contacts with Prussia. ...read more.


The French economy was constantly being drained, and this became worse when the British army intervened after their ports in Spain were attacked. The Iberian Peninsula war became one of the key turning points in the downfall of Napoleon, along with the Russian war. The French were fighting in two fronts and so were defeated in Spain, and defeated in Russia with a loss of 700 000 men. The failure of the continental system again was responsible for Napoleon invading Russia, but Napoleon himself at the time became war obsessed, relying on war to generate and fund another war. In Russia, burning of crops tactics was used and the French could not handle this since they normally lived off the land. The French were told to believe that at Moscow they would receive all the pleasures of life, but they only found the city burnt down. This totally bedazzled Napoleon, but more importantly sapped the morale of the soldiers. This is a fault with Napoleon's tactics since although he successfully used these tactics earlier; he did not develop them while the Allies did giving them an advantage. ...read more.


Napoleon, who was off the battlefield, had left Ney in charge and he ordered the French to charge. If Napoleon had been there, it might have been a different story but he wasn't and so the end result was that the French was met by British soldiers arranged in squares who fired in all directions in all directions. They were slaughtered. This bad leadership by Ney did not just show once. He even ordered the cavalry to charge at the British without any infantry support and the French lost even more men and morale. Leipzig may have caused Napoleon to abdicate, but Waterloo caused him to be defeated forever. The British played an important part in the defeat of Napoleon since they provided the backbone to any French opposition, and to the Allies who defeated Napoleon at Leipzig. The Battle of Waterloo shows the hatred between Britain and France since they fought passionately, but ultimately the British influence on the Allies and the actions of Napoleon which influenced the Allies too, caused the Prussians to arrive and signal the end for Napoleon. Umair Khalid Mr Pedley History 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    The Congress of Vienna had acted quickly when they heard of Napoleon's escape and all the major powers had contributed 150 000 troops to an invasion force to assemble in Belgium near the French border. In Paris Napoleon had a lot to think about.

  2. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    Russia in world war one is an example of how a failing economy was unable to fight a large scale war; inflation got out of control and infrastructure failed, Russia could no longer afford to be in the war and had to withdraw.

  1. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    This is another factor contributing towards Napoleon's downfall, as his "glorious peace with honour" never gave the continent a chance of stability, with fresh outbreaks of war inevitable even after such crushing defeats as that at Austerlitz and Jena, especially when Britain was still pulling the strings from afar.

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    in 1859 a war with Austria makes little sense at the cost of thousands of French lives and millions of Francs, in 1863 Russia completely ignores the French government over Polish nationalism showing contempt for Napoleon III's government and in 1867 Napoleon wasted French lives campaigning in Mexico with little

  1. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    In May 1815 Napoleon ordered twenty thousand troops to quell the insurrection. The men assigned to that task, where not present in the battle of Waterloo and Napoleon later mourned that these added troops may have been enough to have won.4 Another problem was with the number of troops in the army.

  2. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    Grouchy was ordered to stop the Prussian army-reaching waterloo. He had 33000 men, the Prussians amassed to only 15000. The men grouchy had, could've been used with great affect if he had used some initiative. However he did not, so they were not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work