• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III?

Extracts from this document...


Why was Henry Tudor able to overthrow Richard III? There were many different factors that aided Henry in his overthrow of Richard. Commynes, their contemporary said he was a "virtuous Prince", implying it was his personal qualities that aided his cause. Many historians say that it was Richard III's qualities that made him vulnerable, John Rous likening him to a scorpion with a "smooth front" yet a "stinging tail". Although Ross implied that the events at Bosworth and the treachery of his nobles were the downfall of Richard, saying, "never again were the attitudes of three or four over-mighty subjects able to exercise so decisive an influence on the survival or death of an English Monarch". Although, a thought that cannot be ignored is that the outcome of Bosworth may have just been an unlucky and remarkable occurrence because not since 1066 had the English throne been won by an adventurer with such obscure claims as Henry Tudor. Even the events of 1688 when William of Orange overthrew James II have insufficient parallel with what happened at Bosworth. Richard III is reputable by many for being the most hated king in history for many reasons. The nature of his usurpation almost condemned him from the beginning, Richard made no attempt to quash the rumour that he had murdered his nephews; Richard would not even produce the boys! ...read more.


This treachery at Bosworth again gave Henry greater advantage and although many say Richard was a courageous leader in battle, he failed to bring around all the "super magnates" during his reign. Richard's fate depended on his greatest magnates, aristocratic power and this was concentrated on three people and only one of these magnates was loyal, John Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Richard was unable to keep Lord Stanley and the Stanley's unreliability was compounded by the fact he was married to Henry Tudor's mother. Northumberland was angered by Richard's instatement of his nephew as leader of the "Council of the North" and therefore did not stay loyal to Richard. This failure meant Henry Tudor had even more advantage over him. Events at Bosworth underlined Richard's tendency to act quickly without fully thinking out the consequences because he put everything on the outcome of one battle. The treachery in Richard's ranks (caused by his inability to keep all of his nobles happy) meant that although Richard's army outnumbered Tudor's he was let down by Northumberland's inability to engage his force, which was large and well equipped. The lack of support at his critical hour reflected Richard's mismanagement of patronage earlier in his reign. The vanguard success of the earl of Oxford against the loyal duke of Norfolk meant Henry Tudor had an advantage and the Stanley's who were renowned for their tendency to change sides at the last moment were also the cause of Richard's downfall and Henry's ascension. ...read more.


These informants meant that Henry could be one step ahead of his opposition. As Henry lived in France and had done so since 1471 no one knew anything about him, he had no bad reputation like Richard and no apparent baggage from his past, unlike Richard. This freedom he gained from being abroad meant that he could act to gain support and plan campaigns. The only other alternative that had claim was male (although of female descent) and of age was John, the earl of Lincoln. However, John of Lincoln was loyal to Richard, and therefore was not a very good alternative to the King they despised. Henry, in the eyes of the subjects of Richard was perfect, he had claim through the line of John of Gaunt and had Lancastrian credentials. The Lancastrians were the enemies of the Yorkists and therefore, he the ideal alternative. Although there were many different reasons for Henry Tudor's support during Richard's reign and after his death, the main reasons were Richard III himself and Henry Tudor's attractiveness in comparison. All of the aspects of Henry's support - his personal qualities, the support of Henry by the French and attitude of the French government towards Richard and the events at Bosworth were all for the same underlying issue, they all wanted Richard off the throne and Henry was their only alternative. Rous concluded that "Although Richard III's days were short, they were ended with no lamentation from his groaning subjects." 12/12/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why Richard III was able to usurp the throne of England in June ...

    4 star(s)

    plotting with the Woodville's and extra charge of treason was placed on Hastings and he was executed. Richard and Hastings were good friends and this showed that Richard was ruthless just like his older brother. It was now that the skill and plotting of Richard was being shown as h

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    On the 22nd of August the battle was to be fought in Leistershire, in an open field near Bosworth. The Stanleys were also present but on their own. They did not side with either camp. On the morning of the battle the Stanley's were to the north west of the

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    the Council of the North chaired by the earl of Lincoln who was an outsider to northern affairs. Thomas Lord Stanley was also important by his ability to change sides at the most opportune moment. Due to Richard III's failure to firmly secure Lord Stanley on his side, Stanley intervened

  2. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    The deal said that Richard III would have Henry Tudor in exchange for protection against France as Brittany is a small island between England and France which feared being invaded. However, Henry Tudor was warned about the deal and he fled from Brittany to France.

  1. Disraeli an unprincipled adventurer in politics

    by Lady Henrietta Sykes.4 Therefore one can say that through his background, fundamental beliefs and social circles, Disraeli was a natural Conservative in the same way that Gladstone was a natural Liberal However, for many historians these are not the main reasons as to why Disraeli became a Conservative MP.

  2. Did Richard III lose the Throne, or did Henry Tudor gain it?

    Richard knew that his popularity had been diminished and was desperately clinging to any attempt to strengthen his claim to the throne.

  1. How was Isabella able to secure her succession to the Castilian throne in 1469-1479?

    Convinced of Ferdinand's influence in helping him, by the end of 1472 the entire Mendoza family switched their support to Isabella. To have such an influential family as a key supporter was important in Isabella's eventual triumph. Once Queen, in order to consolidate her position, she had to improve her relationship with the Castilian grandees.

  2. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    As for Western, the increase of tax hit the peasants and the nobility benefitted because of the dissolution of monasteries. During this time, they also encountered problems, which were the main cause for the rebellion, the issue of religion. The Tudors did not experience problems with economy and social resentment

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work