• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was it Stalin and not Trotsky who emerged as the leader of the USSR by 1929?

Extracts from this document...


Why was it Stalin and not Trotsky who emerged as the leader of the USSR by 1929? After Lenin's death in 1924, there were 5 main possible candidates including Stalin, Trotsky, Kamanev, Zinoviev and Bukharin. However, the two that were in contention for Lenin's position were Trotsky and Stalin. Stalin was a very clever man, and very devious. An example of this was at Lenin's funeral. Stalin informed Trotsky the incorrect date of the event. This made Trotsky look very bad. Stalin was a ruthless man, and he made his enemies suffer one by one. Stalin's role in the communist party as General Secretary gave him immense authority. He had the power to hire, fire and promote who he felt necessary within the party. This meant that he could fire anyone in the party who he felt was a threat to him, and could hire people he trusted into high important positions. As well as this, he could organise meetings and schedule them to his own accordance which also helped him get into power. ...read more.


This was another reason that Stalin emerged as leader and not Trotsky, because Communism at home was more popular than World Communism. In 1923, at the Twelfth Party Congress, Trotsky refused to make a principle speech in place of Lenin. Instead, Stalin did who successfully dominated, whilst skilfully agreeing with Lenin's complaints about Russians trying to dominate other nationalities in the USSR. These complaints had originally been made by Lenin at Stalin, and although Trotsky could have weakened Stalin by acting upon this, he failed to do so, thus letting a great opportunity slip away. As well as this, Zinoviev was becoming concerned with Stalin's increasing power. Stalin deceivingly offered to resign, and Zinoviev turned his attention to Trotsky. This was also a big reason why Stalin emerged as leader, since once again, he had been underestimated, and was not considered a threat when really he truly was. Factionalism meant that groups who tried to disagree with the official policy and party leadership would be banned. ...read more.


By 1926, Stalin had gained much support, and in a last desperate attempt, Trotsky, Kamanev and Zinoviev joined forces to attack Stalin. They were known as the United Opposition but by this time there actions were too late. Stalin was too powerful by this stage, and had emerged as leader since members of the Politburo had failed to recognise him as a threat. Later in the year, they published Lenin's testament. The three were expelled from the party, and by 1927 all opposition propaganda was banned, This was enforced by the Secret Police, which were also a reason why Stalin won the leadership contest. They removed anyone who went against the government. In conclusion, as a result of Trotsky's arrogance, Stalin's skills and abilities were put aside, and he was not considered a threat until it was far too late. Stalin's deviance and ruthlessness helped him to eliminate the opposition, such as his clever funeral trick, and his views on Russian policies won over the Russian people. It is because of these factors, that Stalin emerged as leader of the USSR and not Trotsky. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    By 1917, he had become the editor of Pravda, the Bolshevik newspaper and had taken a minor role in the Bolshevik seizure of power. Stalin was a loyal Bolshevik who supposedly supported Lenin and was in charge of the party organisation before he came dictator.

  2. Stalin and the Modernisation of the USSR

    His two main contributions were collectivisation and industrialisation, which were extremely important both for Stalin to gain power and to help modernisation. Stalin needed collectivisation for money to modernise the industry, because he couldn't get funding from other countries, because nobody was willing to fund a Communist nation.

  1. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    Without Trotsky, success may not have come so easy as he was such a popular figure people were happy to enrol and the fact that he was such a good leader helped the Bolsheviks to win the battle once again.

  2. Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader ...

    There was also the power struggle. In this there were 4 main factors that Stalin manipulated. These Were: * Factionalism * The N.E.P. * Socialism In One Country/ permanent Revolution * His Power Base Factionalism was the Idea that if a member of the party discusses ideas which did not have the majority vote by the party.

  1. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    As this made other contenders want him to be on their side because he could deliver votes in the congress. However it was not only due to Stalin's politics and character that he emerged as leader, but to a man named Leon Trotsky he failed on many occasions to step up to the challenge as leader.

  2. Why did Stalin and not Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR by ...

    Trotsky reemphasised on his old theory of "permanent revolution", which was basically his stand that communism should spread beyond Russia and that a quick swift proletariat revolution should take place from the bourgeois to the socialist stage. He said that "October" had been the crucial stage in Party history, as

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The private enterprise part meant that some people were making a profit out of other?s labour. This went against the principle of public good and of Socialism. 2. Economic divisions meant class differences increased: the new bourgeoisie were formed (these people were enemies of Socialism).

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Lenin had promised to end the War. And he did. But at what cost? Yes, Lenin got his peace but his poor judgement and obsession with ending the War lead to a very harsh treaty, the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Lenin�s theory was to obtain peace at any price, this was an idea which Lenin took too far.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work