Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR

Authors Avatar

                                                                                                                  Josef Fleming

Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR

Trotsky was a leading Bolshevik and played a pivotal role in the revolution, persuading Lenin to delay the revolution until the Bolshevik’s had a much stronger place in the country. He also was crucial to the civil war, as he organised the troops and motivated them. Stalin on the other hand was in charge of all the dull jobs within the Bolshevik party and In Lenin’s last Testament, he was referred to as rude and he needed to be removed. So why did Stalin, and not Trotsky emerge as Lenin’s successor. It’s a mixture of Stalin’s luck and skill, and Trotsky’s misfortune, which will be explained in the following paragraphs.

Join now!

Stalin had a good run of luck following Lenin’s death, as firstly Lenin’s testament was published, which stated he was rude, and needed to be removed. It wasn’t published because it criticised other leading party members. Also Trotsky couldn’t attend Lenin’s funeral, which gave Stalin the chance to name himself “Lenin’s disciple” this was a big misfortune on Trotsky’s part.

There was also the power struggle. In this there were 4 main factors that Stalin manipulated. These Were:

  • Factionalism
  • The N.E.P.
  • Socialism In One Country/ permanent Revolution
  • His Power Base

Factionalism was the Idea ...

This is a preview of the whole essay