• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Josef Fleming Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR Trotsky was a leading Bolshevik and played a pivotal role in the revolution, persuading Lenin to delay the revolution until the Bolshevik's had a much stronger place in the country. He also was crucial to the civil war, as he organised the troops and motivated them. Stalin on the other hand was in charge of all the dull jobs within the Bolshevik party and In Lenin's last Testament, he was referred to as rude and he needed to be removed. So why did Stalin, and not Trotsky emerge as Lenin's successor. ...read more.

Middle

There were 2 main Ideas about the N.E.P. , these were the left wing and the right wing. The left wing said it should go and the right wing said it should stay as it would aid Industrialisation, as it allowed free trade to sell goods on the open market which would give money into the open market. Stalin's powerbase was due to him being the general secretary, who was in charge of recruiting people, so when the Lenin enrolment scheme was introduced, Stalin recruited "malleable recruits who wouldn't be impressed by Trotsky's intellect. This was skill on Stalin's part, but also a mistake on Trotsky's behalf, as he had paid no attention previously to Stalin, calling him a "grey blur" Permanent Revolution was the idea that Russia would change, but at the same time help other countries to change and receive their help. ...read more.

Conclusion

After this, Stalin turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev and sided with Bukharin. Here, Stalin unveils his idea of Socialism in one country, this idea gains much support, mainly from all of the recruits that Stalin chose during Lenin enrolment, and here he has turned on his previous allies about the N.E.P. And then Zinoviev and Kamenev teamed up with Trotsky and together they published Lenin's last testament to try and discredit Stalin, however they were expelled from the party for factionalism. And after his three main rivals for power had been expelled, he turned on Bukharin. We notice that all the way through the struggle for power, he has relied on his power base for support. The success of Stalin was due to the fact that he had an incredible amount of luck, and also that all of his opponents seemed to underestimate him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Into this milieu Lenin had stepped, and had called not only for fraternization with the enemy and a policy of no confidence in the government, but also for an end to any silly talk of unity among the Social Democrats.

  2. Why did Stalin and not Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR by ...

    Stalin, on the other hand, appeared neutral and pointed out, seemingly without bias, that Trotsky was, after all, just a newcomer to Party ranks. Stalin then proposed a plan of his own - Socialism in one Country. What this basically meant was that Russia should industrialise fully before embarking on a "Spread Communism to the World" policy.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    Stalin also added several supporters to the list of candidate members of the Politburo and to the newly enlarged Central Committee. Shortly before, Voroshilov had replaced Michael Frunze, who had been named Trotsky's successor but had died soon afterward, as war commissar.

  2. A Night to remember - Invincible. That was the sole word in the English ...

    It turned out that I have a rare blood group and if I were wounded they might not be able to find a blood supply to transfuse. I felt betrayed, let down by my own country. All that I wanted to do was fight, I didn't care if I died,

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    left to arrange the funeral, and appear as Lenin's chief mourner in front of thousands. The touching service given by Stalin enabled him to keep the thousands of witnesses, any many more under the illusion that he was Lenin's faithful disciple.

  2. Why was it Stalin and not Trotsky who emerged as the leader of the ...

    After Lenin's death, Trotsky wanted to spread Communism all over the world. In response, Stalin claimed this would lead to war, and introduced his ideas of Communism at home. This was much more appealing, as the Russians really did not want to go to war after all the troubles they'd had in World War One, and the Civil War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work