• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Josef Fleming Why Was It That Stalin, and not Trotsky that emerged as the sole leader of the USSR Trotsky was a leading Bolshevik and played a pivotal role in the revolution, persuading Lenin to delay the revolution until the Bolshevik's had a much stronger place in the country. He also was crucial to the civil war, as he organised the troops and motivated them. Stalin on the other hand was in charge of all the dull jobs within the Bolshevik party and In Lenin's last Testament, he was referred to as rude and he needed to be removed. So why did Stalin, and not Trotsky emerge as Lenin's successor. ...read more.

Middle

There were 2 main Ideas about the N.E.P. , these were the left wing and the right wing. The left wing said it should go and the right wing said it should stay as it would aid Industrialisation, as it allowed free trade to sell goods on the open market which would give money into the open market. Stalin's powerbase was due to him being the general secretary, who was in charge of recruiting people, so when the Lenin enrolment scheme was introduced, Stalin recruited "malleable recruits who wouldn't be impressed by Trotsky's intellect. This was skill on Stalin's part, but also a mistake on Trotsky's behalf, as he had paid no attention previously to Stalin, calling him a "grey blur" Permanent Revolution was the idea that Russia would change, but at the same time help other countries to change and receive their help. ...read more.

Conclusion

After this, Stalin turned on Zinoviev and Kamenev and sided with Bukharin. Here, Stalin unveils his idea of Socialism in one country, this idea gains much support, mainly from all of the recruits that Stalin chose during Lenin enrolment, and here he has turned on his previous allies about the N.E.P. And then Zinoviev and Kamenev teamed up with Trotsky and together they published Lenin's last testament to try and discredit Stalin, however they were expelled from the party for factionalism. And after his three main rivals for power had been expelled, he turned on Bukharin. We notice that all the way through the struggle for power, he has relied on his power base for support. The success of Stalin was due to the fact that he had an incredible amount of luck, and also that all of his opponents seemed to underestimate him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    Whilst these ideas were supported by many extreme left wing members, they were extremely unpopular amongst right wing members, such as Zinoviev and Kamenev who even allied with Stalin to contain Trotsky.

  2. Why did Stalin and not Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR by ...

    However, this theory was overshadowed by the struggle between Trotsky and the duo of Zinoniev and Kamenev. In January 1925, the Central Committee removed Trotsky from the War Commissariat, even though he remained in possession of a seat in the Politburo. Although not totally crushed, Trotsky receded into the background.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    This was the decisive blow. Although he was still not completely crushed, Trotsky receded to the background. If he had been another kind of man, he might have tried to use the Red Army against his adversaries, but his loyalty to the Party was paramount, and he accepted his deposition without trying to resist.

  2. A Night to remember - Invincible. That was the sole word in the English ...

    I just wanted to be part of the mighty war machine that I knew would one day crush Nazi Germany. It had come to this, but I had no other option. I wanted to help in the war effort, but as I couldn't be involved in active service, peeling potatoes

  1. Why was it Stalin and not Trotsky who emerged as the leader of the ...

    After Lenin's death, Trotsky wanted to spread Communism all over the world. In response, Stalin claimed this would lead to war, and introduced his ideas of Communism at home. This was much more appealing, as the Russians really did not want to go to war after all the troubles they'd had in World War One, and the Civil War.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2. Some high-quality achievements e.g. in defence production. 3. The USSR became almost self-sufficient in some areas like machine tool production. 4. Some degree of industrial modernisation. 1. Not all targets were met, e.g. in the chemical industry, through inefficiency. 2. Although quality did improve, many products remained of poor quality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work