• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Progress for Racial Equality so slow in the years 1945-1955?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Progress for Racial Equality so slow in the years 1945-1955? Any progress for racial equality during the period of 1945-1955 faced a series of problems, both through the Government and legal means and the American public, slowing down and limiting its affect overall during this time period. Any effect of measures for racial equality were also limited for the same reasons, making the development of racial equality on the whole incredibly slow. Presidents of America during this time period played their own part in slowing down progress. Truman (1945-53) in principle may not have been racist man that does not mean however that his stance on civil rights was in favour of racial equality. His attitude towards their plight was seemingly ignorant and his own awareness for his need for the southern vote made him wary to bring about change. His committee on civil rights in 1946 outlined only basic requirements for all Americans but even that failed to pass congress. Eisenhower (1953-61) contributed to the progress of racial equality during this period even less. His intervention in the state of Arkansas on the issue of Little Rock can be seen as progress as Federal Government interfered with states on the issue ...read more.

Middle

Progress for racial equality didn't just come through the courts or the intervention of Government, the opinion of the American public was very important during this time, not only because changing public opinion helped with racial equality but also because racist public opinion was something slowing down and stopping racial equality during these years. Even if white Americans were becoming aware of black equality (through the use of television, the car and overall public opinion regarding human rights) and this level publicity for the cause helped, white racist opinion resistant to change in the south was becoming more prominent in the post war years. A strong anti-communist feeling after the war also added to the resistant of civil rights protesters and they were often unfairly linked, resulting, in some cases, heavy resistance to NAACP activities, slowing down progress of individual civil rights groups such as the NAACP and Scope. Fear as an issue itself was a very major obstacle in the way of racial equality and it showed itself to be highly versatile in slowing or even stopping progress in most areas. As well as politicians and the federal Government fearing the loss of voters on the issue of civil rights, black Americans themselves were often fearful of farthing the progress, participating or even registering to vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

But even with a case such as this progress was extremely slow, the period itself from when the petition was initially signed to when it came to the Supreme Court was drawn out for years. The outcome of the case didn't mean, however, that the problem was then solved and that the progress, however slow, helped massively during the years 1945-1955. The process of desegregation was not only then faced by white racists protesting against but also an unwillingness of black population mainly due to fear for blacks to attempt to even follow this ruling, slowing down the actual affect this law had on racial equality and its overall progress. To summarise any one problem which as more significant throughout this period in slowing down the process of racial equality isn't to say that just one issue was more important than any other but to show how the presence of fear at every stage of the campaign for racial equality was present and having the biggest detrimental affect. This problem of fear throughout the years 1945-1955 in not only present every stage of advancement (courts, government, politicians) but also can be seen as the most prominent problem in slowing down the process, then in turn progress, of racial equality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a good answer that focused well on the question throughout and shows a strong understanding of what slowed progress. The conclusion and introduction could both be improved.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 10/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The New Deal USA

    4 star(s)

    The Cartoonist presents the President and the New Deal as a deception and untrustworthy which implies that Roosevelt was not every American's hero and not everyone was convinced that the New Deal was a success. O'Callaghan writes that "to millions of Americans, [Roosevelt] was the man who had given them jobs" and therefore the New Deal policies were a success.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent was the 1920s a major turning point in the development of ...

    4 star(s)

    The turning point for this era was marked with the establishment of the National Labour Union (NLU) in 1866. In total contrast to before, the NLU aimed to form a single association which represented labourers of all crafts and which would draw a mass membership.

  1. To what extent was WW2 the most significant turning point for civil rights

    introduced a new method of Black Nationalism and violence in response to white oppression. This did little to further the social standing of blacks, apart from perhaps create a sense of fear amongst white communities, and also by no means convinced law makers of the necessity of civil rights but

  2. To what extent was the economic boom of the 1920s caused by the development ...

    this as their was no fear over the stability of the economy. Also, people were becoming increasingly more aware of the possibilities of people becoming overstretched or of them losing their jobs, resulting in them being unable to pay back any of the money borrowed to purchase the goods.

  1. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    the majority of the population could purchase them when in reality less than half of the population could afford them, leaving them with awful amounts of surplus stock that they could not sell. This was most true in the consumer goods market, as it appeared more and more of the

  2. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    During the election of 1948, Truman's approval ratings were down and it seemed as if he would not win. However, that same year he issued both of his executive orders relating to civil rights, upping his approval ratings. Though the support he had gained from farmers, laborers, African Americans, and

  1. How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the ...

    Although he showed his support in the Little Rock Campaign, he was reluctant to help the civil rights movement as he felt that it wasn?t the government?s duty to improve conditions for black people and that it would improve over time.

  2. Immigration to the USA - write a letter home from a new immigrant

    Thankfully, I had imagined that this would be the case as I was packing and thus decided it would be necessary to only bring a pen to write this letter, our last picture we took together as we walked in the snow to Christmas eve mass, and documentations of my farming experience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work