• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Progress for Racial Equality so slow in the years 1945-1955?

Extracts from this document...


Why was Progress for Racial Equality so slow in the years 1945-1955? Any progress for racial equality during the period of 1945-1955 faced a series of problems, both through the Government and legal means and the American public, slowing down and limiting its affect overall during this time period. Any effect of measures for racial equality were also limited for the same reasons, making the development of racial equality on the whole incredibly slow. Presidents of America during this time period played their own part in slowing down progress. Truman (1945-53) in principle may not have been racist man that does not mean however that his stance on civil rights was in favour of racial equality. His attitude towards their plight was seemingly ignorant and his own awareness for his need for the southern vote made him wary to bring about change. His committee on civil rights in 1946 outlined only basic requirements for all Americans but even that failed to pass congress. Eisenhower (1953-61) contributed to the progress of racial equality during this period even less. His intervention in the state of Arkansas on the issue of Little Rock can be seen as progress as Federal Government interfered with states on the issue ...read more.


Progress for racial equality didn't just come through the courts or the intervention of Government, the opinion of the American public was very important during this time, not only because changing public opinion helped with racial equality but also because racist public opinion was something slowing down and stopping racial equality during these years. Even if white Americans were becoming aware of black equality (through the use of television, the car and overall public opinion regarding human rights) and this level publicity for the cause helped, white racist opinion resistant to change in the south was becoming more prominent in the post war years. A strong anti-communist feeling after the war also added to the resistant of civil rights protesters and they were often unfairly linked, resulting, in some cases, heavy resistance to NAACP activities, slowing down progress of individual civil rights groups such as the NAACP and Scope. Fear as an issue itself was a very major obstacle in the way of racial equality and it showed itself to be highly versatile in slowing or even stopping progress in most areas. As well as politicians and the federal Government fearing the loss of voters on the issue of civil rights, black Americans themselves were often fearful of farthing the progress, participating or even registering to vote. ...read more.


But even with a case such as this progress was extremely slow, the period itself from when the petition was initially signed to when it came to the Supreme Court was drawn out for years. The outcome of the case didn't mean, however, that the problem was then solved and that the progress, however slow, helped massively during the years 1945-1955. The process of desegregation was not only then faced by white racists protesting against but also an unwillingness of black population mainly due to fear for blacks to attempt to even follow this ruling, slowing down the actual affect this law had on racial equality and its overall progress. To summarise any one problem which as more significant throughout this period in slowing down the process of racial equality isn't to say that just one issue was more important than any other but to show how the presence of fear at every stage of the campaign for racial equality was present and having the biggest detrimental affect. This problem of fear throughout the years 1945-1955 in not only present every stage of advancement (courts, government, politicians) but also can be seen as the most prominent problem in slowing down the process, then in turn progress, of racial equality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a good answer that focused well on the question throughout and shows a strong understanding of what slowed progress. The conclusion and introduction could both be improved.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 10/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the ...

    5 star(s)

    Another individual which had little short term significance in reducing racial discrimination was Marcus Garvey, who unlike Du Bois and Washington believed that blacks and whites could not co-exist and they should be separate, he held the belief that African Americans had to start their own nation in order to advance.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    cause of working themselves out of poverty and to improve the black condition. As a northerner who had experienced the troubles of the ghetto and come out as a better man, he was able to be more of a role model for young people than the educated southerner, King.

  1. Attempts to enforce Prohibition in the USA were doomed to fail. How far do ...

    In addition, other factors had a major impact on Prohibitions failure, such as there were major flaws with the treasury agents employed to enforce Prohibition. These treasury agents were only paid 2500 dollars to break up an industry worth two billion dollars, and further problems with the geography of the

  2. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    the majority of the population could purchase them when in reality less than half of the population could afford them, leaving them with awful amounts of surplus stock that they could not sell. This was most true in the consumer goods market, as it appeared more and more of the

  1. To what extent was WW2 the most significant turning point for civil rights

    introduced a new method of Black Nationalism and violence in response to white oppression. This did little to further the social standing of blacks, apart from perhaps create a sense of fear amongst white communities, and also by no means convinced law makers of the necessity of civil rights but

  2. Does Abraham Lincoln deserve his reputation as one of the greatest of American presidents?

    He firmly and fairly guided the nation through its most perilous period and made a lasting impact in shaping the office of chief executive. Lincoln was a president for all, regardless of their position. His domestic policies included support for the Homestead Act of 1862.

  1. Why did the Civil Rights Movement emerge in the 1950s?

    The third important example of direct action, Little Rock, occurred in 1957. The hypocrisy of the cold war played a huge part in this case as Eisenhower was forced to take action in order to remain looking good and to avoid feeling and looking extremely embarrassed and civil rights used the sensitivity of the war to pressure the government.

  2. To what extent was the economic boom of the 1920s caused by the development ...

    not have been able to afford and therefore meant more sales for companies fuelling the boom. By 1927, $7 billion of goods, such as 75% of all cars and half of all major household appliances, were sold on credit. This meant that more goods were being sold to working classes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work