• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was progress towards racial equality slow in the period 1945?

Extracts from this document...


Why was progress towards racial equality so slow in the period 1945-1955? There are many reasons why progress towards racial equality was so slow in the period of 1945-1955, however the most important reason was the opposition Truman faced by white politicians. In 1946, Truman set up a committee to discuss civil rights; he commissioned them to produce a report examining the experience of racial minorities in America. This report, 'To secure these rights', highlighted the vast amount of segregation that faced African Americans, this report proposed changes to make America a desegregated society. However Truman was unwilling to implement the full recommendations of the report. This was due to opposition from southern Democrats; they had powerful positions within Congress and would use these to block Truman's plans. ...read more.


Despite growth in the North, Black American's still suffered segregation in certain Southern States; Black American's were often regarded as second class citizens. This is why there was little progress made, as there was little support between the government and the public. Even though there were many methods of protest against segregation, these were ineffective. Campaigns were not co-ordinated to create maximum impact. Groups such as the NAACP and CORE did not have enough members, to make their protest effective to the public. Also protests which they carried out were not carried out for a long amount of time. One example of this was when the UDL (who were part of the NAACP) ...read more.


Despite there being effects of desegregation, there still was widespread discrimination. This was mainly due to there being little impact throughout the country. For example, protests about schools and buses were only small, and therefore there was little protest made. Due to such a high level of discrimination, the government didn't know where to start; consequently the life for Black Americans was difficult to counter for. In conclusion, the main reason there was little progress made towards racial equality in the period 1945-1955, was due to the government and their views towards President Truman. Despite being able to provide new legislation to states within the country, it was automatically the Governments decision whether this was going to be implemented. ?? ?? ?? ?? Hannah Griffiths 12H Mrs Davies As History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the ...

    5 star(s)

    the civil rights movement, the NACCP was still a vital element in setting the foundation of the civil rights movement for the future. Although individuals had led the campaign for civil rights for African Americans throughout the early 20th century and towards the end of the 19th, as WWII commenced

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why was Progress for Racial Equality so slow in the years 1945-1955?

    4 star(s)

    The system of Government in the USA runs on the premise of a Federal Government and individual State Governments. This system in itself had a way of slowing down progress. Any laws made by the federal Government are first passed by a two third majority of states to enable to

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    They found it hard to register to vote, usually by intimidation but sometimes by forcing them to pass a test in order to vote. They were terrorised by the local Ku Klux Klan, and could expect little protection from the police.

  2. How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the ...

    New Deal he believed it was a communist conspiracy, yet he too fought for similar polices which I believe worsened his credibility, overall his authority and strength did impact the economy, his significance undoubtedly was there yet lost popularity consequently losing his radio program, but he was too radical to

  1. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    Lyndon Johnson also took a risk, but in a different way. In both Truman and Eisenhower's speeches, they avoided directing referring to blacks, but rather referred generally to "segregation." In Lyndon Johnson's speeches, particularly his speech The American Promise, he directly states the many problems that face "Negroes."12 He is

  2. Why was the progress towards the achievement of civil rights so slow in the ...

    He also did not believe that it was appropriate to interfere in individual state matters, although general consensus suggests that if he had shown strong leadership then the bill would have been put into practice at greater speeds. He believed that race relations would gradually improve on their own accord.

  1. Why was progress towards racial equality so slow in the period 1945 - 1955?

    In 1946, Truman set up at committee created to discuss Civil Rights which enabled him to commission a report examining the experience of racial minorities in America and the difficulties that they faced. This report, ?To Secure These Rights?, highlighted the vast amount of problems African Americans faced and proposed

  2. How much and why did President Truman help to promote racial equality?

    and set up the Fair Employment Board to ensure fair employment in the civil service. Truman?s administration also mounted pressure on the Supreme Court by supporting the NAACP in the case of Shelley v. Kraemer, which resulted in a victory for civil rights advocates as it removed laws that stopped

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work