• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866? 1866 saw a complete change in the political structure of the German speaking nations, Prussia finally broke free of the shackles imposed on her by a dominant Austria. Since the 15th century, Austria had always been considered the natural leader of the German states. The Habsburg family had always been accustomed to ruling and dominating, Habsburgs had been Kings or Dukes of Austria, Hungary, Spain, Italian States, France. It can be seen here that the Habsburg family and therefore Austria (Franz Joseph I, was a Habsburg) had a traditional role as head of the German states. Throughout the 19th century, Austria had always been ultra-conservative, Metternich is a prime example of 19th century ultra- conservatism. Austria aimed to keep power and continue to dominate despite the role of an increasing powerful Prussia. Someone once said, "The one thing people in power are afraid of is losing that power," the ultra-conservative policies of Metternich and the Habsburg government in the Vormarz period shows this point perfectly. They censored newspapers in order to silence liberals and nationalists, they created the Bund out of the ashes of the Holy Roman Empire and they refused to acknowledge the power of Prussia. Even up to 1866, these conservative attitudes lingered throughout the Habsburg empire. Prussia, on the other hand, was always accustomed to following Austria's lead. Prussia grew significantly from 1848 to 1866 but until Bismarck the King Fredrick William IV, always took the traditionalist approach rather than breaking away from a weakened Austria. ...read more.

Middle

Some nations were very quick to employ this new technology notably Britain, France and Prussia but others were more concerned with other matters other than war e.g. Austria. The countries who did not have this new weapon technology relied on weapon designs that were over 50 years old so they were at an obvious disadvantage. Prussia was able to win the Seven Weeks War because of military strength because she had instituted reforms which made the army more fluid and larger, through advanced tactics and strategy she had developed a comprehensive plan to defeat Austria. Prussia was equipped with new Dreyfus needle guns (breech loading) while the Austrians were still using flintlock muskets. So it could be said that the Prussian were much more prepared for war than Austria due to the actions of Von Roon and Molke and so were easily able to win a war when it finally came. Prussia was also able to win the Seven Weeks War because of the international situation of the 1860's. In 1854, Russia had aimed for territory conquest and aimed her sights on Ottoman territory in the Balkans, the Ottomans and Russians entered into a state of war which reached a stalemate. Britain and France did not want Russia to become too powerful so entered the war on the Ottomans side, Russia called upon its ally Austria to join the war on her side but she refused because she would have no support from the Bund, Bismarck had made sure of that. Without any allies Russia was forced to surrender after the Allies attacked the Crimea. ...read more.

Conclusion

Without Bismarck's vision then the diplomatic side of the planning may never had gone ahead and no matter how brilliant a general Molke was he would be unlikely to win against a coalition against Prussia. Prussia was able to win the Seven Weeks War because due to Bismarck's vision the conditions for war were set perfectly in Prussia's favour through diplomacy and intelligence. Bismarck had correctly calculated Austria's actions and it had paid off, but would this have happened without Bismarck? To conclude, there are a number of reasons why Prussia won the war of 1866, perhaps the most significant is the economic conditions of both Austria and Prussia, Austria was weak and was getting weaker and Prussia was becoming richer and more powerful, through powerful economics Prussia was able to build a modern powerful army while Austria couldn't afford to reform its own, therefore Prussia's army would be stronger and therefore there is one reason why Prussia won the Seven Weeks War. Another significant reason is the diplomatic situation partly due to Bismarck and partly due to Austria's selfishness, Bismarck had engineered a war on two fronts for Austria whilst securing Prussia against the same thing. Austria had alienated herself and so she had no friends to count on when Prussia attacked whilst Prussia had Italy. The Seven Weeks War of 1866 is a turning point in German history it marks a point where Prussia takes over from Austria as the dominant power in Germany. It puts Prussia into the saddle of a united Germany and therefore puts Germany into the saddle of Europe. David Ireland L6PDB Acknowledgements Germany 1848-1914 Whitfield Europe Reshaped 1848-78 Grenville The Unification of Germany 1815-90 Stiles and Farmer Europe: A History Davies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    But if one of the countries was attacked by another country that wasn't Russia, they would sustain a state of benevolent neutrality, which basically meant that they would provide food, arms and money, but not soldiers. One of the reasons for signing the treaty was to make Russia jealous and

  2. Vietnam war

    take a firmer stand on national reunification. In January 1959, under pressure from southern cadres who were increasingly being successfully targeted by Diem's secret police, the Central Committee of the VWP issued a secret resolution authorizing the use of armed struggle in the South. * In 1959, Diem launched the Agroville Program, its aim to 'protect' rural

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The Junkers (of whom Hindenburg was one) objected, and Hindenburg agreed with them. By the summer of 1932, Hindenburg was willing to let go of Bruening. Bruening, having neglected to win favor in the Reichstag because he had ruled by presidential decree, had no support left.

  2. The attitude of the Austrian and Prussia government towards the Unification of Germany

    For hundreds of years the Habsburgs had many duchies, archduchies and kingdoms in their family, the Habsburg were meant to rule in the eyes of the German Princes, including Fredrick William IV. Every successor of the Habsburg Empire believed he was the King of Kings, you can see this through

  1. Bismarcks appointment of Minister President of Prussia (1862) was the most important turning point ...

    been very different from that with which we are familiar if it existed at all. The creation of the Zollverein in 1834 was a critical turning point for German nationalism, formed from the Prussian Customs Union in 1818. Thomas Nipperdy described the creation of the Zollverein as "the outstanding event in all-German history".

  2. Show how Bismarck negotiated the Triple Alliance in 1882. What were the purpose ...

    The big Bulgaria was broken up and the major threat of Russian domination of the Balkans was temporarily shelved. At the same time it was not only in the interests of Austria that this was done - Germany herself was anxious to keep Russia out of the Balkans in order to extend her own influences over Turkey.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    because there would have been no tactical and political gain in a war with France or no-one there who had the diplomatic intelligence to see any gains but because Bismarck wished to unite Germany he needed either French support, which he would never get with Napoleon III, or a French

  2. How important were the Zollverein in changing the balance of power between Austria ...

    " The fact that Austria is worried about the Zollverein shows it's significance, furthermore William Carr has called the Zollverein ?The mighty lever of German unification.? while John Bowring described it as the Germanisation of the country. Austria was completely opposed to a unified Germany and wished to keep Germany as small states individually ruled by a monarch.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work