• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Bolshevik Revolution successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Katy Ross U5? Why was the Bolshevik Revolution successful? The Bolshevik Revolution was successful in many ways and unlike the February Revolution, which was unplanned, the Bolsheviks and their leader Lenin had planned the October Revolution in great detail. The Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC), which included Trotsky, Lenin and Stalin, planned the Revolution. The factors, which enhanced the Revolutions success, included Lenin's Leadership, the Red guards and Russia's weapons, the Military Revolutionary Committee, the mistakes and problems of the Provisional Government, Lenin's 'April Theses', the war and finally control of the Soviet. The first reason why the Bolshevik Revolution was successful was Lenin's leadership. The leader of the Bolshevik's, who was to change the whole course of the Revolution, had been in Switzerland when the March Revolution took place. ...read more.

Middle

This was what the people wanted to hear. Support for the Bolsheviks began to grow. The war was another reason for success. The war distinguished the Bolsheviks from any other groups. Only they opposed the war. Over the summer of 1917, people got more and more opposed to the war as shortages continued. The defeat in July sparked an enormous demonstration in Petrograd (known as 'July Days') Soldiers, sailors and workers poured onto the streets. Naturally, they turned to the Bolsheviks, the anti-war party, to lead them. But the demonstrations turned into rioting. Kerensky used this opportunity to produce evidence that seemed to show that Lenin was in the pay of the Germans. Lenin fled and other leading Bolsheviks were arrested. Kerensky became prime minister. Yet more reason for the success of the revolution were the weapons and the Red Guards. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally there were the mistakes and problems of the Provisional Government. They were weak because the actual power was in the Soviets. They did not listen to peoples needs and were slow to change and they were more interested in their own positions than in its peoples. They also continued the war against Germany, which led to many hardships: inflation, shortage of war products and daily necessities, shortages of peasants and horses leading to food shortages and finally heavy losses in the war against Germany. To conclude, I think that the most important was Lenin's theses because it promised to solve all of Russia's problems. He promised peace - ending the war against Germany and stopping the suffering of war. He promised land - peasants would regain the land that they worked so hard on. Finally, he promised bread - to end the food shortages, hunger and starvation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    His later victories were much costlier in men than the earlier ones. For example, 30,000 were lost in Wagram in 1809 compared with the 8,000 lost at Austerlitz in 1805. French loses overall in the Austrian campaign of 1809 were almost equal to those of the enemy.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    For example, workers at the armaments factories in Tula were in favour, as a rule, of continuing the war effort against the Germans, or at least of maintaining a state of armed preparedness, despite the economy's inability to support either of these two options.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    that the bourgeois government was not suitable for the new Russian republic. Not only did the Provisional Government have to contend with the opposing Petrograd Soviet, as head of state they were responsible for dealing with the new democracy. They were faced with some tough decisions that would greatly influence the Government's popularity.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The Allies, however, were not convinced by dramatic confessions, suspecting that such belated urges to confess harbored ulterior motives aimed at enhancing self-importance and pleasing the accuser. If the highest leaders of Germany did not come clean in 194S, it should not be surprising that the German people, still traumatized

  1. Journalism: The People's Witness

    'Unceasingly Nazi short-wave stations are churning out propaganda, but their most deadly propaganda does not come from the radio or the daily press, but is mingled with the daily life of the people'. This sentence to me is quite haunting in the sense that Burchett writes this article as a warning against what the Nazis may be capable of.

  2. The Bolshevik revolution

    were able to gain a majority of in both the Petrograd and Moscow soviets by October 1917. The Provisional Government became increasingly separate from mainstream society, because it continued the war and misread the mood of the people who "said that all the party had managed to do during its term of office was put up tram fares.

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    Finally, there was the inflation of the rouble, this also increased the popularity of the Bolshevik party. When Lenin lived in exile, in Serbia, he was unable to make the party exactly how he wanted it, but when Lenin arrived back in Russia in 1917, he made an immediately stir,

  2. The French Revolution Broke Out Because Of a Shortage of Bread Discuss.

    Some of the many people who attended the Estates General and were disappointed by Louis?s approach to the situation joined together and declared themselves to be a National Assembly. Together, they wanted to set up a constitution, and have a say in how France should be ruled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work