• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the first Great Reform Act passed in 1832 and not before?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was the first Great Reform Act passed in 1832 and not before? The gradual disintegration of the anti-reform Pittite majority Tory party can be seen as one of the main factors leading to the passing of the Great Reform Act in 1832. In order to understand why reform hadn't been passed before, the key factor is the domination of anti-reform politicians attributed to this, and the fact that the old system of representation was quite unsuited to the changing times. Reform had always been a likely and recurrent focus for debate, yet the French Revolution1 increased tension within Parliament, and a conservative backlash resulted. Therefore Reform was less likely. The possibility of reform increased with the resignation of Liverpool in 1827, the ensuing Tory break-up and formation of a Whig government by Grey in 1830. During Pitt's ministry2, he had managed to form an anti-reform majority both inside and outside Westminster. It was because of this that those who had served under him3 remained hostile to reform well into the 1820's, aiding the reason as to why Parliamentary Reform wasn't passed before 1832. Some historians have even maintained that there was nothing to suggest that Parliament needed reform. One Historian said, 'There is no objective sense in which these things can be said to have made the electoral system inappropriate.'4 The main threat still remained as to what might happen if Parliament remained dogmatic and inflexible, and therefore, M.P's were still aware of reform being a live issue. ...read more.

Middle

On March 6th, Peel finally introduced a Catholic Emancipation Bill. This proved to many that, as Wellington had gone against his beliefs of Emancipation, what was to say that he wouldn't do the same on the issue of Parliamentary reform? As Horace Twiss said, 'Catholic Emancipation had riven the Conservative body asunder and through the chasm, the Reform Bill forced its way.' The passing of the Bill was a major Constitutional reform, and the dissenting radical M.P. William Smith said Emancipation 'appeared to have transformed a number of the highest Tories in the land to something very nearly resembling radical reformers.15 At this point, Reform appeared to be imminent. Extra Parliamentary agitation increased dramatically during the period of 1829 to 1832.16 Working class leaders favoured full male suffrage and middle class allies still distrusted democracy. Political rallies, demonstrations and pro-reform petitions increased the want for reform. The outbreak of the 'Swing riots'17 showed that the working class were beginning to take the law into their own hands, and therefore parliament felt threatened. Ministers began to think that the only way to stop revolution was to grant a Reform Bill. George IV died in June 1830, and the ensuing general election showed that Reform was important in determining strength of the government; those who dared to declare themselves against reform were beaten. ...read more.

Conclusion

The overthrowing of this most powerful Autocracy in Europe led to a greater emergence of radical groups everywhere. 2 Pitt was Prime Minister from December 1783-1801, and for a second time from 1804 till 1806. 3 Namely Liverpool, Castlereagh and Canning. 4 Doctor Jonathon Clark. 5 Changes made between August 1822 and January 1823. 6 Liverpool suffered a stroke in February 1827, so was forced to resign. 7 Wellington and Peel refused to serve in Cannings ministry. 8 Wellington, Westmoreland and Eldon wanted political relief for Protestants. 9 Huskisson and old Grenville supporters backed Catholic Emancipation. 10 In August 1827, Canning died and Goderich became Prime Minister. 11 Collapsed in autumn 1827. 12 Among those he dismissed was Huskisson. 13 Eric J. Evans: The Great Reform Act of 1832. 14 The rules stated that a Catholic could stand in a by-election, but not serve. 15 J. C. D Clark: English Society1688-1832. 16 Riots broke out due to failed harvest; unemployment rose and the public were in disarray. 17 The riots began in 1830. Workers began to burn hayricks and riots broke out due to a bad harvest. 18 In Bristol, rioters controlled the city for 3 days and in Nottingham, the Duke of Newcastle's castle was set on fire. The days of May began in order to stop the Duke of Wellington becoming Prime Minister, as this would mean that reform would be even less likely. People were encouraged to run to banks and demand gold. Alexandra Corbet-Milward Rugby School ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    While some threats were very serious, other were not as serious. They could still be classed as serious but the government intervention stopped them getting serious. The Pentrich Revolution, was an attempted revolution stirred up by an agent provocateur especially W.J Richards who informed a group of workers that they

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    One of the other two major inputs why the reform act became necessary was the severe economic problems which had hit Britain. Britain had never really fully recovered from the war and the economy was still suffering from this, along with the crippling factor of industrial revolution.

  1. UNIT 5 PAPER 5A: REPRESENTATION AND DEMOCRACY IN BRITAIN, 1830-1931

    * In Europe, Russia had seen an aborted attempt at revolution in 1905. * Upper/middle class men fought alongside working class in the trenches; by 1918 accepted that there should be universal male suffrage. * TUs also showed a responsible attitude at home; pre-war militancy died down during the war.

  2. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Evans (1995, pp 93-4) points out that neither Grey's ministry nor the Whig party were united on reform. Lack of information about different types of constituency and the extent of middle-class and landed influence, moreover, made it impossible to accomplish the reorganisation posited by Moore.

  1. To what extent was the 1832 Great Reform Act introduced due to fear of ...

    There are those, however, who believe that the threat of revolution present between 1831-32 was completely exaggerated. American historian Joseph Hamburger argues that radicals such as Francis Place and Thomas Attwood created a 'phoney' atmosphere of revolution at this time in order to prevent Wellington from forming a government and to exhort MPs to pass the Reform Bill quickly.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    An attempt to intimidate the Government? * Suffragettes believed themselves to be continuing a long and venerable tradition of protest as previous extensions of the franchise, for instance in 1832 and 1867 had been preceded by great disturbances. The WSPU drew on historical examples of the unlawful exercise of physical force to justify its tactics and identified the suffragettes with past revolutionary and resistance heroes.

  1. How great was the Great Reform Act?

    the industrial north, as all the country towns were still relatively bigger than industrial towns, of which some didn?t gain parliamentary seats. Also another reason which takes away the ?greatness? from the act was that about 70 borough pocket boroughs? remained, and this was controlled by the rich landowners.

  2. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    This was a symbol of a typical liberal country- that men were cohabiting with the police and that people were being monitored not by the extreme high powers, or by an unfair tyranny, but by other ordinary men. There are however, some arguments put forward by several modern historians stating that the Tories were not as liberal as first envisaged.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work