• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the passage of the 1832 Reform Act so contested when it's importance was so small?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the passage of the 1832 Reform Act so contested when it's importance was so small? During the early part of the 19th Century reform was placed low on the political agenda. This was perhaps due to the Napoleonic Wars with France which showed people the damaging effects war could have on the country. However, in 1819 the arguments concerning the reformation of parliament came back into the public's conscious. The growing role of the media acted as a new method of informing the public of their rights and the need for action. People were also being made aware through public meetings held by radical MP's that favoured reform. It is therefore not hard to see why in 1832 the Great Reform Act was passed. 'Old Corruption' was the name given to the voting system prior to the reform because bribery and corruption were the principle means through which candidates secured votes. ...read more.


The election process was not conducted on a single day but held over a number of weeks. The result might not be know for 2 months. There was no voting in secrecy. Voting took place on a platform amid an atmosphere of drunkenness and sometimes violent intimidation. Corruption was rife in terms of treating, cooping and the hiring of lambs. It is therefore reasonable that people called for reform in 1832. The 1832 Reform Act was seen at the time to be a solution to an ongoing problem highlighted by popular unrest. It attempted to correct the failings of 'Old Corruption' whilst ensuring the elites in society retained their grip on power. The Act consisted of two essential elements, the redistribution of seats and the remodelling and systemising of the franchise. The Act released 143 seats that were redistributed accordingly - 62 seats to English counties, 22 new two-member boroughs, 19 new single member boroughs, 8 new seats in Scotland, 5 new seats in Wales and 5 new seats in Ireland. ...read more.


In the short term, the 1832 Reform Act did not institute a dangerously democratic political structure. The number of voters doubled and approximately 717,000 people could vote. Those 717,000 consisted of 18% of the male population of England which meant that there was a 6% increase. It brought some of the upper middle class into order but till all interests and classes were not represented in Parliament. More people had the right to vote but they came from a more limited sector of society. With so many people till excluded from franchise, there began a realisation that the points of view of the people were not being recognised. So why was such a fuss made about this Act if it didn't change an awful lot? The Reform Act of 1832 had been the initial break with tradition. Before this event nobody had realistically contested the supremacy of the Upper Classes or tried to bridge gaps in the order of society. From now on it would be difficult to resist the demands for change and the extension of the vote to a greater number of people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative ...

    as Burgage and Potwalloper boroughs were done away with and replaced with a uniform �10 qualification to anyone in a Borough. This, at the time was no small feat. Only perhaps the newly formed United States of America could boast voting rights such as these and that country was formed exactly on what the Whigs didn't want.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    From 1811 to 1813 and again in 1816 there were a number of violent incidents occurring in textile areas around the country. The attacks were caused because of general unrest combined with the opposing of the new machinery supposedly threatening their jobs.

  1. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    act compromises which saved full scale revolt however another historian J.Hamburger believe that the violent incidents weren't as serious as some people think and the danger was exaggerated by radicals to panic the government into passing the reform bill. Hamburger uses evidence to back up his theory and a main

  2. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    In 1938 E. L. Woodward noted that, 'neither side found the result as dramatic as it had expected'. A monument to Earl Grey at the head of Grey Street in Newcastle-Upon Tyne, has the inscription, '...the great measure of parliamentary reform was, after an arduous and protracted struggle, safely and triumphantly achieved in the year 1832'.

  1. Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative ...

    The violence alienated the middle class and respectable support. Also from my own knowledge after the violence of the Newport rising and the Plug Riots the middle class did seem to go much further against the cause of Chartism with over 10,000 volunteer middle class police men choosing to support the army and police and the meeting on Kennington Common.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    So, first of all the reader can see how unfair it is. The poet also makes her feelings clear by the sheer joy she has in telling the employer that she is leaving and from now on she can do her dirty work herself.

  1. Why was the first Great Reform Act passed in 1832 and not before?

    Daniel O'Connell, an Irish Catholic, won a by-election but could not serve14. Wellington was now in a no-win situation, as if he passed the bill, the fragile unity of the Tory party would be destroyed. However, this was risked and in February 1829, the King said there'd be a 'review of religious disabilities.'

  2. Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the ...

    popular electoral grievances, and surely the potential existed in Britain for the same to happen. The whole issue of reform was heightened by events in France in July 1830. Charles X had ruled in a heavy handed manner and had refused to recognise the results of sweeping election gains for the Liberal opposition in 1829.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work