• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the passage of the 1832 Reform Act so contested when it's importance was so small?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the passage of the 1832 Reform Act so contested when it's importance was so small? During the early part of the 19th Century reform was placed low on the political agenda. This was perhaps due to the Napoleonic Wars with France which showed people the damaging effects war could have on the country. However, in 1819 the arguments concerning the reformation of parliament came back into the public's conscious. The growing role of the media acted as a new method of informing the public of their rights and the need for action. People were also being made aware through public meetings held by radical MP's that favoured reform. It is therefore not hard to see why in 1832 the Great Reform Act was passed. 'Old Corruption' was the name given to the voting system prior to the reform because bribery and corruption were the principle means through which candidates secured votes. ...read more.


The election process was not conducted on a single day but held over a number of weeks. The result might not be know for 2 months. There was no voting in secrecy. Voting took place on a platform amid an atmosphere of drunkenness and sometimes violent intimidation. Corruption was rife in terms of treating, cooping and the hiring of lambs. It is therefore reasonable that people called for reform in 1832. The 1832 Reform Act was seen at the time to be a solution to an ongoing problem highlighted by popular unrest. It attempted to correct the failings of 'Old Corruption' whilst ensuring the elites in society retained their grip on power. The Act consisted of two essential elements, the redistribution of seats and the remodelling and systemising of the franchise. The Act released 143 seats that were redistributed accordingly - 62 seats to English counties, 22 new two-member boroughs, 19 new single member boroughs, 8 new seats in Scotland, 5 new seats in Wales and 5 new seats in Ireland. ...read more.


In the short term, the 1832 Reform Act did not institute a dangerously democratic political structure. The number of voters doubled and approximately 717,000 people could vote. Those 717,000 consisted of 18% of the male population of England which meant that there was a 6% increase. It brought some of the upper middle class into order but till all interests and classes were not represented in Parliament. More people had the right to vote but they came from a more limited sector of society. With so many people till excluded from franchise, there began a realisation that the points of view of the people were not being recognised. So why was such a fuss made about this Act if it didn't change an awful lot? The Reform Act of 1832 had been the initial break with tradition. Before this event nobody had realistically contested the supremacy of the Upper Classes or tried to bridge gaps in the order of society. From now on it would be difficult to resist the demands for change and the extension of the vote to a greater number of people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative ...

    secret ballot, in my opinion very much one of the most corrupt features of the electoral system of the time. In many boroughs the Landlord could still control the election by threatening the electorate with the chance of having no residence.

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    in rotten boroughs, these were much lower in power now that the large towns had increased electorates and so Whigs now had a much larger majority. It was realised that the bill needed revising substantially, once this was done, along with majorities in Oct 1831 the house was able to pass a reform bill.

  1. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    pressure to spur on reform as much as the events in November 1831. The Bristol riots occurred after the House of Lords rejected the second reform bill, the riots lasted for at least three days and houses were looted and destroyed; four men were also hanged for leading the riot.

  2. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    and Phillips (1982) have examined the importance of 1832 in promoting new forms of political organisation, registration drives, party cohesion, the rise of urban and industrial influence, and a higher number of electoral contests (with persistent partisan voting). The instrumentality of reform is clear.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    Other candidates would use threats. Considering that most candidates were wealthy landowners they might warn tenants that they could be evicted if they did not vote for him or for his candidate. Sometimes people such as shopkeepers, trades people, solicitors and doctors were threatened with an organised boycott of their

  2. Do you agree with the contemporary view that the Reform Act of 1832 was ...

    Many members of the middle class hoped that Parliamentary reform would in some way prevent these actions from becoming revolutionary, something that would be as much against their interests as it would be against the aristocracy's. Perhaps it is first useful to note the historian Bentleys' comments that despite Whig

  1. Do you agree with the view that the 1832 reform act was a conservative ...

    Thomas Cooper clearly believed, being a leading member of the movement, that any violence would undermine the cause. However from this source we can clearly identify a key weakness of the Chartist movement. Thomas Cooper says that the violence that day was at Longton, Lancashire.

  2. Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the ...

    In 1823 Daniel O'Connell and Richard Shiel formed the Catholic Association of Ireland. There main aim was to achieve emancipation. It had membership by charging the Catholic rent; it grew quickly in popularity and also in resources. It was closed down in 1825, but then an alternative, the Order of Liberation continued to raise money for the cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work