• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the Act?

Extracts from this document...


James Cox Tuesday, 26 November 2002 Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the Act? The Whigs defeated the Tories in the 1830 elections, under Lord Grey, and were asked to form a government. At this time, there were numerous rotten boroughs and pocket boroughs, in which people (the working class) lived in terribly unhealthy and very bad conditions. There was disease, over-crowding and a lot of dirt and mess on the streets and in people's houses. They were parliamentary constituencies with a small population, and were often effectively owned by a single powerful landowner. In these boroughs, there were no voters. In the 1830's, only a small number of people voted, and there was no uniform franchise. In some constituencies, voters had to own a freehold worth 40 shillings a year and seats were not distributed according to population, so it was very unrepresentative. There was a growth in the population at this time and an emergence of industry, these only increased the inequality in seat distribution. Growing cities such as Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham weren't represented at all in Parliament. Many people said that the political system only represented a few, and those few used it to improve their own lives but not the lives of others. ...read more.


They smashed machinery, set fire to hay bails and caused general mayhem. The pressure for reform from the population was great, and when the Tories were in power, there was not much chance of reform because they were very much against it. But, the Whigs under Lord Grey were not against reform. The Whig government was very committed to parliamentary reform, and had recognised that the old unreformed electoral system was defective. Lord Grey argued that the electoral system should reflect the economic contribution now made by the middle and upper classes. He wanted to strengthen the government by allying it with the middle classes. The proposals of the Whigs were primarily aimed at increasing representation of the middle classes in the new industrial cities. Grey was very aware of the threat of revolution, so he believed reform would stop any possibility of this. As the Whigs were not against reform, and there was so much pressure for it, the Whigs introduced the Reform Bill in 1831, written by John Russell, and it was surprisingly radical. It proposed the following: * A lowering of the property qualification in order to extend the vote to about 300,000 new voters or about 18% of the adult male population. ...read more.


Conditions of the towns were still very bad, and new following reforms were not going to help the poor e.g. the Poor Law Amendment Act. The Act severely restricted the power the Crown had in influencing events at Westminster. Now, a ministry could now survive without the support of the Crowns and Lords but not without the support of the Commons. Perhaps the most important consequence of the 1832 Reform Act was that it prepared the way for further political, social and economic change. It wetted the appetite for new reforms such as the Municipal Corporations Act, the Marriage Act and the Factory Act. The Reform Act in 1832 came about because of huge amounts of pressure from the working class (swing riots, and National Union of Working Class), the middle classes (BPU), and the Radicals (Henry Hunt). They all wanted to stop corruption, and gain representation and the Whigs realised reform was necessary. However, although they passed the act in the end after objections from Tories, the act had a negative effect on the working class, and the middle classes only benefited slightly. It seemed like the Whigs were the ones who benefited most from the Act. However, it was a huge landmark, and the act did definitely set the scene for future reforms and gave the Whigs a taste for it. It was also the beginnings of a modern party organisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the 1832 reform act the result of popular pressure

    such as the economy, industrialisation, social change and new ideas must also be considered, as without these factors, popular pressure may not have been as great. The revival of reform was partly in response to the state of the economy.

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    I feel the other big reason/catalyst was the catholic emancipation act as this resulted in the split and weakening of the Tories. It meant that Catholics could now sit in parliament.

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Indeed, reform made previous changes irreversible. Yet Phillips probably claims too much. His focus on local conditions is not easy to marry with his view that the Reform Act facilitated the rise of national parties and national issues. Furthermore, reform gave government broader responsibilities, another reason why purely local contexts were superseded.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    In the 18th Century, only 558 MPs were elected to the House of Commons. In most cases, two MP's represented each constituency. These constituencies or voting districts were divided into two groups: counties and boroughs. Most MPs were generally wealthy because not only did they have to have an annual income of �600 (�300 for borough MPs)

  1. Free essay

    how far did the 1832 Reform Act rectify the defects of the original political ...

    This loophole also allowed people to be easily bribed into voting for a specific person so the voting system as a whole was not exactly representative of the opinions that the voters had.

  2. How successful was the Reform Act in rectifying defects in the political system?

    There were many motivations for a new Reform Act to be passed. As the population was increasing there was an ever growing need for modification to the standing system. The industrial revolution accentuated the irregular geographic distribution of the population and therefore disturbed the regular distribution of county and borough representation.

  1. To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called Great?

    Therefore the landowner would bribe the voters into getting them to vote for him by using money. By abolishing these anomalies over 250,000 more people were allowed to vote for who they wanted. Due to this, the very rich middle class were allowed to vote, and bought greater content towards

  2. What was the impact of the Poor Law Amendment Act on the relief of ...

    Tom Paine, a writer and republican, criticised the Poor Law saying it was inadequate because the wealthy did not contribute enough. Robert Owen was a radical factory owner who blamed the capitalist economic system for creating poverty. He proposed that if workers were employed in cooperative communities everyone would share the profits.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work