• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905? An event as complex and ideologically significant as the 1905 revolution is difficult to attribute to any single causal factors. Indeed it is vital to contextualise the historians of this revolution as much as the event itself. Marxist historians see the 1905 revolution as part of a broader pattern of ideological awakening leading inevitably to 1917. Historians with a western capitalist bias writing in the aftermath of the revolution tend to emphasize the manipulative, charismatic attributes of this revolution from above. Both views are more dogmatic than evaluative; however by combing both positions we move closer to an accurate analysis of 1905. One where the revolutionary intelligentsia skilfully manipulated the popular discontent resuting from huge social and demographic change and where the Tsarist reactionary and conservative policies were wholly inadequate to manage this change or the growing discontent, (para one doesn't flow from this point) This is exemplified by the 'Bloody Sunday' massacre on the 22nd of January 1905. As well as a 'tipping point' the massacre should be viewed as a metaphor for the inability of Nicholas' regime to deal with the genuine grievance of the Russian people, whilst demonstrating the opportunism of the intelligentsia in exploiting this. A group of peaceful petitioners and their families were marching to the St. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas emphasised Russia status as a "great power" and focused upon industrialisation without making the societal changes that would allow the distribution of its profits within Russia. It was a misguided attempt at applying 20th century fiscal policy, to a feudal governmental structure. The seriousness of this issue in causing the revolution can be seen in that the Zemstvo nobility, as well as professionals from the upper and middle classes began to rally behind the illegal liberal movement, defying the okhrana and show a significant difference in the social unrest seen by any previous Tsar. Clearly this best explains why there was a revolution in 1905, and why there was opposition not just from the workers but from a range of individuals desperate enough to find the ideological leaders more promising for personal prosperity than the Tsar. Yet again in 1904 Nicholas clung so vehemently to the traditional autocratic values of Tsardom, within a context where such ideas were not only impractical but destructive to the very structures he sought to protect. Nowhere is this mistake more clearly demonstrated than the Russo-Japanese war. Russia's expansionist desires in the east, combined with a military desire for an ice-free port led to the provoking of Japan, who also wanted ownership of Korean Port Arthur (but were willing to negotiate), into mounting an attack, and starting off the Russo-Japanese war. ...read more.

Conclusion

However even with Nicholas's behaviour this seems unlikely as industrialisation and the emancipation of the surfs changed the structure of Russian society without changing the way it was governed which is clearly very important in answering why there was a revolution in Russia in 1905, and more significant than the Russo-Japanese war which in a different societal structure may have received the kind of patriotic support Nicholas was hoping to achieve. Clearly the role of the intelligentsia in exploiting this popular resentment is one of the best historical explanations for the 1905 revolution. Overall it seems in answering the question why was there a revolution in 1905, whilst the short term causes are important, the long term causes that created social unrest are the most significant and relevant for answering the question. Without the build up of effects from long term causes, short term reasons wouldn't have been so significant for example the police wouldn't have overreacted so much on Bloody Sunday if it weren't for the heightened atmosphere of revolution that came from the spread of liberalist or otherwise ideology. The reason there was a revolution in Russia in 1905 was the level of social unhappiness and resentment that came from years of autocratic rule, and terrible living conditions for a large sector of the population, combined with the skills of the intelligentsia to draw upon resentment and expose the reactionary nature of autocracy, which gave Nicholas' enemies a platform on which to plan revolution. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. was bloody sunday the prime reason for the 1905 revolution

    The mutiny did however pose a threat to the tsarist government as during a crisis such as this the government would need the loyalty of its soldiers and without this the government would easily collapse. Yet still the importance of the mutiny could possibly stem from the fact that the

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    This was a powerful incentive to reach targets! * There was a great increase in technical education in this period. There was an insatiable appetite for skilled, literate workers and managers. * Peasants from the countryside often found themselves operating quite sophisticated machinery with little or no tuition, and few instructions.

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    I partially agree with this statement, but this is not the whole story and there are other factors that led to Stalin winning the power struggle. Stalin's ideas were practical and could be put into practise and work out more successfully than Trotsky's.

  2. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    However, the Tsar was unwilling to give them this and instead wanted them to relocate to urban areas in order to lead the industrialisation of Russia. The pressure on land use also resulted in less land feeding increasing numbers of families, and the ignorance of the Tsar to this problem led to violent unrest and resentment towards the Tsar.

  1. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II saved by making concessions in the 1905 ...

    The Manifesto appeared as though the Tsar had recognised the grievances of the Russians and wanted to help by offering reform and a government who would make decisions with the people in mind. Following the victory of the October Manifesto, there was a critical split within the revolutionary opposition between the liberals and the democrats.

  2. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution fail to ...

    They had no trade unions for protection. Their homes were crowded and poorly built. Economic recession between 1899 and 1903 had also led to growing unemployment throughout the Empire. A short-term military cause of the 1905 Revolution was the defeat of Russian in the war against Japan in 1904.

  1. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    Lydia Dan believed ?Russia was the brink of something?. Russian population was growing rapidly from 98 million in 1885 to 125 million by 1905. This resulted in the individual peasant land holdings falling in size; with further famines to follow by 1905 the countryside seemed on the verge of revolution.

  2. Assess the reasons for the 1905 revolution in Russia.

    This created mass unemployment, which made would-be workers very angry because they could not get money to fund their own houses or food. Many workers were struck by poverty due to the recession and unemployment. The lack of the minimum wage, which was not introduced to Russia until later in the 20th century, was another reason for the revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work