• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905? An event as complex and ideologically significant as the 1905 revolution is difficult to attribute to any single causal factors. Indeed it is vital to contextualise the historians of this revolution as much as the event itself. Marxist historians see the 1905 revolution as part of a broader pattern of ideological awakening leading inevitably to 1917. Historians with a western capitalist bias writing in the aftermath of the revolution tend to emphasize the manipulative, charismatic attributes of this revolution from above. Both views are more dogmatic than evaluative; however by combing both positions we move closer to an accurate analysis of 1905. One where the revolutionary intelligentsia skilfully manipulated the popular discontent resuting from huge social and demographic change and where the Tsarist reactionary and conservative policies were wholly inadequate to manage this change or the growing discontent, (para one doesn't flow from this point) This is exemplified by the 'Bloody Sunday' massacre on the 22nd of January 1905. As well as a 'tipping point' the massacre should be viewed as a metaphor for the inability of Nicholas' regime to deal with the genuine grievance of the Russian people, whilst demonstrating the opportunism of the intelligentsia in exploiting this. A group of peaceful petitioners and their families were marching to the St. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas emphasised Russia status as a "great power" and focused upon industrialisation without making the societal changes that would allow the distribution of its profits within Russia. It was a misguided attempt at applying 20th century fiscal policy, to a feudal governmental structure. The seriousness of this issue in causing the revolution can be seen in that the Zemstvo nobility, as well as professionals from the upper and middle classes began to rally behind the illegal liberal movement, defying the okhrana and show a significant difference in the social unrest seen by any previous Tsar. Clearly this best explains why there was a revolution in 1905, and why there was opposition not just from the workers but from a range of individuals desperate enough to find the ideological leaders more promising for personal prosperity than the Tsar. Yet again in 1904 Nicholas clung so vehemently to the traditional autocratic values of Tsardom, within a context where such ideas were not only impractical but destructive to the very structures he sought to protect. Nowhere is this mistake more clearly demonstrated than the Russo-Japanese war. Russia's expansionist desires in the east, combined with a military desire for an ice-free port led to the provoking of Japan, who also wanted ownership of Korean Port Arthur (but were willing to negotiate), into mounting an attack, and starting off the Russo-Japanese war. ...read more.

Conclusion

However even with Nicholas's behaviour this seems unlikely as industrialisation and the emancipation of the surfs changed the structure of Russian society without changing the way it was governed which is clearly very important in answering why there was a revolution in Russia in 1905, and more significant than the Russo-Japanese war which in a different societal structure may have received the kind of patriotic support Nicholas was hoping to achieve. Clearly the role of the intelligentsia in exploiting this popular resentment is one of the best historical explanations for the 1905 revolution. Overall it seems in answering the question why was there a revolution in 1905, whilst the short term causes are important, the long term causes that created social unrest are the most significant and relevant for answering the question. Without the build up of effects from long term causes, short term reasons wouldn't have been so significant for example the police wouldn't have overreacted so much on Bloody Sunday if it weren't for the heightened atmosphere of revolution that came from the spread of liberalist or otherwise ideology. The reason there was a revolution in Russia in 1905 was the level of social unhappiness and resentment that came from years of autocratic rule, and terrible living conditions for a large sector of the population, combined with the skills of the intelligentsia to draw upon resentment and expose the reactionary nature of autocracy, which gave Nicholas' enemies a platform on which to plan revolution. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    By 1938 it was producing 5,000 tons of steel a day. There were many other examples like this. * The fact that Russia was able to resist German invasion in 1941 - just - and then go on and capture Berlin is ample evidence of the success of the Five Year Plans.

  2. FRench revolution

    joined counter-revolutionary forces and escape France but soon after were bought back to Paris and were accused of deceiving them. In October 1791 saw the Girondins becoming the strongest party in the Legislative Assembly of the French nation. The French revolution began in 1789 but by the spring of 1792 three-years-later France did maintain both war and revolution simultaneously.

  1. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II saved by making concessions in the 1905 ...

    The Tsar could not work with the people in the 1st or 2nd Duma because there were too many people who opposed him with hostile demands, with the Duma mostly dominated by the Left who didn't want to work with the Tsar.

  2. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    Many of them were highly unpopular for their authoritarian natures and the unfairness of the system which they operated, taxing the Third Estate heavily and reaping all the profits. The King had an important opportunity to redeem his government's falling reputation in 1789, when he made the decision to call the Estates-General to attempt to reform the finance system.

  1. Why was the Tsar able to survive Revolution in 1905 with his powers intact?

    Lastly, Nicholas took back his concessions in 1906 with the publishing of the Fundamental Laws. This clearly showed how limited the Duma's power would be, and how the Tsar's power would remain unharmed, perhaps even stronger, and how no law could be passed without the Tsar's approval.

  2. How well equipped was Tsar Nicholas II to deal with the problems that faced ...

    Nicholas II was also faced with the problem of the need to increase industrial production. Due to reforms by Alexander III industry had been improved, however despite this production was not as high as in European countries with whom Russia would have liked to compete.

  1. Free essay

    What Were the Causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution Fail to ...

    with by being sent to prison or exile and it resulted in the people of Russia having next to no human rights. They lost the power of free speech, free will and even the right to choose who to marry.

  2. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    The government was far too slow to export the necessary supplies and the transport system failed to cope. The government was also reluctant to send out food until they had ?statistical proof? that the province had no other means of food; but by then it was often too late.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work