Why was there a stalemate on the Western Front for three years?

Authors Avatar

Stalemate

Why was there a stalemate on the Western Front for three years? The basic problem was that army commanders in every country had not done their homework. It was assumed that the war would be over quickly, like the Franco-Prussian war in 1870, but the machine guns and barbed wire made quick advances increasingly difficult. They also made the use of cavalry – which most armies believed would be the decisive weapon almost impossible. The two British Commanders – in chief, Sir John French and Douglas Haig, were both cavalry officers and kept large cavalry forces in reserve behind the front line waiting for the big breakthrough that never came.

Join now!

The main tactic used by both sides from 1914 to 1918 was frontal assault. First, an artillery barrage was used to flatten the enemy’s defences. This was almost always disastrous. The barrage usually failed to destroy enemy positions and the attackers found themselves advancing into a hail of machine gun fire. The British Army made soldiers advance in order at a steady pace, creating an even better target for the enemy. Around Ypres (Wipers as the British called it), in an area called Flanders, heavy bombardments smashed the drainage systems, and thousands of wounded soldiers disappeared into the mud.

During ...

This is a preview of the whole essay