• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there widespread agreement among the propertied classes by 1832 that urgent action was needed to reform the poor laws?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there widespread agreement among the propertied classes by 1832 that urgent action was needed to reform the poor laws? In 1832, the Whig Government decided to establish a Royal Commission to inquire into the working of the Poor Laws. By 1832, the old poor laws had come under increased criticism from commentators and ratepayers who were basically the propertied classes. There was widespread agreement among the propertied classes that urgent action was needed to fundamentally reform the poor laws. This was as a result of a mixture of long term and more immediate problems, such as the ever-increasing cost of poor relief, the ineffectiveness and corruption of certain poor law administrators, and also other political and social factors such as the effect of the revolution which had recently occurred in France. When the Napoleonic wars ended in 1815, approximately 250,000 servicemen returned to Britain, which consequently led to a saturation of the labour market and led to an increase in unemployment. As a result of this the cost of poor relief continued to increase. ...read more.


Indeed it seems that the ratepayers were correct in complaining of this so-called corruption, as in 1817 the select committee of the House of Commons echoed the concerns of the ratepayers. Subsequently, an Act of Parliament in 1819 allowed parishes to set up Select Vestries. These were small committees, which could specialise in poor law administration and employ salaried assistant overseers to support it. Therefore, the problem seemed to have been resolved. However, the Select Vestries actually produced their own forms of corruption. For example, in 1832, 11 out of 20 members of the Morpeth Select Vestry had a vested interest in the sale of beer. It was widely believed that generous relief payments ended up being spent in the local alehouse or pub. This failure to eradicate the corruption of local poor law administrators is very important in explaining why reform of the poor laws was so popular by 1832. The ratepayers were clearly becoming increasingly fed up and angry with the failure to sort the problem out and hence it is likely that this will have almost certainly led to them demanding for more fundamental reform. ...read more.


The fact that poor relief expenditure had increased during peacetime is undoubtedly very important in explaining why the poor laws had attracted so much criticism. However, the fact that expenditure was at its highest in 1831 is clearly a very important long term factor and the most important factor in explaining why there was widespread agreement among the propertied classes by 1832. Also, the census of 1821 showing a population increase justified Malthus' fears that the Speenhamland system was having a bad affect on the general attitude of the poor is also important in explaining why there was widespread agreement. The poor harvests in the 1820s is an important short-term factors as they effectively caused the rise in the cost of the poor relief. The failure to find an effective solution to the corruption of local poor law administrators clearly angered ratepayers and is very likely to have opened the ratepayers eyes, and led to them insisting that clearly more radical reform was necessary if the poor laws were to be more effective. ?? ?? ?? ?? Dominic Court 07/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Mitchell's interpretation of reform (1993) underlines this point. For Mitchell the reform bill was part of the old Whig struggle against the Crown. Senior Whigs believed that liberty and property were inseparable and that more influence for the propertied classes would serve as a barrier against royal tyranny.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    In the long run people like William Cobbett in exciting the passions of the people towards reform, did harm to the cause of parliamentary reform in 1832. Thomas Paine (1737-1809) was influential in the American and French Revolution. He was not scared to hide his political views and produced a

  1. How did the elderly fare in welfare terms under the English New Poor Law?

    "Until the 1980's little had been written by historians about either the social impact of aging or the changing experience of older people in modern Britain.

  2. "A system in crying need of urgent and substantial reform" Discuss with relation to ...

    The idea of unfair representation and lack of appreciation of the entire country angered many who felt undesired. As a result they therefore wanted change so their opinions could be represented in parliament. In addition, because the representation in parliament was not modernised to match the rapid urbanisation of Britain there was an imbalance in constituencies across Britain.

  1. Why was there a reform act in 1832? What were the consequences of the ...

    However, it was seen that the wider population of England didn't like the idea. In the 1807 election, the Whigs were heckled with cries of 'no popery'. However, in Ireland, the majority being Catholic, Catholic Emancipation was very much an issue.

  2. Do you agree with the contemporary view that the Reform Act of 1832 was ...

    Many believed that despite this, Parliament was still too dominated by the landed interest, which used its power to defend its own interests, as it was perceived it was doing with the Corn Laws of 1815. They believed the taxation burden was being unfairly imposed on the manufacturing sector, with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work