• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the anti Vietnam movements so popular?

Extracts from this document...


Why were the anti Vietnam movements so popular? Vietnam was in the 1950's a colony of France. Conflict between the two nations was always high. The first link between the United States and Vietnam can be found in this decade when President Harry Truman partly funded France in the conflict. A relationship extended by Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy is it therefore possible to say that the United States was tied political, economic, and militarily to Vietnam. Members of the American senate were vocal in their condemnation of their countries involvement in Vietnam during the summer of 1964. This inspired the mass antiwar movement that appeared in the following year. The anti war movement was to be of a scale never before seen within the US. Teach-ins are mass public demonstrations organized and based around universities. The first teach-in against the Vietnamese war was held on March 24 1965 at the University of Michigan, this first display of opposition was mirrored in numerous other campuses around the US. The fact that these protests spread to so many middle class elitist universities captured much public and press attention. The teach-ins were reliant upon students being able to mobilize, this was only possible during term times and so the teach-ins were only partially effective. ...read more.


The arguments put forward for the War were highly questionable, the levels of exposure achieved by the anti war movements allowed them to expose these weaknesses. It is possible to say that the protesters in oppose to the government were able to be so successful because they had the stronger argument. Opposition was also strengthened by the fact that this war seemingly without any valid cause was draining the US economy in 1968 13 percent of all government spending was on Vietnam. This denied funds to Americas other needs such as hospitals, education and health. Black leader Martin Luther King challenged the American spending, saying that "they were neglecting the more pressing social issues, such as racism, social security and many other internal affairs"5 that were bothering America at the time. This did not help win support for the war. There was a growing social trend towards extreme liberalism. The hippy movement embodied this shift. They were very passionate about many issues, peace was central to their ideology. This movement came to its strongest in the summer of 1967 during the period known as "the summer of love". 6The war, to the hippies caused great distress. The strength of the Anti war groups was enhanced by the social morality of America's youths at this period. ...read more.


His plan failed not because of its merit but due to the fact that at Kent university on May 4th 1970 four protesters were shot dead. This caused demonstrations on hundreds of college campuses "paralyzing America's higher-education systems."10 "The Kent State tragedy ignited a nationwide campus disaster. Between May 4 and May 8, campuses experienced an average of 100 demonstrations a day, 350 campus strikes, 536 colleges shut down, and 73 colleges reported significant violence in their protests."11 100,000 people gathered in Washington in protest the following weekend. In 1971 60% of Americans opposed the war. Withdrawal now seemed certain, in 1974, the new president, Gerald Ford, wanted to increase military aide to the faltering Saigon regime. Congress refused his requests this was a clear blow for the US president, the majority of the US, Congress and the press were all against the war. Final withdrawal came in 1975. The antiwar movements were able to succeed in stopping the war. Continued American governments acting against the wishes of their people and against what is to me the more valid argument clearly contributed to the war movement's success. Most importantly the political educated, active and agitated America of the late 1960's and 70's acted as a fertile base from which opposition could flourish. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    It set up roadblocks, checkpoints, and observation posts, interdicting approximately ten guerrilla patrols per month heading toward Israel. When UNIFIL apprehended Palestinian guerrillas, it confiscated their weapons but usually returned them later to PLO leaders. UNIFIL paid a price for performing its mission, however; between 1978 and 1982, thirty-six UNIFIL members were killed in action.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    we realise that Guthrie wants us to question the motives behind America's involvement in Vietnam. The line is riddled with a sense of regret. Guthrie believes that the, after the horrific behaviour of the Americans serving in the war, America will have to face the negative aspects of the war.

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    It was a strong and bold antiwar film, which the people had been waiting for, many directors were too afraid to make such a statement. Near the end and after the war, the impact of media was still affecting the public opinion, although now America tried to look on the

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    was practically as large as Western Europe and fought with a determined passion for its independence. The North had to invade and defeat the opposition in order to win; the South had only to defend its borders. The conflict was not so uneven as it seemed.

  1. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    Historically, Carr's argument seems to find sufficient basis in the outbreak of World War I. One of the reasons contributing to the war was the increase in bellicosity, arising from rationalization of cost and benefit or cooperation and non-cooperation. Prior to the Great War, the perceived cost of non-cooperation19 had decreased.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in Contemporary Literature, Film and popular ...

    Columnists who wrote pieces about the war expressed very strong views on the subject as they were very anti-war and wanted their opinions to be known to the reader, obviously resulting in the article being completely biased. The same applies if an editor of a newspaper is also anti-war then

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work