• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the Bolsheviks successful in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Jack Gammon Why were the Bolsheviks successful in 1917? The Bolsheviks succeeded in revolution on 8th July due to numerous factors, one major event "the Kornilov Affair" contributed greatly to kick starting the revolution. This along with the provisional governments downfalls and mistakes added together to make their seizure of power almost inevitable. Alexander Kerensky was the new leader of the Provisional Government, he was still the most popular man in the government because of his political past. In the Duma he had been leader of the moderate socialists and had been seen as the champion of the working class. However, Kerensky, was unwilling to end the war. In fact, soon after taking office, he announced a new summer offensive. Soldiers on the Eastern Front were dismayed at the news and regiments began to refuse to move to the front line. There was a rapid increase in the number of men deserting and by the autumn of 1917 roughly 2 million men had up and left. Some of these soldiers returned to their homes and used their weapons to seize land from the nobility. Manor houses were burnt down and in some cases wealthy landowners were murdered. ...read more.


The Bolsheviks were credited with the defence of the city, and became extremely popular. They soon dominated executive committees of soviets throughout Russia. Lenin had been watching events from Finland. He noted that the Bolsheviks had a strong control of the soviet; they were at a all time popular high, in elections across Russia and in general public opinion. After the Kornilov affair other groups such as the liberals were demoralized and weakened, and the provisional government had been exposed as helpless and weak. Lenin wanted to move into action immediately, to fill what he saw as a power vacuum left by Kerensky mistakes. However Trotsky who had been elected president of the Petrograd soviet suggested that they should wait till the "Second congress of all Russian soviets" as they could appear to seize control with the support of the soviets rather than simply a Bolshevik movement. In the mean time Kerensky was making things worse for himself. He sent away any perceived radical units within the army from the capital, severely weakening its presence. This allowed the soviet which was now under Bolshevik control to set up the military revolutionary Committee in the capital and increase its strength and power. ...read more.


The government also saw itself only in the short term governing of the country, and so therefore could not make the long term decisions about Russia's future the people wanted. The perceived lack of reform and general contempt for the government lead people into the arms of the Bolsheviks and other left wing groups connected with them. Its decisions on war also created large opposition, and refused to give minorities autonomy. In the end although the provisional government's intentions could be seen as for the good of Russia, the factors against it were not stacked in its favour. It is fair to say that in the end the Bolsheviks were the right group in the right place, and simply chose the correct time and acted accordingly for a successful revolution, careful planning was as important as luck in the course of events. They were successful in their goal, but this was mainly due to the government's incompetence and factors such as Kerenskys mistakes. Had the government made a few decisions that pleased the people as a whole it may have held onto power by the skin of its teeth for longer. But then was revolution inevitable anyway? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    It scarcely matters that party reconcil- ation would have been problematic even without Lenin's opposition---He was resented for not even wanting to try, and for making his views known in such a callous manner and at such an inappropriate time.

  2. Did Kerensky hand over power to the Bolsheviks?

    His speech was poor but his ideologies and vigour was enough to steal the show from the lacklustre long winded speech of Kerensky. Kornilov was the right wings choice and Kerensky was liked by neither. He played second fiddle to Kornilov on the right and the left thought he was counter-revolutionary.

  1. General Trotsky contributed to the success of the Bolsheviks by winning the support of ...

    The whites were the Mensheviks. This helped the Bolsheviks stay in control; he quite often used the Red Army and the Cheka as a form of propaganda. The army was a tool that helped them stay in power. He used this tool when the social revolutionaries won the open elections.

  2. Why did 1917 end with Lenin in Power rather than Kerensky?

    It was still tainted with the Tsarist and Provisional Governments 'brush' inexplicable linked to the past. To the revolutionists it was too conservative, it continued to impose the structure of Autocracy that Russia had endured for hundreds of years. As Robert Service says "There was a widely-held assumption that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work