• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the Normans able to extend their control over southern Italy and Sicily so successfully between 1050 and 1100?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Why were the Normans able to extend their control over southern Italy and Sicily so successfully between 1050 and 1100? In the fifty years following 1050, the Normans made great advances in both southern Italy and Sicily. These successes cannot be solely put down to one factor but instead an accumulation. The Normans were well known for their ferocity in battle being direct descendants of Vikings. Their prowess in battle was only elevated by the fact that the peoples of southern Italy were deeply divided contrasting the unity of the Normans. Some may also put the Normans success down to fortuitous chance. Firstly, the Normans success can be put down to their military superiority. Despite the fact that Cavalry were extremely difficult to reorganise after a charge and it is possible that the numbers and the effects of horsemen have been exaggerated, the impact has not and in battle it was truly impressive, the Normans ability to coordinate land and Sea attacks further supplemented their success. The calibre of the Norman troops was also not to be scoffed at, and their services at this time were in high demand, proving their reputation of strength in battle. ...read more.

Middle

It was the co-ordinated blockade by sea and land which brought about the capture of Bari in 1071. The transportation of Horses can be first seen in 1060-1061, near Messina, which was quickly captured after just one reconnaissance raid. On the other hand it is very hard to judge the effect of the Norman?s ships and fleets with limited sources. Numbers have probably also been exaggerated over the centuries. As such it is extremely doubtful that 3000 mounted men sustained the Norman cause at Civitate. It is doubtful whether Roger could even put more than 1000 mounted men with varied equipment on the battle field at one time. However this surely once again shows the Norman superiority, as they still emerged victorious thanks to their use of tactics despite not having great masses of men to spare. Secondly, the Normans were able to extend control thanks to the disunity of opposing forces. The fortuitous death of the Emir of Italy in 1052 left three rival emirs. One of which, Ibn Timnah, actually formed an alliance with Roger and Robert Guiscard against a rival emir in Sicily. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were often Rivals in parallel to the relations between the southern Italians. Of course in this sense the Norman expansion of control over Italy could be put down to luck but opportunities need to be seized, and the long series of Norman victory during these decades in such spans of land cannot be explained by fortuitous chance. Finally, the Normans expansion was greatly helped by their relations with the papacy. The Normans relationship with the pope was mutually beneficial. The pope was the highest representative of God on earth and as such gave his blessings to the Normans. The pope also recognised Robert Guiscard as leader of Sicily whilst it was still under Muslim control. In conclusion the Normans were able to extend their control over southern Italy and Sicily so successfully due to the wide array of options they had when it came to pitched battles. Cavalry as well as land and sea coordinated attacks proved to be very effective in southern Italy. The Norman strength in Battle was further helped by the fact they rarely faced a unified enemy and even when they did, they were still overcame thanks to the power of the cavalry charge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    These castles led as examples and catalysed the construction of hundreds more all over England at major centres. They presented clear physical evidence of Norman military and political supremacy, as well as illustrating their establishment in the country. However, due to the vast productions of castles, William was well aware

  2. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    That National Assistance existed at all, however, was an admission of the failure of National Insurance to solve social problems and provide a basis for the funding of the welfare state, as was shown by the fact that only 9% of NHS funding came from National Insurance in 1949.

  1. Assess the factors that lead to the defeat of Boudica and the Iceni in ...

    idea prior to the battle of the supreme numerical advantage that her forces possessed. It was possibly the case that the leaders of the Celtic army saw such a lead as insurmountable and thought it unnecessary to develop and strong Tautology.

  2. How effectively did the design and decoration of the Parthenon suit its function?

    They wanted viewers to be in awe with its vastness. The new octostye design was a development from the hexastyle norm. On the two widths of the temple the 6 Doric columns would be now 8 and along the flank 13 would be 17.

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    particularly Stalin, the Tsarist system is an obvious influence on the Soviet system. The NKVD 'answered directly to Stalin himself,'7 which gave Stalin a level of personal power directly comparable to the Tsars, the fact that Stalin purged the NKVD just showed how much they were a puppet organisation and

  2. "The Venetian Empire was Essentially a Commercial Enterprise. Like all Good Businesses it Survived ...

    during these years and the fact that Venice managed to retain its trading privileges meant that the country became extremely wealthy. Venice's control of Dalmatia, a major source of timber, as well as their wealth meant that they alone had the resources to build such a fleet that was required for the crusaders.

  1. Why was Luther able to challenge the Catholic Church so successfully in the years ...

    It also links to Frederick?s choice to defend him because his passion earned him the role as a lecturer at Wittenberg University which meant Frederick was more willing to support him. Luther?s personality was important for his success, he was determined to change the system of the Church and this

  2. 'Enlightened and tolerant of religious difference.' How far does this statement accurately describe Sicily ...

    This shows extreme tolerance for different religions, which was mutually beneficial, so much so that certain historians argue that Roger was in fact a closet Muslim. Great resemblances to Byzantine works can be seen in Sicily such as the image Christ Pantocrator which is almost identical in Cefalu Cathedral and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work