• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With particular reference to one of the themes studied in the module critically assess the capacity of that theory to further our understanding of the practices of post cold-war international politics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

With particular reference to one of the themes studied in the module (i.e. Liberalism or realism or Marxism or reflectivism) critically assess the capacity of that theory to further our understanding of the practices of post cold-war international politics. The practices of post cold-war international politics is very complex as there are many commentators and theorists who have campaigned the causes for liberalism, realism, Marxism and reflectivism. With the spread of liberal democracies in the post Cold-War years does this suggest that liberalism is becoming more dominant? However though there are other theories to assess as realism was dominant throughout the post Cold-War years because it provided simple but powerful explanations for war and was constant with the rivalry between the Americans and Soviets. It can be argued that the demise of soviet communism at the beginning of the 1990's certainly boosted the weight of liberal theories in international politics. Former US State Departmental official, Francis Fukuyama has asserted this claim, and believes the fall of Eastern Europe and Gorbachev's changing of 'traditional' Soviet ways of thinking, and eventual discarding of Eastern Europe is an indicator that liberal democracy has no serious ideological competitor. It was 'the end point of mankind's ideological evolution' and the 'final form of human government'. It is an argument that has been strengthened by recent transitions to democracy in Africa, East Asia and Latin America (cited in Burchill et al, 2001, 30). ...read more.

Middle

Equally there will be problems with the concept of free trade and relying on other states and neighbours as there are many examples where nationalities have not got on with there territorial neighbours such as the Balkan's and Kurd's. It should also be noted that there have been many more conflicts during the post Cold-War period indicating that the liberalist argument could well be undermined. There have been conflicts in the Persian Gulf, the Balkans and demonstrates the volatility between nations and that war is still prominent. On the other hand, we must realise that in fact none of these countries are democracies, but nonetheless this is still a little disconcerting in maintaining peace in the world order. Similarly the notion of free trade has been criticised by Marxists as free trade would be of benefit to the capitalist economies and free trade in the 1930's especially for Britain benefited the aristocrats and the landed interests. They argue that America wanted to take up the role that Britain once had and wanted to do this by opening the regions of the world. Marxists have the right to condemn this approach as free trade has never been embraced as enthusiastically in developing societies as it has by the elites in wealthy industrial states. They tend to see free trade as a weapon used by dominate players to open up societies to resource exploitation, foreign investment, access to raw materials and the repatriation of profits (cited in Burchill, 2001, 54). ...read more.

Conclusion

This is certainly apparent in many areas of the world as you could put the UK and the USA very easily in the first bracket whilst as Kaplan said countries such as Africa are evidence of being in the latter. Liberalists may try and dispute this point and claim that countries such as Africa are only anarchical because they are not liberal democracies and if they were then this would not be the case as they would engage in free trade and the Hobbesian life alluded to above would not be evident as they would have a materialistic motive to trade and maintain peace. It obvious that liberalism is extremely apparent in the post Cold-War years and equally had a momentous effect. The fact so many countries have the made the transition to a liberal democracy surely strengthens Fukuyama's claims that liberalism is the dominant ideology in the post Cold-War years. This view is reinforced by President George Bush who talked of using the United Nations to maintain peace and try and prevent conflict between countries and the many countries now ruled by civilians and not militaries. Significantly too, the growth of globalisation has undermined the nation-state and meant that the creation of creating a market society is in sight. Globalisation has meant that now there are very few obstacles to international trade and the decline of national economic sovereignty shows that the influence of the state is briskly deteriorating. It is therefore easy to see what liberalism has achieved in the post Cold-War years and what is still trying to attain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * In 1959 Fidel Castro seized power in Cuba. Until then Cuba had been under US influence and many companies had invested heavily in the country. When Castro nationalised all businesses (which meant taking over US firms as well), the USA cut off all aid to Cuba. * In 1960 the Soviet Union signed an agreement to buy 1,000,000 tonnes of Cuban sugar every year.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Thus, all of the United States' political actions further contributed to the Cold War cause. The political actions Of the United States from the time of W.W.II onward caused the Cold War conflict. The conferences of W.W.II set the tone for a time period of distrust between the Soviet union and the United States.

  1. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    the Communist Party working in the State Department (he later changed this number to 57). 8 After this speech, McCarthy gained widespread support, unsurprisingly from right-wing anti-communist groups such as the American Legion and Christian fundamentalists 9 and with the backing of conservative Republicans, who wielded the expedient issue of Communist infiltration to gain Congress in 1950.

  2. How did the Cold War shape post-war politics during the period 1945-1961?

    They were strong in size of military forces, military technology, land, people, political system and source of wealth. In the end, the USSR proved to be weaker in economic power and political stability, they also dominated neighbouring countries on their quest for domination.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    After at least tacitly accepting Russia's right to a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, the West seemed suddenly to change positions and insist on Western-style democracies and economies. As the historian Robert Daliek has shown, Roosevelt and Churchill gave every indication at Tehran and Yalta that they acknowledged the Soviet's need to have friendly governments in Eastern Europe.

  2. What were the Main Causes of the Cold War? and Which of these Causes ...

    Therefore this can be seen as the true beginning of the Cold War. In 1945, the Japanese surrendered to the Russians and those in South Korea to the Americans. It was communist in he North and Capitalists in the South.

  1. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    The development of international politics is related to the understanding of the interconnected awareness in the world we live in today. It is a field covering wide range of issues from recent climate change to nuclear proliferation. It is within the academic subject of International Relations and often described as

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    Marking a border between the two different spheres of influence * The insecurity of the second half of the 1940?s had been caused by both sides attempting to mark out their areas of dominance. * By 1949, the division of Europe had become entrenched, the US military commitment to NATO

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work