• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain should not have won the first world war' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Katherine Dickinson 'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain should not have won the first world war' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view. When war broke out in 1914, most people in Britain expected that it would be over in a matter of months. Accordingly to the slogan of the government, it was 'business as usual'. Only gradually did the full horror begin when to dawn, and with, the mobilization of the nation to win the war at all costs. One of these was to allow women to replace mens' places at work. This was not very popular with the men, but with the women it was. Source A, a letter written in 1976 by a woman who lived and worked through the First World War, explains why. In the source she writes how there was a pay increase from �2 a month to �5 a week. This was obviously popular with the women as they can now afford to buy the essentials that themselves and their family needed. She also tells of how her working hours were cut from 6am to 9pm to working just 12 hours a day. This is also popular with the women because they were working less hours a day for more pay. ...read more.

Middle

In the photograph, women work on and in the background there is a blackboard with a message on it. The message reads 'when the boys come back we are not going to keep you any longer- girls'. This shows that women, in some eyes, were not needed to help win the war. This source is very reliable as it is reality. However if the girls had not of been working in that factory Britain would have lost the war because they would of ran out of munition. Source E is propaganda. It is a poster published by the British government in 1916. It was to encourage young women to working munitions factories. The picture is of a soldier walking out of a door as the women is putting on her overalls as if she was going to work. There is a message which say's 'These women are doing their bit'. I don't think that this source is very reliable as it is propaganda published by the British government. It is not reality; it is a message to play on womens' minds and make them feel guilty if they do not work. However this worked and if it had not then fewer men would have been able to fight the war as they would have had to stay behind to work. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, I do not agree with the source as the 'man' probably did not see the reason why there was women working everywhere. They were just helping Britain to win the war by filling in for the men as they fought the war. Source J is a painting 'for king and country' by E.F Skinner, 1917. The painting shows women working very hard in dresses. I think that the source is not very reliable as the women would probably not wear dresses to work in a factory. However the name of the painting, 'for king and country', suggests that the painter also thought that the women were paying a vital role in helping Britain to win the war. From my point of view, 'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain could not have won the First World War'. I agree with this statement, as do several of the sources, because who could have kept the munitions factories going to keep producing the munition for the men at war? Who could of tried to keep routine things such as buses and trains e.c.t to running as smooth as clockwork? Some men may not agree with this statement because they do not see it through a womens point of view, but if women had not of been able to work Britain would probably not be an independent country today because there would have been a shortage in everything including soldiers, workers, munition e.c.t. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    its military future would establish both a general staff and a railway department. It had been shown that without a general staff body to "...integrate its transport and mobilisation policies..." a state must "...risk defeat at the hands of another that did..."

  2. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    Ultimately, it was to create a divide between Nicholas and his people and again catalysed future reform as a result. The war was never popular in Russia. The public had not been prepared for war. It occurred suddenly and it did not lead to an outbreak of spontaneous patriotism.

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    cars, cornering all the best jobs, and while so many profiteers were waxing rich. The draft was not completely fair since ot all men were sent to the trenches. Skilled workers were more important to industry and some could secure safe assignments at home.

  2. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    which obviously helped in the manufacturing of munitions, saving food for soldiers, keeping the economy stable and saving lives on the home front. Many were encouraged to attend USO balls where they danced and befriended lonely soldiers, young women had freedom social as well, and this also allowed them to enjoy the war and the new experiences it entailed.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    would be little actual fighting, but also because there was no slow build-up of bombing. When the Blitz started in earnest in September 1940, it came without warning and there were signs of real panic. The government attempted to maintain morale by publishing stories of bravery and determination, which created the impression that 'Britain could take it'.

  2. Attitudes towards Women in World War II - Sources Questions

    This does affect the accuracy of the source as it is not designed to inform readers about attitudes to women during WWII. Overall this source is not reliable, just by looking at the end of the cartoon this is obvious; the husband thinks the pudding is homemade.

  1. 'Propaganda Was an Essential Weapon In the War Against Germany’ - To ...

    In actual fact the tank was not such a successful weapon it was slow and sluggish and often got caught in mud as battles ensued making the tank an ineffective weapon in these situations. However the tank did have its positives it was a very strong vehicle which could withstand heavy fire and arsenal.

  2. How Did the Nuremberg Trials Work and Who Was Tried and Why?

    He understood what was going on and didn?t fear for his life because he knew all of the things he did were wrong. Walther Funk was minister of economics from 1937 to 1945 (Goldensohn 76).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work