• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain should not have won the first world war' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Katherine Dickinson 'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain should not have won the first world war' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view. When war broke out in 1914, most people in Britain expected that it would be over in a matter of months. Accordingly to the slogan of the government, it was 'business as usual'. Only gradually did the full horror begin when to dawn, and with, the mobilization of the nation to win the war at all costs. One of these was to allow women to replace mens' places at work. This was not very popular with the men, but with the women it was. Source A, a letter written in 1976 by a woman who lived and worked through the First World War, explains why. In the source she writes how there was a pay increase from �2 a month to �5 a week. This was obviously popular with the women as they can now afford to buy the essentials that themselves and their family needed. She also tells of how her working hours were cut from 6am to 9pm to working just 12 hours a day. This is also popular with the women because they were working less hours a day for more pay. ...read more.

Middle

In the photograph, women work on and in the background there is a blackboard with a message on it. The message reads 'when the boys come back we are not going to keep you any longer- girls'. This shows that women, in some eyes, were not needed to help win the war. This source is very reliable as it is reality. However if the girls had not of been working in that factory Britain would have lost the war because they would of ran out of munition. Source E is propaganda. It is a poster published by the British government in 1916. It was to encourage young women to working munitions factories. The picture is of a soldier walking out of a door as the women is putting on her overalls as if she was going to work. There is a message which say's 'These women are doing their bit'. I don't think that this source is very reliable as it is propaganda published by the British government. It is not reality; it is a message to play on womens' minds and make them feel guilty if they do not work. However this worked and if it had not then fewer men would have been able to fight the war as they would have had to stay behind to work. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, I do not agree with the source as the 'man' probably did not see the reason why there was women working everywhere. They were just helping Britain to win the war by filling in for the men as they fought the war. Source J is a painting 'for king and country' by E.F Skinner, 1917. The painting shows women working very hard in dresses. I think that the source is not very reliable as the women would probably not wear dresses to work in a factory. However the name of the painting, 'for king and country', suggests that the painter also thought that the women were paying a vital role in helping Britain to win the war. From my point of view, 'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain could not have won the First World War'. I agree with this statement, as do several of the sources, because who could have kept the munitions factories going to keep producing the munition for the men at war? Who could of tried to keep routine things such as buses and trains e.c.t to running as smooth as clockwork? Some men may not agree with this statement because they do not see it through a womens point of view, but if women had not of been able to work Britain would probably not be an independent country today because there would have been a shortage in everything including soldiers, workers, munition e.c.t. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    The propaganda attempted to show rationing as a positive stimulating event instead of the gloomier perspective of limited uninteresting food. Rationing could have lowered morale which would have been detrimental to the countries overall efficiency, but by giving people all these new ideas and things to do preoccupied their thoughts.

  2. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    In Germany, in May 1916, 50,000 Berlin works held a three-day walkout to protest the arrest of the pacifist Karl Liebknecht. By the end of the war most had rejected the government offer of being integrated in the beaurocracy, but not without playing an important public role and gaining some advantages such as collective bargaining.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    1991 and 1992 saw considerable advancement in efforts to reassert state control over Lebanese territory. The militias were dissolved in May 1991 with the important exception of Hizballah and units of Amal so that they can carry on the fight to oust the Israelis from Lebanon, and the armed forces moved against armed Palestinian elements in Sidon in July 1991.

  2. Discuss Trotsky's View that War was the Locomotive of History (1855-1914)

    Although Emancipation failed in its aims, Alexander could not have acted sooner in attempting to implement change, and he did so very valiantly in a way in which none of his predecessors managed to do more than talk about. The fact that emancipation still left the empire far behind much

  1. China After World War II

    But before the ink was dry on this document fighting broke out again and it has been continuing sporadically ever since. The ulcers of civil war, springing from the acute ailments at the base of Chinese society, will not yield to the balm of the American dollar.

  2. Vietnam source based work

    Source K is a song which comes across as an anti war song. In the chorus it says 'Open up the Pearly Gates. Ain't no time to wonder why we're all gonna die!' This is referring to the gates of heaven.

  1. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    that Germany's behaviour prior to 1914 was the sole cause of the First World War. In the 1960s, Fritz Fischer resurrected the theory that Germany was to blame for WWI (World War I). By this point in time, historians had accepted other theories as WWI causes; with the majority rejecting

  2. How Did the Nuremberg Trials Work and Who Was Tried and Why?

    Goering?s trial ended in him being sentenced to death by hanging. Two hours before this scheduled execution, on October 15, 1946 he committed suicide in his cell (Goldensohn 101). Goering?s case was one of the more complex and more interesting cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work