• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory' How far do you agree with this verdict?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory' How far do you agree with this verdict? Wolsey's political principles have been subject to much criticism since his death and to this day historians continue to disagree regarding its validity. The title denies that Wolsey had any 'guiding political principles'1, however traditional accounts of his foreign policy have attempted to attribute to Wolsey a coherent policy and motivation. In the eighteenth and nineteenth century the emphasis was on Wolsey as 'impresario of a European, balance of power'. A.Pollard2 considered that the motive of Wolsey's foreign policy was primarily concern for the papacy; he considered that ' as long as Wolsey pulled levers of English diplomacy Henry VIII remained the favourite son of the Roman church'. Others argued that Wolsey was first and foremost a crusader of peace, supported by his part in the treaty of London in 1518 and the Field of the Cloth of Gold meeting in 1520. This theory however must account for Wolsey's tendency to abandon his aims of peace in order to appease Henry VIII's desire to prove himself through successes on the battlefield. ...read more.

Middle

Later 'revisionists' took this idea and came to the conclusion that the England's success between 1514 were largely due to Wolsey, and its failures to Henry VIII. However it is unlikely that Wolsey's quest for peace drove Wolsey's diplomacy in 1523 when, unlike a more sceptical Henry VIII, he not merely 'endorsed plans for invasion and partition of France, but he did so with genuine enthusiasm'8. Wolsey's later triumph is surely inconsistent with his supposed Christian humanist pacifism. Finally his vigorous demands for the 'amicable grant' could only have been because he agreed with Henry that the partition of France was finally within England's grasp following Charles V's victory at Pavia. From these discrepancies historians such as John Guy have concluded that Wolsey's foreign policy was 'pragmatic and opportunist: designed to win power and glory for henry VIII whether in war or peace'9. In Renaissance diplomacy, reputation and the security of the land were arguably most important. Essentially Wolsey's task regarding his foreign policies was to fulfil through whatever means, Henry VIII's desire to make England great again and be a real rival to Charles V and Francis I. ...read more.

Conclusion

The people of England however were unlikely to be impressed with this side of Wolsey's diplomacy, since to them it was mainly about vanity, but in this matter Wolsey was Henry's servant. The King's expectations on Wolsey's foreign policy were 'unrealistic, even absurd. His task was to do the impossible. That he did so for over a decade is a tribute to his Tran formative genius11. I do agree with the verdict that 'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory'. The reason that there is such difficulty for Historians to discover Wolsey's guiding political principles is because he had none. His policies although her did undoubtedly prefer peace were manoeuvred according to the whims of Henry VIII, and 'by this means bring honour to is master- and of course, to himself'12. Michelle Eskinazi 1 Tudor England-John Guy 2 A Pollard was writing in 1929 and was the first historian to propose a clear explanatory thesis after reading transcripts of Wolsey's diplomatic correspondence. 3 The King's Cardinal- Peter Gwyn 4 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 5 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 6 Cardinal Wolsey- John Guy 7 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 8 Tudor England- John Guy 9 Tudor England- John Guy 10 Tudor England- John Guy 11 Tudor England- John Guy 12 The King's Cardinal- Peter Gwyn ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay has a really good clear style and confident tone. The student demonstrates good knowledge of the period which is used confidently to support and develop the judgements. There is also good us of a range of historians views. At time these are used to illustrate and it would be even better if the views of the historians were used too.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 25/06/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The most important reason for Wolseys fall from power was his failure to obtain ...

    5 star(s)

    This included the Amicable Grant of 1525. The Amicable Grant was an attempt by Wolsey to pose a new property tax to fund Henry's expedition to France but it was highly unpopular. Once again this affected Henry, who wanted to remain popular among the public as well as gain money for war.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    mark as a King who was not afraid of using battles and war, as methods of foreign political interaction. This was markedly different to his father's stance; Henry VII had been reluctant to fight wars because of the immense cost.

  1. What were the aims of English Foreign Policy 1529-1558?

    This then drew France into the conflict, and so Henry ended up at war with two countries attacking him from different sides. After Henry's death, Edward was put on the throne, and the Duke of Somerset installed himself as regent.

  2. Why was there a revolution in France in 1789

    to marry into the Bourgeois, knowing that they would financially gain from it, and the Bourgeois would have a cheaper way of obtaining that increasingly important title. The county was also geographically divided. Within France there were 39 Provincial Governments, each with one Governor, but they had no real authority, they were puppets, controlled by the King.

  1. Oliver Cromwell - Hero or Villain?

    Some of the things that Oliver Cromwell did were terrible! One of the things that he sent his army to do was nail a baby, an innocent baby, to a church door. What was the point of that? I mean what was he trying to prove?

  2. Henry VIII foreign policy

    This was a problem as he had to get permission to marry her as she was her brother's widow. No pope should ever overturn any decision of another since they are god's voice on earth so what they say god says and if 1 pope says another is wrong that means god was wrong.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    Also there had been inefficiency and dishonesty. He also continued the work done by the Yorkists in restoring crown lands which had been that one way. or another, and by gathering more land at. every opportunity Henry- was particularly good at annexing the lands of all those involved in acts of treason against his throne.

  2. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    Finally Scotland, Mary of Guise, mother of Mary Queen of Scots had put French troops in Scotland creating a threat to England and maybe a war that England couldn't fund. They also like France supported Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth?s safety was under threat as many people would kill Elizabeth to secure Mary becoming Queen of England.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work