• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory' How far do you agree with this verdict?

Extracts from this document...


'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory' How far do you agree with this verdict? Wolsey's political principles have been subject to much criticism since his death and to this day historians continue to disagree regarding its validity. The title denies that Wolsey had any 'guiding political principles'1, however traditional accounts of his foreign policy have attempted to attribute to Wolsey a coherent policy and motivation. In the eighteenth and nineteenth century the emphasis was on Wolsey as 'impresario of a European, balance of power'. A.Pollard2 considered that the motive of Wolsey's foreign policy was primarily concern for the papacy; he considered that ' as long as Wolsey pulled levers of English diplomacy Henry VIII remained the favourite son of the Roman church'. Others argued that Wolsey was first and foremost a crusader of peace, supported by his part in the treaty of London in 1518 and the Field of the Cloth of Gold meeting in 1520. This theory however must account for Wolsey's tendency to abandon his aims of peace in order to appease Henry VIII's desire to prove himself through successes on the battlefield. ...read more.


Later 'revisionists' took this idea and came to the conclusion that the England's success between 1514 were largely due to Wolsey, and its failures to Henry VIII. However it is unlikely that Wolsey's quest for peace drove Wolsey's diplomacy in 1523 when, unlike a more sceptical Henry VIII, he not merely 'endorsed plans for invasion and partition of France, but he did so with genuine enthusiasm'8. Wolsey's later triumph is surely inconsistent with his supposed Christian humanist pacifism. Finally his vigorous demands for the 'amicable grant' could only have been because he agreed with Henry that the partition of France was finally within England's grasp following Charles V's victory at Pavia. From these discrepancies historians such as John Guy have concluded that Wolsey's foreign policy was 'pragmatic and opportunist: designed to win power and glory for henry VIII whether in war or peace'9. In Renaissance diplomacy, reputation and the security of the land were arguably most important. Essentially Wolsey's task regarding his foreign policies was to fulfil through whatever means, Henry VIII's desire to make England great again and be a real rival to Charles V and Francis I. ...read more.


The people of England however were unlikely to be impressed with this side of Wolsey's diplomacy, since to them it was mainly about vanity, but in this matter Wolsey was Henry's servant. The King's expectations on Wolsey's foreign policy were 'unrealistic, even absurd. His task was to do the impossible. That he did so for over a decade is a tribute to his Tran formative genius11. I do agree with the verdict that 'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his master's power and his own glory'. The reason that there is such difficulty for Historians to discover Wolsey's guiding political principles is because he had none. His policies although her did undoubtedly prefer peace were manoeuvred according to the whims of Henry VIII, and 'by this means bring honour to is master- and of course, to himself'12. Michelle Eskinazi 1 Tudor England-John Guy 2 A Pollard was writing in 1929 and was the first historian to propose a clear explanatory thesis after reading transcripts of Wolsey's diplomatic correspondence. 3 The King's Cardinal- Peter Gwyn 4 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 5 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 6 Cardinal Wolsey- John Guy 7 Henry VIII- J.Scarsbrick 8 Tudor England- John Guy 9 Tudor England- John Guy 10 Tudor England- John Guy 11 Tudor England- John Guy 12 The King's Cardinal- Peter Gwyn ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay has a really good clear style and confident tone. The student demonstrates good knowledge of the period which is used confidently to support and develop the judgements. There is also good us of a range of historians views. At time these are used to illustrate and it would be even better if the views of the historians were used too.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 25/06/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    mark as a King who was not afraid of using battles and war, as methods of foreign political interaction. This was markedly different to his father's stance; Henry VII had been reluctant to fight wars because of the immense cost.

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    This was a strong point for Elizabeth because it meant there would be no problem of people attempting to overthrow her in a struggle for power at the beginning of her reign. It also meant any decision Elizabeth finally chose to make was absolute.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    A religious development had threatened parliament as much favour was shown towards Arminians. The matter of the growth of Arminianism and the current actions of them became apparent as a regular discussion point during parliament, although mostly during Charles reign.

  2. What were the aims of English Foreign Policy 1529-1558?

    This then drew France into the conflict, and so Henry ended up at war with two countries attacking him from different sides. After Henry's death, Edward was put on the throne, and the Duke of Somerset installed himself as regent.

  1. Creative Writing: A Gothic Story

    It's fun up here!" So the young boys hurried up the stairs into the bedroom, ready to give James a good kick.

  2. Why was there a revolution in France in 1789

    to marry into the Bourgeois, knowing that they would financially gain from it, and the Bourgeois would have a cheaper way of obtaining that increasingly important title. The county was also geographically divided. Within France there were 39 Provincial Governments, each with one Governor, but they had no real authority, they were puppets, controlled by the King.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    so its effectiveness with the government are not to be taken to seriously. What parliament did though was to help the king gain more authority. Statute law made by parliament was the highest law in the land, and parliament's recognition of Henry's right to rule was highly important to a

  2. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    their influence in the government in the northern counties and increase their financial and political fortunes. To finish, Essex?s rebellion was a weak revolt against Elizabeth and Robert Cecil. Essex?s revolt was his last attempt to restore his influence after his humiliating defeat and barging in to Elizabeth?s bedchamber without her permission.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work