• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Women and the War Effort in Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Women and the War Effort in Britain Jas Singh 10D Teacher - Mrs Ball 1) Source B is the front cover of the War Worker magazine, which was written in 1917. It shows a British Soldier holding a flag of the Union Jack, along with a female worker also holding a Union Jack. In the background of the picture we can see factories and industries and vast electricity pylons. The impression that we are meant to be getting is that men and women are both united in a common cause, and that cause is to work together to help win the war. It also tells us that the women back in Britain are just as important to the war effort as the men fighting on the frontline are. However, Source B cannot be trusted as it comes from a propaganda magazine, and so it is inevitable that the magazine has a different purpose. It was produced primarily to encourage women to support the war effort, and to persuade women to find work, and so some of the information in the magazine and indeed on the front cover may have not been truthful - it was just trying to convince the women. Therefore, we must question the reliability of this source. Whereas Source B was saying how attitudes towards women had improved, Source F is saying the opposite, saying that, "Attitudes to women workers remained, in many instances, negative." ...read more.

Middle

Source C tells us how the role of women had changed from the old "for men must work and women must weep." Women had proved successfully that they could do her share in times of crisis and that her contribution to the war effort was equally as vital as the men's contribution. Source I tells us how women had demonstrated practically their claim to equality with men, as they took on all the jobs that men had done in the past, and even set up their own Land Army. It goes on to tell us how even through danger and very risky hazards, the women continued to work in the munitions factories, and that now the role of women was no longer to be despised as their efforts and transformed their roles in society. Source J, 'The Duchess of Duke Street,' shows us how women of all classes united to help to war work, such as holding buffets for soldiers. In this instance, the women converted houses into hospitals for the sick. This demonstrates how the women were united in a common cause and how they put in lots of effort in aid of the war cause. However, we have to question the reliability of these sources. Source A is taken from The Daily Chronicle newspaper, from the 19th July 1915. At this time in the war, the British Government had put newspaper censorship into operation, which meant that the government had complete control over everything that the newspapers wrote. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1919, a law was passed which meant that being female or married was no longer allowed to disqualify someone from holding a job in the professions or civil service. In 1923, a law was passed which meant women were given the same right as men to seek divorce on the grounds of adultery. In 1923 and 1925 the Property Acts allowed married women to hold and dispose of property on the same terms as their husbands. Again in 1925 widows and dependant children were entitled to pension benefits, and finally in 1928 all women over 21 were allowed to vote. However, in work the transformation of women's status was not so apparent. Women were expected to give way to men returning from the forces and to return to pre-war 'women's work'. The assumption that 'a woman's place is in the home' returned. The percentage of women at work returned to pre-war levels, although more women worked in offices than ever before. In conclusion, I believe that Sources A to J do not prove that the First World War transformed the status of women in British society. I believe that the sources are too unreliable, and we have to question whether we can trust the information they give. My own knowledge supports the sources that don't believe that the status of women was transformed, and my own knowledge disagrees with the sources that believe that the status of women was transformed. Therefore, I have to believe that Sources A to J do not prove that the First World War transformed the status of women in British society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    A new harsher fugitive slave law.? - Yeah, it wasn't so much a decision as it was an evasion [bought time for nation, some say it won war for North b/c it gave them more time to finish industrializing]. - The two major problems with the compromise were as follows: The new Fugitive Slave Act: basically it allowed slave-owners to go into?

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    After the First World War, David Lloyd George had announced that he was going to build 'homes fit for heroes to live in', but the economic problems of the inter-war years had prevented major changes. By 1942 there was even more powerful evidence of the need for change.

  1. In what ways did World War I affect the lives of civilians in Britain ...

    However, despite the government's many efforts, production continued to drop and shortages increased. For example, from 1913 to 1917, agricultural production had dropped by 50 to 70 percent and Industrial production by 30 to 40 percent. The nitrate began to be used for munitions, and therefore became unavailable for fertilizer.

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the governments in Britain and Germany in maintaining the war ...

    Germany used literature like in Appendix 3 to promote hate of Britain, but was painting it in a more aggressive tone, rather than showing the German people why they should hate them. An important factor in the strengths and weaknesses of the propaganda of both countries is how well the literature is received.

  1. Britain and the First World War - Women and the War Effort in Britain ...

    It should be reliable as it was written a long time after the events of which it talks so there should be no emotional attachment and should draw from a number of earlier sources.

  2. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    These are that it could have been taken by suffragettes to show the people of England that the women are working very hard for their country even though they might have a tough time fitting in with the male workers.

  1. In 1915 a British Newspaper printed a letter from a 'Lady Reader' who claimed, ...

    The British public had been told that the war would last six weeks and the soldiers would be home by Christmas and were told this by the newspapers, the Church, the government and the army's generals. Throughout Europe thousands of men joined up to fight for their country.

  2. Women at War: Source work

    country, which is obviously not true as women had been working in industry for some time, these women were nearly all working class, but their contribution to industry had been present for some time. Although the source is prejudiced in this way, it must not be dismissed as completely unreliable

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work