• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Question

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

World War One Sources Question a) The main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was to win a war over France so that Germany could become the most powerful country in Europe. However if, as the Germans thought, France's ally Russia would come to help the French then the Germans would have to split up their army as Russia bordered Germany on one side and France the other therefore Germany would have to fight a war on two fronts. The Germans therefore thought up a plan that would enable them to fight only one country at a time. The plan was that Russia would take six to ten weeks to mobilise their army, after they had heard about the war, as Russia's railways and roads were quite backward and it would take time to assemble all their men from all over the country. This would give the Germans enough time to defeat France. The problem was how to defeat France in just six weeks when the French already had troops along the French/German border and behind the troops were heavily fortified towns. The Germans needed to launch a surprise attack on France if they were going to achieve their objective of winning a war over France. ...read more.

Middle

c) New technology had to be brought into action in World War 1 as each side wanted a victory and therefore needed good weapons. The tank was first used in World War 1, however, the idea was not new it just had not been taken seriously by army experts. Tanks were useful in ending the stalemate because they could help the infantry break into enemy lines. Also when tanks were first used in World War 1 they shocked the Germans and they terrified some of the front line troops. Tanks are best remembered for their attack on Cambrai in November 1917 where they managed to create a hole ten kilometres wide and six metres deep through the German lines. However tanks were unreliable and often broke down during battle, some run out of petrol and others were damaged by artillery fire, and were not a safe place to be in. They were also very slow, at the beginning they were not even as fast as walking pace (2 mph on the road, 1/2 mph cross country) and by the end of the war they were slightly faster (4mph) but they still could not move quickly or with much ease. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the offensive must have had some part to play in the ending of stalemate. All of the above points were important in breaking the stalemate on the Western Front. However I think that the new technology used was less pivotal than the rest because although the technology was important the tank was hardly ever used and was unreliable and gas also was not used a lot so did not help in ending the stalemate. I cannot say that one point is the most important as they are all linked together. For example if the Allies had not blockaded the German ports then the Ludendorff Offensive might have never happened because the Germans might have stayed in a defensive position and not attack as there was no reason to. However when food riots did happen they needed to attack so that they could win and get the ports unblocked. Another example of how they are linked is that if the Americans had not entered the war then the Germans might have won the Ludendorff offensive as they outnumbered the Allies without the Americans and not have had low morale and have been tired of fighting. Overall I think that the statement is correct in saying that they are all equally important in finally breaking stalemate on the Western Front. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

**/***
The essay has some valid points, and knowledge and understanding of the relevant content is good. The answer would benefit from better organisation (factor-led) and an avoidance of the tendency to write short, brief paragraphs with narrative. It is important to demonstrate a level of thinking and the answer would benefit from more explicit links to the question.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Creative Writing - War.

    I was placed in 'Quick Arrow', a ground troop regiment of the British army. Our group had earned its name because of the speed and accuracy we had shown on training operations. On the 21st December, after three months of training in Southampton, we were sent to a large British base in Singapore.

  2. The Impact of the French colonisation of Vietnam

    However with the tax revenue, the French built a railway from Hanoi to Saigon, ports, irrigation and drainage systems, research institutes and other public services. This infrastructure is a legacy left behind by the French that the Vietnamese people continue to benefit from.

  1. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    This German action dramatically led the USA to enter the war on the allies side, because its passenger ship, the Lusitania was sunk and led to the death of nearly 2000 lives, most of them American.

  2. Was World War 1 Inevitable?

    In an alliance, two or more countries have an agreement to help each other in case of a war.

  1. The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you ...

    Conflict during this period was not solely restricted to the German Princes and their allies, this after all the Thirty Years' war involved every major European nation. Therefore, the remainder of this essay will look at the Dutch Republics conflict with Spain and Frances conflict with Spain in an attempt

  2. How did the Vietnam War Have an Impact on Canada

    Works Cited " BBC NEWS | Americas | US deserter's Canadian campaign ." BBC News - Home. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3867481.stm (accessed May 22, 2011). "Canada's Secret War: Vietnam | CBC Archives." CBC Archives. http://archives.cbc.ca/war_conflict/vietnam_war/topics/1413-9128/ (accessed May 22, 2011). Jones, Joseph . "Historical Notes on Vietnam War Resisters in Canada."

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    She knew that she could not fight a war and defend her empire, and the protection of the empire was her first priority. By pursuing a policy of appeasement Britain managed to protect her empire at a time when this was very important to her.

  2. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    Historians use the above as evidence to suggest that Germany were not geographically in a position to start a war, therefore the war could not have been a long standing intention. In contrast there is much evidence in which to suggest that Germany were to blame for the outbreak of war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work