• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Question

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

World War One Sources Question a) The main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was to win a war over France so that Germany could become the most powerful country in Europe. However if, as the Germans thought, France's ally Russia would come to help the French then the Germans would have to split up their army as Russia bordered Germany on one side and France the other therefore Germany would have to fight a war on two fronts. The Germans therefore thought up a plan that would enable them to fight only one country at a time. The plan was that Russia would take six to ten weeks to mobilise their army, after they had heard about the war, as Russia's railways and roads were quite backward and it would take time to assemble all their men from all over the country. This would give the Germans enough time to defeat France. The problem was how to defeat France in just six weeks when the French already had troops along the French/German border and behind the troops were heavily fortified towns. The Germans needed to launch a surprise attack on France if they were going to achieve their objective of winning a war over France. ...read more.

Middle

c) New technology had to be brought into action in World War 1 as each side wanted a victory and therefore needed good weapons. The tank was first used in World War 1, however, the idea was not new it just had not been taken seriously by army experts. Tanks were useful in ending the stalemate because they could help the infantry break into enemy lines. Also when tanks were first used in World War 1 they shocked the Germans and they terrified some of the front line troops. Tanks are best remembered for their attack on Cambrai in November 1917 where they managed to create a hole ten kilometres wide and six metres deep through the German lines. However tanks were unreliable and often broke down during battle, some run out of petrol and others were damaged by artillery fire, and were not a safe place to be in. They were also very slow, at the beginning they were not even as fast as walking pace (2 mph on the road, 1/2 mph cross country) and by the end of the war they were slightly faster (4mph) but they still could not move quickly or with much ease. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the offensive must have had some part to play in the ending of stalemate. All of the above points were important in breaking the stalemate on the Western Front. However I think that the new technology used was less pivotal than the rest because although the technology was important the tank was hardly ever used and was unreliable and gas also was not used a lot so did not help in ending the stalemate. I cannot say that one point is the most important as they are all linked together. For example if the Allies had not blockaded the German ports then the Ludendorff Offensive might have never happened because the Germans might have stayed in a defensive position and not attack as there was no reason to. However when food riots did happen they needed to attack so that they could win and get the ports unblocked. Another example of how they are linked is that if the Americans had not entered the war then the Germans might have won the Ludendorff offensive as they outnumbered the Allies without the Americans and not have had low morale and have been tired of fighting. Overall I think that the statement is correct in saying that they are all equally important in finally breaking stalemate on the Western Front. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

**/***
The essay has some valid points, and knowledge and understanding of the relevant content is good. The answer would benefit from better organisation (factor-led) and an avoidance of the tendency to write short, brief paragraphs with narrative. It is important to demonstrate a level of thinking and the answer would benefit from more explicit links to the question.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. In What Ways Did World War One Impact American Society?

    worked closely together and managed to prevent strikes. But labour soon fell apart afterwards. There were many divisions, socialists, communists and radicals and they each tried to influence politics through local government. Workers realised that they were much more valuable and were essential for America to go to war as there was an increased demand for unskilled labour.

  2. How did the World War II affect America?

    There were also changes to the politics of America, and the way they were run. The wartime president was Franklin D Roosevelt, and he was a democrat, but he met fierce republican opposition over his "new deal" policy, which was meant to drag America out of its wartime depression.

  1. The impact of World War 1 on American society.

    Also prices had doubled between 1914 and 1919, while wages had pretty much stayed the same. This resulted in violent strikes, which went on throughout 1919.

  2. The Impact of the French colonisation of Vietnam

    However with the tax revenue, the French built a railway from Hanoi to Saigon, ports, irrigation and drainage systems, research institutes and other public services. This infrastructure is a legacy left behind by the French that the Vietnamese people continue to benefit from.

  1. What were the causes of the Korean War (1950-1953)?

    These both relatively new governments succeeded the temporary occupation of soviet and American troops in the North and South respectively, some historians may argue that it was in fact the departure of foreign troops that led to the events of the Korean War with the Americans leaving first in 1948 and the Soviet troops leaving North Korea in 1949.

  2. Explain how the Vietnam War affected Australian society and/or its relationships with the rest ...

    Moreover, the unpopularity of Australian involvement in the Vietnam War had a substantially negative impact on Australian society's acceptance of returning soldiers and veterans at the time and of future generations. Incongruous to the Australian traditions and practices that recall the sacrifices of Australians who served and died in World

  1. Can War Be Justified?

    However, it is controversial as to whether countries at which a war is not directed at should join that war: they often worsen the situation by interfering. Debating whether or not to go to war in defence of a neighbour presents a 'right vs.

  2. Was World War 1 Inevitable?

    In an alliance, two or more countries have an agreement to help each other in case of a war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work