• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Question

Extracts from this document...


Question 1: Source A describes the optimism and confidence shown by General Rawlinson. He thought that at the main attack there would be minimal losses to his men if the artillery worked to plan. He thought that the Somme would remind the men of Salisbury plain, a place where the men trained, therefore it would boost the morale of the troops. Rawlinson says " it is a great improvement on the flat muddy plains of Flanders." This was a place destroyed to a quagmire during previous attacks. The weather and conditions would be perfect for a decent attack. The observation points would provide good hit rates for the artillery, whereas at Flanders this was not the case. Rawlinson quoted " it is excellent country on which to undertake an offensive when we get enough artillery, for the observation is excellent." The battle, according to Rawlinson, would be very easy for the infantry advance. This would be the case only if there had been good artillery attack and good conditions for the advance. The flat land would provide perfect advancing and infantry positions. These factors and points made by Rawlinson show us the way he perceived the battle to be like. This idea of an infantry 'cake-walk' and an 'artillery barrage' were seen as the tactics that would result in a break-through on the front lines. ...read more.


Their use of machine-guns upon slowly marching men were never examined. They ignored evidence from other wars in which the machine gun was used in trench warfare, e.g. US Civil war, Boer War. Question3: Sources D, E and F all give different accounts of the Somme. Source D is an optimistic picture of the fist of the British Army punching a German on the nose, where the Somme is placed. This was published in a wartime newspaper. The Government censored the press during wartime. They did this in order to keep morale high for the public. They did not show the poor conditions, only positive points of the war. The source was published in July, after the attack. The results were not known by then so an optimistic view was given. This cartoon was used to promote confidence to those who had seen it. The person who drew it would not have known the true results. This explains why it is drawn in an optimistic way, if it had been a disaster it could not have been drawn. Source E is an extract from A E Ellis, an ordinary soldier who took part in the offensive. The source is his diary, which he kept at the time of the war. ...read more.


The two sources may have been written in two different places. Ellis talks about the 46th division, who were based in the North of the offensive. Source F may have been written in a different place where the original offensives had worked to a point. This is not described in the sources so the reasons ofor differences are unknown. Source D is a typical picture during the time. It represents the optimism and confidence of the High-Command. Though as the results of the attack were unknown it was unable to depict the actual results. However they would never have been shown, as this would bring the morale down within Britain. Source D does not describe the way in which Ellis felt about the attacks. They are different in their views of the war and so do not hold the same purpose. The provenances of the sources are all different. Source D is an artificial description of the war, published to the public, without correct knowledge of the attack. Source E is an account after a failed and bloody-battle. It depicts the way in which a soldier would feel after witnessing such a failure of tactics in the British Army. Source F is an extract from an officer after the war in a time of recrimination. He may have just been keen to exonerate the blame from his fellow men or he may have been recounting what had happened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    World War One Sources Question

    3 star(s)

    British help, getting through and surround Paris (see diagram). The Germans would then take Paris and cause the French to surrender. Once this was accomplished the German army could then concentrate all its forces on fighting Russia. b) Stalemate developed on the Western Front for many different reasons. The Schlieffen Plan failing was one reason as to why stalemate developed.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Question

    The rest of source C does not give any reasons for US involvement in Vietnam but describes the kind of things these young American soldiers were doing in Vietnam.

  1. World War One Sources Questions

    A major weakness is that even though we are shown a lot about trench warfare on the western front, we are not shown any military aspects of the war. For example there is nothing to indicate what battles these men fought in, also we are not told about any historical figures such as Field Marshall Haig.

  2. Evaluation of key sources to address the question of increased tension

    The fact that Khrushchev refuses to talk to Eisenhower shows increased tension and how much he dislikes Eisenhower. As the source says itself, 'East-West tensions were increased rather than reduced.' The Paris conference was a total failure and only heightened tension between the two superpowers.

  1. American History.

    - Boy did he pick the wrong topic - as soon as he mentioned the thing, the whole differing interpretations of popular sovereignty deal exploded. To make matters worse, K&N were on the non-slavery side of the Missouri line, so using PS there would invalidate the whole Missouri Compromise too!

  2. WW1 Sources Question: War Recruitment Propaganda.

    Both sources reinforce the pro-war euphoria in Britain. Source H is an honest account of the front line, which would undermine the pro-war fever in Britain and could have been written after 1916.6)Sources J and I portray two very different images of conditions in the trenches.

  1. Vietnam Assignment – History Sources Question

    "Their was no Vietcong territory to invade and conquer... they (US) could never claim to have advanced so many kilometres" and because of this were unable to brag bout how well they where getting on to their citizens enticing more to join up. America also had the wrong tactics from the offset "...because the battle was in their own country the Vietcong could afford to wait years for victory...

  2. Vietnam Question 2

    There is also another soldier taking a photograph behind the children, which begs the question: If the war is against communism, why are children being targeted? Source E is very useful because it is a photograph by an American photographer and seems to be unbiased.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work