• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Kayleigh Hay 11ms History coursework Question 1. In this question I intend to examine each source, A and B, to find out which source is more reliable for giving information about bombardment in world war 1. Bombardment took place when soldiers bombed enemy defences with heavy artillery. The idea was for all this artillery fire to kill the defending soldiers or force them to retreat. Bombardment was unsuccessful because the artillery couldn't destroy the trench systems or cut through barbed wire. Source A is a piece of text, this is taken from 'Britain at war 1914 - 1919' a textbook written by Craig Mair in 1982. This passage is about the Battle of the Somme, 1916 and is a secondary source. A first sight this tells me that the passage may not be as reliable as a primary piece of evidence. Source B is a photograph taken in 1916 at the remains of a German machine -gun post near Guillemont. The photographer's name isn't mentioned. This is a primary source as it is taken at the time. This may mean the source is reliable. The passage in source A only tells us about the effects of bombardment in the Battle on the Somme, but doesn't mention bombardment in the whole of world war 1. Also all the information in the text only shows the negative aspects of bombardment. The text says nothing positive about artillery bombardment. Source A also suggests the bombardment wasn't successful at all, When in fact we are told that bombardment had limited successes. The photograph in source B shows us a destroyed German machine -gun post. There are dead bodies in the photograph which we are lead to believe are German soldiers. This source suggests that preliminary bombardment was a success. The photograph was taken in 1916 around the time of the Battle of the Somme. I don't feel this makes the source more reliable, as bombardment wasn't very successful during this time. ...read more.


The source also neglects to tell us anything about the preparations for attack and how they would use ground or aircraft reconnaissance. Snipers would have been used to kill soldiers if they looked over the trench wall. Also in the advert there is a man standing up in the trench, in reality this man would be shot dead on the spot. We are not told about illnesses or injuries caused by trench warfare. For example a lot of soldiers would have suffered 'shell shock'. They would have also suffered from things like blindness or loss of limbs. Finally we are not told about what happened behind the lines. In many areas, makeshift trenches and dressing stations were set up. Also, there were a lot of soldiers and support workers who helped during the war. Women also helped behind the lines, in Voluntary Aid Detachments (VAD) and the first-aid-nursing auxiliary (FANY). In 1917, a women's Army Auxiliary Corps was set up to cook and clean This source doesn't tell us anything about the reality of combat on the western front. It is most likely because that the advent would have been used to give a false image of war to the British public. Which helped to enlist more men into the army. Question 5: For source H we looked at a film called "all quiet on the western front". This film interprets aspects of war on the western front, in a very detailed way. This source is a story about a group of German teenagers who enlist in the German army. This source has a lot of strengths and weaknesses with regard to war on the western front. There are a number of strengths presented in the source. First of all, this film is an excellent representation of the barbarity of war. For example, the film shows full frontal attacks which took place continually during the course of the war. ...read more.


The poem gives us an insight into the incompetence of the Generals and the way in which the soldiers reacted to them. More importance, however is that the source suggests that the Generals actions prolonged the war. As we examine the list of sources; some appear much less useful when we try to understand why the war was prolonged. For example, Source H, a visual interpretation of the war on the western front, although showing some tactics used by the army, doesn't tell us about any major battles or military figures. These are the things we'd need to know if we want to find out exactly why the war was prolonged. But since some reference is made to full front attack, we are made aware that the tactic of attrition had some responsibility Source F is our next source on the scale of helpfulness. Source F is a poster; the poster shows soldiers smoking and was used for propaganda purposes in Britain. It gives a completely false impression of war on the western front. Posters such as these were used to give soldier's families' reassurance that they were having a heroic and adventurous time. This source gives us no information about why the war lasted so long, but it does tell us how propaganda was in Britain. Which may explain why people at home allowed to continue without protest The last source is the least useful in helping us understand why the war lasted so long. Source G is a primary source, which gives us some accurate information about trench life, but tells us nothing about why the war continued for four years. These sources only provide us with an indirect and limited understanding of why the war lasted as long as it did. When trying to understand why the war was prolonged we would need to access other information such as how politicians prolonged the war, reasons why the Schlieffen plan failed and the impact of new weapons on the war as a whole ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does the film 'The Battle of The Somme' provide us with a realistic picture ...

    3 star(s)

    However, other sources challenge the images shown in the film. Some sources suggest that at times during the War some of the soldiers went starved for a couple of days. For example some cartoons show that the army had bad rations and also that they didn't have enough food.

  2. The Marshall Plan.

    The Marshall Plan speech was deliberately low-key and no master plan was enunciated; the speech had just the right degree of vagueness to require European action, yet the right degree of specificity to excite it. In time, the Marshall Plan program that evolved from the planning of the first half

  1. Custer - Hero or villain?

    Custer was impatient and wanted instant glory, which he definitely achieved. To find a consistent answer to the question we are trying to interpret, let us quickly revise the definition of a hero: 1 a: a mythological or legendary

  2. American History.

    There were 5 basic aspects to the deal... CA came in as a free state.? Texas boundary kept at present limits but Texas given $10 million in? compensation for loss of territory to New Mexico. New Mexico and Utah territories to be decided by popular sovereignty.? Slave trade banned in Washington DC.? A new harsher fugitive slave law.?

  1. WW1 Sources Question: War Recruitment Propaganda.

    The generals would just send more and more men over the top of the trenches to be mown down by German machine guns.In conclusion, source E is a reliable source because it provides us with an example of the type of censorship that took place during the war.

  2. Attitudes towards Women in World War II - Sources Questions

    to a lot of sources from the time and she gave her opinions on these. Source D is a piece of propaganda which does give an attitude towards women but cannot be trusted. The sources are very useful when finding out about other different views and thoughts on women, but not about the attitude towards them.

  1. 'Propaganda Was an Essential Weapon In the War Against Germany’ - To ...

    Also the older generation could not do this as the might be quick enough or strong enough to do the job, this left only the women. This promotion aimed at people to grow their own food saved ships, money and men.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    Study Sources C, D and E Use the evidence of Sources C, D and E, and your own knowledge, to explain why the US forces were unable to defeat the Viet Cong. Source C is written by a volunteer who fought in Vietnam so it is a reliable description

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work