• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Would it be true to say that the soviet union never really controlled the satellite countries."

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Noah 3IBC "Would it be true to say that the soviet union never really controlled the satellite countries." After the end of the 2nd World War, the two great powers of the world USA and the Soviet had become the most important influence on the other countries in their hemisphere. In fact the Soviet was more than an influence on its neighbouring nations; it had control over 14 countries in Eastern Europe and decided their political and economic aspects. These countries were put under the communistic carpet and isolated from the western world. This is known as the "Iron Curtain". To control that all of these satellite states were following the same communist system as the Soviet, Stalin set up the Cominform which all the countries were forced to join. This was an attempt to gain and hold ultimate control of all the puppet states, something the Soviet actually managed to by using force throughout the cold war. ...read more.

Middle

This was interpreted by all the satellite states as though the new Soviet leadership would allow them a looser line of politics. To a certain extent this was given to them with the abolishment of the Cominform, but still Khrushchev held on to his role as supreme ruler over his satellite states. The continuation of economic stagnation, lack of consumer goods, and increasing public discontent due to centralised and inefficient economy, did not move the Soviet away from their normal policies. It did however, lead to revolts in the satellites. These revolts and clear signs of opposition from the satellites could be seen as coming into reality because of lack of control from Russia, but I think that the fact that none of the countries ever were let loose throughout the cold war period shows that Russia had good control. No matter how nationalistic, revolting, or dissatisfied the satellites were with being under "Moscow communism" rule. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1989 Russia gave up its sovereignty over the satellites, this was due to the beginning of modernisation and Russia falling behind in the arms race with USA. They simply could not hold up the control because of economical problems. Gorbachev saw the necessity of letting the east-bloc countries free so they could focus on economical growth. I think the answer to the title question is no, even though there were periods of revolt in all the satellites, none of them broke out or were allowed to have their own policies. There is only one exception to this; it is the incident in which the Soviet installed Gomulka as president of Poland. The enforcement of "Moscow communism" in the satellites was not a success anywhere and there was public discontent throughout the cold war, but still the fear and threat of military intervention assured the Soviet control. Even though their control was in a way superficial because it was based on military threats, it was still control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    need to have concessions that would give the appearance, at least, of implementing the Atlantic Charter. The same basic dilemmas, of course, occurred with regard to the structure of postwar governments in all of Eastern Europe. As early as 1943, Roosevelt had made clear to Stalin at Tehran that he

  2. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    By 1955, both Bulganin and Malenkov were in a far less strong position than Khrushchev, who emergence as supreme leader was finally completed in February 1957, although it was all but assured at the time of the Twentieth Party congress in February 1956.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    peasants to sell a portion of their crops for their own profit. Both policies were aimed at improving efficiency and modernising the economy by removing the Stalinist emphasis on central planning and encouraging both peasants and managers to do things on their own initiative and not expect to be always waiting around for orders.

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    To what extent was Stalin involved in the Terror? * There is no doubt that Stalin was closely involved in setting the Terror in progress, or in key decisions about the Show Trials. * He personally signed the death warrants for thousands of the victims. He also made the key speech in March 1939 at the Party Congress that brought the full force of the Terror to an end.

  1. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    However, the speedy resolution of the Iraq conflict caused oil prices to plunge further, exacerbating the economic problems that the SU faced during the Western recession of 1990. The Soviet Union was not overthrown by people's power in terms of a revolution, not by strikes, large-scale anti-government demonstrations, unlike in the Baltic states, Czechoslovakia, and Poland.

  2. How secure was the USSR’s control over E.Europe,1948-89?

    Many solidarity members are unhappy about this. They see it as gibing in to the government. May 1981 "Rural Solidarity" is set up as a farmers union. Sept. 1981 Lech Walesa elected chairman of Solidarity. The Solidarity Congress produce an "open letter" to workers of eastern Europe.

  1. Explain the effects that the decline of the Communist system had on any two ...

    The ban did not bring an end to Solidarity. The movement simply went underground, and the rebellious Poles organized their own civil society, separate from the Communist government and its edicts. In 1985, the assumption of power in the Soviet Union by a reformer, Mikhail Gorbachev, paved the way for political and economic reforms in East Central Europe.

  2. You Will Never Be Forgotten

    We must remember that the founders of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund who initiated the competition for the design of the memorial thought it would be a mistake for the panel of judges to be comprised of veterans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work