• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Would it be true to say that the soviet union never really controlled the satellite countries."

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Noah 3IBC "Would it be true to say that the soviet union never really controlled the satellite countries." After the end of the 2nd World War, the two great powers of the world USA and the Soviet had become the most important influence on the other countries in their hemisphere. In fact the Soviet was more than an influence on its neighbouring nations; it had control over 14 countries in Eastern Europe and decided their political and economic aspects. These countries were put under the communistic carpet and isolated from the western world. This is known as the "Iron Curtain". To control that all of these satellite states were following the same communist system as the Soviet, Stalin set up the Cominform which all the countries were forced to join. This was an attempt to gain and hold ultimate control of all the puppet states, something the Soviet actually managed to by using force throughout the cold war. ...read more.

Middle

This was interpreted by all the satellite states as though the new Soviet leadership would allow them a looser line of politics. To a certain extent this was given to them with the abolishment of the Cominform, but still Khrushchev held on to his role as supreme ruler over his satellite states. The continuation of economic stagnation, lack of consumer goods, and increasing public discontent due to centralised and inefficient economy, did not move the Soviet away from their normal policies. It did however, lead to revolts in the satellites. These revolts and clear signs of opposition from the satellites could be seen as coming into reality because of lack of control from Russia, but I think that the fact that none of the countries ever were let loose throughout the cold war period shows that Russia had good control. No matter how nationalistic, revolting, or dissatisfied the satellites were with being under "Moscow communism" rule. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1989 Russia gave up its sovereignty over the satellites, this was due to the beginning of modernisation and Russia falling behind in the arms race with USA. They simply could not hold up the control because of economical problems. Gorbachev saw the necessity of letting the east-bloc countries free so they could focus on economical growth. I think the answer to the title question is no, even though there were periods of revolt in all the satellites, none of them broke out or were allowed to have their own policies. There is only one exception to this; it is the incident in which the Soviet installed Gomulka as president of Poland. The enforcement of "Moscow communism" in the satellites was not a success anywhere and there was public discontent throughout the cold war, but still the fear and threat of military intervention assured the Soviet control. Even though their control was in a way superficial because it was based on military threats, it was still control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    Although Khrushchev's speech to congress on this subject had been intended to be kept secret, news of it had spread throughout Europe and to the US by the end of the month. The West viewed this denouncement of the purges and rehabilitation of the victims of Stalin and Beria as

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    It was almost a Civil War-type crusade to build socialism overnight. * There was great enthusiasm amongst many Party members who made huge sacrifices to build new towns and factories. * There were great achievements. But there was also muddle, confusion and waste.

  1. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    before the Eastern Europe revolutions, as nationalistic tendencies had already arisen prior to that. Second, the developments in Eastern Europe changed the mindsets of the Soviets in power and the Russian people. Similar to the situation in the other soviet republics, there was a breaking of the psychological barrier to the idea of a dissolved Soviet Union.

  2. Explain the effects that the decline of the Communist system had on any two ...

    The ban did not bring an end to Solidarity. The movement simply went underground, and the rebellious Poles organized their own civil society, separate from the Communist government and its edicts. In 1985, the assumption of power in the Soviet Union by a reformer, Mikhail Gorbachev, paved the way for political and economic reforms in East Central Europe.

  1. You Will Never Be Forgotten

    The passage itself is gradual, the descent to the origins low but it is at the origin that the meaning of this memorial is to be fully understood. At the intersection of these walls at the right side of the walls top is the carved date of the first death.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that he planned-in a very Machiavellian way-to use rhetoric and appearances as a means of disguising his true intention: to pursue a strategy of self-interest. It seems less clear that Truman had either the subtlety or the wish to follow a similarly Machiavellian course.

  1. How important were ideological differences in the split between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia ...

    Soviets believed it to be "a regime that was evolving towards socialism without a dictatorship of the proletariat."8 For Stalin, Yugoslavia was a thorn in his side, not only because it was a strategic part of Europe that he never managed to control militarily, but because Josip Broz Tito had

  2. Journalism - Two generations of the journalists - Soviet and the post-Soviet - make ...

    To clarify exactly what kind of labour activity is identified as profession we should turn to the terms professional, professionalization. Professional is "he/she who turned some occupation, activity into his/her profession, a good specialist ... hunter-professional, director-professional" (Dictionary of Russian Language ibid.).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work