• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what degree are electoral rules impartial and fair?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what degree are electoral rules impartial and fair? In order to establish to what degree electoral rules are impartial and fair we must first define what is meant by electoral rules, impartial and fair. Electoral rules are the rules that govern an electoral system. There are two main types of electoral systems, majoritarian and proportional representation. Majoritarian systems are ruled by the basic view of 'winner takes all' where as proportional representation systems are based on the principle of greater proportionally between the percentage of votes to the percentage of seats that each party receives. This is only a basic outline though, there are several different types of each system each with their own rules and outlines. The main majoritarian system as used in Britain is First Past the Post (FPTP). This is a simple plurality system that elects the leading candidate on a first and only ballot. Alternative Vote (AV) another majoritarian system is a preferential voting system where there are as many preferences as there are candidates. The votes are reallocated till leading MP has over 50% of the vote. The main proportional representation systems are the Single Transferable Vote (STV), which uses a preferential voting system that transfers the electorates' preferences using the droop formula. The Supplementary Vote (SV) system also uses a preferential voting system however the voters are only given two preferences. ...read more.

Middle

thus the winning political party does not have to negotiate with smaller parties who were not given the authority and legitimacy to rule the country or implement their own programs. The Political Party in power is then also accountable for its own actions and thus can be removed by the electorate at the next election if they so wish to do so. As was such the case in 1979 with Callaghan's Labour Government and again in 1997 with Major's Conservative Government. Majoritarian systems also stop extremist parties such as the Rock and Roll Loony Party from being voted into Parliament, as they lack the concentrated support that is needed for a candidate to win in a constituency. The ministers themselves also are more independent from their party and therefore can act on their constituency's behalf rather than the party's behalf as unlike the Closed Party System the minister's nomination into parliament is not determined by the party. This therefore leads to a stronger link between an MP and his constituency thus making the MP accountable to his constituency. For example, in 1997 Michael Portillo lost the Enfield South Gate seat. Another advantage, which can be seen as part of the desirability of using such systems, is that FPTP is a simple straightforward electoral system, which the majority of people can understand, especially as it has been in use for a number of years. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example in the Scottish Parliament elections of 1999 the Conservatives received 14% of the vote and 15.5 % of the votes under AMS. Had FPTP been used, however, the Conservatives would have failed to win any seats. The top-up MP's also means that more views can be represented in parliament and fewer of the electorate's votes are wasted. Another advantage of using PR systems is that, unlike with majoritarian systems, PR systems give representation to minor parties who do not have concentrated support. Fr example in the European Parliament election of 1999 the UK Independent party received two seats under the Closed Party List system where as in the previous election they had received none. Pluralism is thus, in this way, increased as more parties are represented giving a broader cross section of views. For example in the London Assembly elections of 2000 the Green Party received 12% of the seats. While it is possible under PR systems for one party to have a majority coalitions are usually generated and this can be considered a 'good thing'. This is because they mean a range of views are represented in government, while at the same time it gives minor parties experience in government and as over 50% of the electorate have voted for those in government it gives the government greater legitimacy and authority to rule. In February of 2000 a coalition was created between Labour and the Liberal Democrats for the Welsh Assembly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Information Systems and Communication section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Information Systems and Communication essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Database Coursework on a Vehicle Rental System: Analysis

    5 star(s)

    Rental Details The following details will be held in the rentals table: * Rental ID * Customer ID * Vehicle ID * Model * Daily Rental Price * Date Rented Out * Number of Days * Date Due Back * Total rental price * Anything else I feel is necessary

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Information Age

    3 star(s)

    think this website clearly meet the needs of the students as only the basic points are given here. Also the tests are really simple and are really easier in comparison to the level of the students so therefore might not help the students in relying on to this website only.

  1. What form of electoral system would you recommend for Parliamentary elections in the United ...

    Systems such as the Single Transferable Vote and most forms of PR allow for multi-member constituencies which may result in the weakening of any such relationships. Another advantage of the FPTP system is that under PR systems, there is more danger of smaller extreme parties becoming a force in parliament.

  1. Outline a case for and against electoral reform in the UK.

    they may get a more preferable outcome. This itself is another argument in favour of reform since it isn't democratic that people have to vote to keep someone else out rather than put the person they really want in. In a system where the electorate can have more than one

  2. Making Reference To Leading Alternative Systems, Critically Assess the Case For Electoral Reform In ...

    Proportional Representation systems with multi-member constituencies are the best way to overcome this problem, as discussed later. In 1997, the Labour manifesto pledged an independent commission on the UK voting system followed by a referendum to allow the public to decide which system of voting it wanted.

  1. Information: G061 - Systems and Communication

    can be changed to see the effect it has (effects can be gauged on the model rather than risking building the real thing)

  2. ict as level coursework

    Once this is clicked it should be taken to the stock user form where they can search quantities available of for a product 2 Check if 'back to main menu' button works. Click on the 'back to main menu' button.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work