A blatant disregard for human rights: Prison conditions in Egypt.

Authors Avatar

A Blatant Disregard for Human Rights:

Prison Conditions in Egypt

Jared Berney (329338)

Professor Bill Skidmore

TA: Sima Quadeer

Submitted: March 4, 2003

A Blatant Disregard for Human Rights: Prison Conditions in Egypt

Egypt: a country with a population of over 69 000 000 people, home to some of the worlds most fascinating structures (like the Pyramid’s and The Great Sphinx), and a main contributor to a good deal of the world’s trade industry (most notably petroleum products and cotton textiles) .  One would expect such an affluent country to be a nation thriving on high integrity and proper treatment of its citizens.  This is anything but the case.  In what has been referred to as “appalling”, “life-threatening” and a “filthy system”, the prison conditions in Egypt and the procedures that accompany it are testament to a true human rights violation and are in dangerous need of improvement.  From the moment an accused person is arrested until their last dying breath in prison, Egypt’s attention to such an important aspect of the legal system is a dismal display of a governments disregard for the lives of its citizens.   Throughout the course of this essay, the main factors that lead to this human rights violation will be explored (i.e. the process of arrest, interrogation, and living conditions).  On top of that, possible solutions to the problems will be presented to the reader in an attempt to bring light onto the grim situation that is the prison system in Egypt.  This essay is not an attempt to put down the Egyptian government for its total lack of careful treatment to those in prisons; it is intended to open eyes to a problem that appears to get less than enough attention. Whether or not the people in these prisons are guilty and worthy of poor treatment is a completely separate subject.  What is to be defined is that fact these people are humans regardless and the treatment they receive takes away from what are there human rights.  As people being held in a prison, they should be guaranteed the right to safety and a life free of harm within those walls.  Prison is intended to punish those who committed crimes, not ignite a needless fire in them that could lead to further crimes once they are released (if they ever are released, that is).  The prison conditions and practices that the Egypt legal system presents is not an effective method of rehabilitating people to the formidable citizens they once were as much as it is a general exhibit of contempt for those they see determine as being guilty and, more than anything, a blatant human rights violations.

The terror begins the minute the accused person is arrested.  Accompanied by soldiers from the Central Security Forces, the authorities in charge of the arrest awake the accused person during after-midnight hours in an attempt intimidate them and hopefully frighten them, thusly making less likely to fight back under such circumstances.  On top of that, the amount of authorities/soldier involved in the “attack” is a number far greater than is necessary for such a typical practice like arresting someone.  They violently invade every room of the house through different entrances, while another group is out hiding in the streets, corridors and other places in order to terrorize the accused.  Doors and windows are needlessly broken in order to enter the home.  While inside, the authorities seize whatever they feel necessary with no intention of returning them (even items like photo albums, which hold little relevance to the case). Verbal threats are directed at the family if they dare ask what is happening.  A physician who was arrested in 1989 recalls the events: “There was a knocking on my door at three in the morning.  I opened the door and found a large number of men in civilian clothes outside the door and on the stairs.  They entered and searched the entire house, giving no explanation or reasons”.  The above actions are a fitting representation of what the Egyptian legal system stands for – disrespect, intolerance, brutality, and severity.  All of the steps they take in arresting an accused person could be handled in a much more humanitarian fashion.  It only takes a couple of people to arrest someone and it would be much easier to arrest them during the day.  Instead of breaking into the home and tearing it apart, acting in a civil manner would more-or-less bring cooperation on behalf of the accused and, as a result, make the arrest go smoothly and quickly.  What’s even more alarming is what happens if the accused person isn’t home: the direct family members of the suspected criminal (including his/her children) will be subjected to extensive harassment and, if that doesn’t help the authorities find the accused, they will arrest all the family members and use them as hostages until the alleged criminal turns himself in.  In most everywhere, taking people hostage would be considered a criminal offence itself.  For the authorities to do this themselves is a clear message that the system they follow is flawed to point of being illegal.  As the whole paragraph dictates, the torture the accused people receive is not only within the prisons themselves, it starts long before that and is foreshadowing for all that will follow afterwards.  

Join now!

Upon arriving in prison, its inmates discover what is such a vile living space that no one should be able to experience it (whether guilty of a crime or not).  What is immediately alarming is how overcrowded the cells are (even getting to point where one cell was housed by 147 men).  What’s even more alarming is that the fact a lot of the time the overcrowding problem was deliberate and not a result of too many prisoners.  A good amount of the time there will be an empty cell, which has obviously not been lived in for a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay