• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A contract by definition is an agreement between two parties by which both parties are bound by the

Extracts from this document...


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DEVISION) BETWEEN: ERIC POLLARD (APPELLANT) -AND- VIV WINDSOR (RESPONDENT) WRITTEN ARGUMENT - SENIOR RESPONDENT; ISI BACKGROUND Viv Windsor bought a local shop and a computer, Anxious to please the locals, put an advert in the local news paper on a Saturday, stating that she would sell luxury chocolate shortbread for �2.50 instead of the recommended retail price of �5. She also stated that anyone wanting the shortbread should email her or come to the shop. Eric pollard, the appellant saw the email at 4.30pm on Saturday and sent her email on the same day. She realised that evening that she was making lose so she decided to revoke the advert. She contacted the newspaper who published her revocation 9.am the next morning. The paper got delivered to Eric at 10.30am Viv checked her email at 10.35am, She replied stating that the discount was no longer available. Eric sued her for breach of contract. A GROUND OF APPEAL There was no contract between Viv and Eric since the notice in the paper was not an offer but an invitation to treat. ARGUEMENT A contract by definition is an agreement between two parties by which both parties are bound by the law and which can therefore be enforced in a court or other equivalent forum. The law of contract has been known to bring equality and fairness especially to consumers whom are said to be more disadvantaged than suppliers/ sellers. ...read more.


smoke ball 1893 which the judge ruled that there had been a breach of contract because the sellers of the smoke ball deposited a certain amount in the bank therefore having intentions to be legally bound. It is essential to note the differences between these two cases. Carlill V carbolic smoke ball was a unilateral offer being that there was consideration between the owners of the carbolic smoke ball company and whoever chooses to use the smoke ball in a certain way unlike the present case at hand where there was no consideration of any sort. Although Viv did put a statement of price on the shortbread it is important to establish the fact that a statement of price does not amount to an offer. The case of Gibson V Manchester City Council 1979 has set precedent in the sense that the council presented a statement of price to Gibson and asked him to complete a certain form which should be submitted. The court still ruled that this was not an offer but an invitation to treat even though there had been some sort of negotiation between the parties. The issue of differentiating an offer from an invitation to treat exists in case law and was established in the case of timothy V Simpson in order to create equity and following the idea that there is freedom to contract. ...read more.


First of all, in good faith she wanted to sell an item for a discount price hoping that this would be an invitation to consumers to come purchase the other items in her shop, but when she noticed that people were not interested in other items in the shop but the shortbread and she was thereby making a loss, she quickly revoked the advert. Furthermore, in Shuey V US..., (1875) a case which concerned the apprehension of a criminal but was latter revoked without the plaintiff's awareness. An authority was set for the fact that it is sufficient if the revocation is communicated using the same channel used to communicate the original offer and if this is done it is irrelevant if particular offerees did not see or know about the revocation although this is not an English case, the English case of Routledge V Grant (1828) which set an authority that an offer can be revoked provided it is communicated to the offeree. This would be applied if Eric had really believed that there was a contract in the first place. Since there was no consensus ad idem, the advert made by Viv falls under the shopping rules which states that an advertisement on a newspaper is not an offer but an invitation to treat, there was no offer nor acceptance of any sort, it would be simply fraudulent for Eric to try and Force Viv into an un- existing contract and try to make her liable to prosecution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay in parts. But the fact that the student fails to address acceptance - central to understanding this problem question - means marks have been lost.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 18/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Thus, in this sense, a party who receives unrequested benefits is not legally compelled to return the favor as evidently, the other party has acted voluntarily. Therefore, promises made for something in the past is no consideration. Such a contract is not enforceable such as in the cases of Eastwood

  2. Postal Acceptance Rule

    Accordingly, the material date to be considered was the date of receipt by the defendant of the notice of exercise and not the date of posting by the plantiff. Since the defendant did not receive the notice until 21 December 1972, it was held that the option had not been validly exercised by the plantiff.

  1. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    Lord Herchell L.C in Henthorn v. Fraser6 said the acceptance is complete when it is posted. The same rule has been applied to telegrams in cases of Henkel v. Pape7, Cowan v. O'Connor8 and Bruner v.Moore9. An offer cannot be accepted after it has been rejected [Hyde v.

  2. Law of Contract - Question and answer.

    The offer cannot be vague or indefinite; it must be precise and express a clear intent to contract. The use of the terms 'wondered' and 'whether' in describing David's 'proposal', implies vagueness and lacks clarity. In his supposed offer, David fails to be sufficiently definite in his terms suggesting that there was no clear intent to contract.

  1. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    a rejection of the original offer and be a counter offer as was held in the case of Hyde v. Wrench 1840, where a defendant offered to sell his farm to the plaintiff's for �1000, which the plaintiff responded to by offering to buy it for �950, which the defendant's

  2. Critically evaluate what in law will amount to an offer

    This shows that an enquiry is not an acceptance as it is merely asking for information. For an offer to be legal it must be specific between 2 people as the case of Boulton V. Jones (1857) shows. As a foreman bought a business from the owner and a certain amount of lead piping was ordered.

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    However, there is some confusion whether the postal rule applies to modern methods of communication such as text messages, emails etc. This point of law is ambiguous because there is case law but it does not cover all points. As witnessed in Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Co. (1955)

  2. The impact of exclusion clauses on the consumer of goods and services in England ...

    Hence this can be very restricting in the impact of exclusion clause. A consumer can be aware of the exclusion clause but not be bound by it. Under this section a person cannot by reference, exclude liability for death or personal injury.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work