• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A contract by definition is an agreement between two parties by which both parties are bound by the

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DEVISION) BETWEEN: ERIC POLLARD (APPELLANT) -AND- VIV WINDSOR (RESPONDENT) WRITTEN ARGUMENT - SENIOR RESPONDENT; ISI BACKGROUND Viv Windsor bought a local shop and a computer, Anxious to please the locals, put an advert in the local news paper on a Saturday, stating that she would sell luxury chocolate shortbread for �2.50 instead of the recommended retail price of �5. She also stated that anyone wanting the shortbread should email her or come to the shop. Eric pollard, the appellant saw the email at 4.30pm on Saturday and sent her email on the same day. She realised that evening that she was making lose so she decided to revoke the advert. She contacted the newspaper who published her revocation 9.am the next morning. The paper got delivered to Eric at 10.30am Viv checked her email at 10.35am, She replied stating that the discount was no longer available. Eric sued her for breach of contract. A GROUND OF APPEAL There was no contract between Viv and Eric since the notice in the paper was not an offer but an invitation to treat. ARGUEMENT A contract by definition is an agreement between two parties by which both parties are bound by the law and which can therefore be enforced in a court or other equivalent forum. The law of contract has been known to bring equality and fairness especially to consumers whom are said to be more disadvantaged than suppliers/ sellers. ...read more.

Middle

smoke ball 1893 which the judge ruled that there had been a breach of contract because the sellers of the smoke ball deposited a certain amount in the bank therefore having intentions to be legally bound. It is essential to note the differences between these two cases. Carlill V carbolic smoke ball was a unilateral offer being that there was consideration between the owners of the carbolic smoke ball company and whoever chooses to use the smoke ball in a certain way unlike the present case at hand where there was no consideration of any sort. Although Viv did put a statement of price on the shortbread it is important to establish the fact that a statement of price does not amount to an offer. The case of Gibson V Manchester City Council 1979 has set precedent in the sense that the council presented a statement of price to Gibson and asked him to complete a certain form which should be submitted. The court still ruled that this was not an offer but an invitation to treat even though there had been some sort of negotiation between the parties. The issue of differentiating an offer from an invitation to treat exists in case law and was established in the case of timothy V Simpson in order to create equity and following the idea that there is freedom to contract. ...read more.

Conclusion

First of all, in good faith she wanted to sell an item for a discount price hoping that this would be an invitation to consumers to come purchase the other items in her shop, but when she noticed that people were not interested in other items in the shop but the shortbread and she was thereby making a loss, she quickly revoked the advert. Furthermore, in Shuey V US..., (1875) a case which concerned the apprehension of a criminal but was latter revoked without the plaintiff's awareness. An authority was set for the fact that it is sufficient if the revocation is communicated using the same channel used to communicate the original offer and if this is done it is irrelevant if particular offerees did not see or know about the revocation although this is not an English case, the English case of Routledge V Grant (1828) which set an authority that an offer can be revoked provided it is communicated to the offeree. This would be applied if Eric had really believed that there was a contract in the first place. Since there was no consensus ad idem, the advert made by Viv falls under the shopping rules which states that an advertisement on a newspaper is not an offer but an invitation to treat, there was no offer nor acceptance of any sort, it would be simply fraudulent for Eric to try and Force Viv into an un- existing contract and try to make her liable to prosecution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

A good essay in parts. But the fact that the student fails to address acceptance - central to understanding this problem question - means marks have been lost.

3 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 18/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Acceptance.

    4 star(s)

    The 'battle of the forms' occurs when one party sends a form stating that the contract is on their standard terms of business, and the other party responds by returning their own form and stating that the contract is on their terms.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Severable Contracts. Many of the difficulties which may arise with partial or substantial performance, may be avoided if the court decides that the contract consists of a number of divisible or separate obligations. For example, take a contract for the delivery of 120 tons of wheat for �12,000 to be delivered 10 tons per month from January to December.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    (Edwards v Skyways Ltd.) This presumption can be rebutted by clear evidence of an opposite intention. (Rose & Frank v Crompton) Conversely, with social or domestic agreements, the presumption is that no intention to be legally bound attaches to the arrangement (Balfour v Balfour).

  2. Advising a Client : Contract Law

    it is proposed to proceed along the route of the 'fundamental misunderstanding'. The question must then be asked whether the change in circumstances is sufficiently radical to warrant a finding of frustration. As the equipment in the contract is produced to unique specifications (as far as is known)

  1. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    In re Imperial Land Co. of Marseilles3, British and American Telegraph Co v. Colson4,do them In Household Fire Insurance Co. v. Grant5 was held that acceptance was complete when the letter of allotment was posted and it was irrelevant that it never arrived. Lord Herchell L.C in Henthorn v.

  2. Offers last forever unless expressly revoked. Critically evaluate this statement as it relates to ...

    Next, when an offer was made subject to a precondition and it was found that the condition was not what had been expressed in the offer, the offeree can refuse the offer as expressed in the case, Financings Ltd Stimson.

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    However, there is some confusion whether the postal rule applies to modern methods of communication such as text messages, emails etc. This point of law is ambiguous because there is case law but it does not cover all points. As witnessed in Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Co. (1955)

  2. Economic Loss & Negligent Misstatements questions and answers

    Sven would not be held liable for Erik, Matius or Annika losing money, because the report and advice he gave to Erik was just of a friend, and should not have been taken seriously 1. Friends - Chaudhry v Prabhakar [1988] ? there will be no duty in respect

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work