• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A critical evaluation of labelling theory. It is a common assumption in our society that the function of the criminal justice system is to punish wrong doers and dissuade them from repeating their actions. The result of this is that crime rates are reduced and criminals become rehabilitated back into society as good citizens. However one set of theorists that would contend this assumption strongly are labelling theorists. They believe instead that rather than diminishing criminal activity, the effect of the criminal justice system may have exactly the opposite result, by labelling offenders as 'ex-cons' or 'criminals' they may actually have the consequence of continuing and worsening the behaviour they aim to put a stop to. Labelling theorists argue that the criminal justice system can have a significant influence on causing deviant and criminal behaviour to continue. When people go through the justice system the very fact that they have now been given a label can result in their adherence to criminality, rather than curing them of the problem. Before labelling theory came into being, criminologists usually defined crime as 'behavior that violates criminal laws' (Lilly 2002: 106). However although this definition was useful in providing a rough guideline of what to look for when studying crime, it failed to take into account the many ways in which crime and criminality evolves over time, and the particular social circumstances that determine ...read more.

Middle

These stereotypes and false assumptions cause society to treat offenders differently, as if they have poor character (Lilly 2002: 112) or are likely to re-offend at any moment. This behaviour may seem sensible, as it is probably not a good idea to trust convicted thieves with your property, for example, however this type of treatment, according to labelling theorists, may precipitate the formation of the very type of criminal that people were afraid of in the first place. Becker suggests that this prophecy fulfilling process takes place by the negative label, such as 'criminal', 'junkie', 'rapist' becoming the individual's main method of public identification, to the exclusion of all other means. It is the 'master label' and secondary labels, which may even be positive, count for almost nothing. For example if someone is identified as being a 'father', a 'shopkeeper' a 'husband' and a 'murderer' it is perfectly obvious which label sticks in the mind of observers, even though this individual also owns a number of more positive labels they will tend be judged by the one negative 'master' label. (Becker 1963 in Lilly 2002: 112). The result of this labelling is that the individual will feel isolated from society and may turn to further offending as it may be their only option. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Sherman 1992 in Lilly 2002:115). All these critiques and empirical evidence seem to suggest that labelling theory still contains some holes. The mixed batch of results from some of the studies suggest that labelling theory does work in some cases falls short in others. The overall effect of labelling therefore still remains slightly unclear, possibly because researchers have not yet worked out the factors that determine crime levels in relation to state intervention via the criminal justice system. Further research would be invaluable to determine the full effect of other social factors on an individual's susceptibility to labelling, factors such as strength of bond to family and friends, social background and stage in criminal career. Once these have been studied in greater depth and further empirical evidence collected, it may be possible to make more general statements about labelling effects. (Lilly 2002: 115). Labelling theory attempts to deal with the extremely complex process of social reactions, and it appears that with more empirical evidence the effects of labelling could be better understood. There are certainly many other social factors that may be influential which labelling theory fails to take fully into account, and these may be very important in predicting which individuals will fall into criminal careers. It is likely that the criminal justice system and societal reaction do play a role in influencing this, however there are many other outside influences that also need to be taken into account when assessing this social phenomenon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    How could a movement favour liberation and agree that economic inequalities should be allowed to continue, though? Those two beliefs seem incompatible. Especially when given the fact that black people were themselves the primary victims of the inequality. Does not liberation carry with it a clear message of economic liberation in addition to the stated goal of racial liberation?

  2. Court Structure

    The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division). The judges in this court are the Lord Chief Justice, the Lord Justices of Appeal, and some High Court Judges. Usually three judges sit to hear an appeal, although there may be five in an important case.

  1. Criminal investigations and the criminal justice system

    of specialist services for ex-offenders including career advice, job search, training and work experience. Its my opinion that if their aim is to help these people stop re-offending in all this by tying to fit them in the society, its not far from believing that this part of the criminal

  2. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    Malcolm Klein (1995) defines a gang as a group that recognizes itself as a gang, is recognized by the community as a gang, and is committed to a criminal orientation. Gangs have all of the following features: * Contains more than two members who fall within a specific range of age (commonly, older than eleven and younger than twenty-five)

  1. Psychological research has lead to a better understanding of crime in society, the legal ...

    The self fulfilling prophecy is where an individual is labelled as a stereotype, and they then become that stereotype because they feel it is what is expected of them. "Smith and Mackie in 2000 define the self fulfilling prophecy as the process by which one person's expectations about another become reality by eliciting behaviours that confirm the expectations."

  2. "Examine why sexual offenders attract so much attention these days. How has the Criminal ...

    Attempts have been made to chart the shift from modernism to post-modernism, however this is largely attributed to the work of Ulrich Beck and what he describes as the emergence of a 'risk society' (Beck 1986). Beck argued that the public are constantly being "confronted with socially created risks which endanger survival" (Beck 1986, p32).

  1. Policing Using New Technologies

    or to reoffend, and as it has also played a vital role in the use as evidence in court cases something that has remained essential in proving almost exact evidence in many crimes, it also shows crimes committed when the shop or business owner isn?t present so they can be used for protection based purposes.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    If was explained in that if only one person in every million has a DNA profile that matches the one left at the crime scene and the defendant has a matching DNA profile then there is a million to one probability that the defendant left the crime scene and is guilty of the crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work