• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves to be punished just as much as a person who succeeds in committing an offence

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves to be punished just as much as a person who succeeds in committing an offence. The offence of attempt is the closest we get in the English legal system to satisfying the statement in question; however it is still the case that many defendants escape punishment because they didn't go far enough in attempting the crime, despite genuinely attempting to commit a criminal offence. In this essay I will analyse the existing law on attempts and conclude as to whether it is satisfactory. Attempt is an inchoate offence and is covered by the Criminal Attempts Act 1981. This act provides that "if with intent to commit an offence to which this section applies, a person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence; he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence". The criminal law does not punish people for just intending to commit an offence; intent is a mental quality that implies a purpose, whereas attempt implies an effort to carry that purpose or intent into execution. An attempt goes beyond preliminary planning and involves a move towards the commission of the crime. The question as to where the defendant has gone before a merely preparatory act is unclear and open to differences in opinion. ...read more.

Middle

This role of sentencing will both benefit people who have committed an attempt or those with only the mens rea of the offence and have not gone far enough for the actions to be seen as more than preparatory. The question of whether an act is "more than merely preparatory" is a matter of fact and, in a trial on indictment, will be for the jury to decide. It seems that for some crimes, the defendant must go much further to completion of the act than for others and I believe that this needs clarifying in order to make the law fairer. For example Geddes, a man who was found in the boys' toilets equipped with a knife, tape and rope was found to have not committed attempted false imprisonment yet, R v Tosti and White who like Geddes were only found with the equipment needed to commit their crime of Burglary were found guilty. In committing an attempt the defendant has the mens rea for the complete offence and may be equally as dangerous. The academic Becker (1974) argues that whether an offence is actually committed or merely attempted, the same type of harm can be caused: disruption and social stability. One such example is in R v Gullefer where the defendant seeing that the dog that he had backed at the greyhound race was losing, jumped onto ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the House of Lords have since overruled their own decision in Shivpori where the defendant was arrested by customs officers and confessed that there was heroin in his luggage, however it was found that the substance was only vegetable leaves yet he was still convicted of an attempt. Now the only case in which impossibility can be a defence is if ther accused attempts to commit what they think is an offence, but which is actually not against the law such as in Taaffe. In conclusion I agree with the view in the question to a large extent. A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves to be punished just as much as a person who succeeds in committing an offence. A defendant who has committed an attempt is still morally wrong and possibly just as dangerous as if they had managed to complete the offence. I believe that the current position of the law in England on the sentencing of attempts for most cases sufficient however there should be a clearer line drawn between what is preparatory and what the part of the crime. The offender should face the maximum sentence for the completed offence and a judge should decide based on the merits of the case, the sentence appropriate for that defendant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    cover minor cuts; this means that the harm caused is not necessarily equivalent to GBH. In Ireland; Burstow, the House of Lords confirmed that psychiatric harm could amount to ABH (as decided in Constanza), but added that it could also constitute GBH in extreme cases.

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    past convictions of a similar kind, failure to respond to previous sentences, the seriousness of injuries inflicted, whether a weapon was used and if so what type of weapon, whether the offence was premeditated, whether the victim was particularly vulnerable.

  1. AS level Criminal Paper

    Lastly a state of fairs can consist were by you are in the wrong place at the wrong time however unjust these may seem. The law believe that in limited cases were a statue of affairs exists that is enough to convict them of a wrong doing as the actus

  2. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    Outline the aims of sentencing Explain the meaning of Bail and apply to ?. Outline the procedure the D will face prior to the trial (do it for triable either way) What if it was an indictable or summary offence? Outline the routes of appeal for each type of offence.

  1. Sources of the English Legal System and the Relationship between Legislation and Judicial ...

    Consequently, the mischief rule goes further than either of the other rules. The mischief rule allows for better analysis into the position of the statute in relation to the law taken as a whole and provides the court with more latitude in their creation of the statute.

  2. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    In order for there to be a search of your private propertythere must be a probable causefor issuing a warrant to authorize a search or arrest.The Fifth Amendment basically means the right to a fair trial. It also states that a person has the right to not speak.

  1. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    in 2004-5, and BCS crime levels were three times higher than the recorded crime levels, although most of it is not very serious; unreported crimes generally involve much lower levels of financial loss, damage, and injury than those reported to the police; in 2004-5, 71% of the comparable subset of

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    (which provide for different ways of committing the offence)." In Nina's case fraud by false representation, subsection 2(a) could be brought. There are a number of key elements that need to be examined in regards to Nina's false advertising. The actus reus is that the defendant must 'make a false

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work