• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A2 Law burglary question. Eddie may have committed the offence of Burglary.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Tajinder Singh Ranshi A2 Law ? Burglary Question Discuss The Criminal Liability of Eddie? Eddie may have committed the offence of Burglary. This is an offence under Section 9 of the Theft Act 1968. There are two types of Burglary, there is one under S9 (1) (a) and S9 (1) (b), but it appears the offence Eddie has committed in the scenario comes under S9 (1) (a). The Actus Reus for the offence is that Eddie entered the building or part of the building as a trespasser. The Mens Rea is that he must know he is trespassing or trespassing recklessly and then he must have the intent to steal, inflict gbh or do unlawful damage. The first element of the Actus Reus is entry. ...read more.

Middle

We then move onto building/ part of a building. There is no legal definition for a building but the case of B&S v Leathley gave us some clarity. It also showed us how wide the definition of building is. Looking at this case, the freezer unit was classed as a building due to the fact that it had steps and an electricity supply connected to it. The courts also said that anything with wheels on it will be classed as a vehicle unless it is inhabited by people only then it may be classed as a building. In the scenario it is clear that a house is a building as it is inhabited by the wealthy banker. The final element is trespassing. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is clear that Eddie realises he is trespassing as he climbs into the house through an upstairs window. By the way that he gets in it is clear that he is trespassing. Secondly we must consider what is stated in S9 (1) (a) of the Theft Act 1968. The defendant must enter a building or part of a building with the conditional intent to commit an ulterior offence which is given to us in S9 (2) of the Theft Act 1968. The ulterior offences are that the defendant must have the intent to steal, inflict GBH or cause unlawful damage. Linking this back in to the scenario question it is clear that Eddies intention is to steal property as he climbs into the house in the hope of finding something valuable which he can us for his own gain. If convicted of the Burglary Eddie is liable to face up to 14years in prison ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    There are several areas in which the law of murder is unsatisfactory, and is satisfactory. The first point is the fact that a defendant can be convicted of murder even though there is no intention to kill. Under the present law on murder, a defendant is guilty of murder if

  2. Law A2 unit 4 murder problem answer plan

    that whether an act is dangerous then means that it is likely to cause injury to another person. This is decided objectively - it must be an act that a sober and reasonable person would regard as dangerous, and would cause some harm.

  1. A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves ...

    The acts were more than merely preparatory to the commission of the intended offence and therefore he should be punished as if the package really contained the drugs. Lack of punishment for a genuine attempt to commit a criminal offence will in some cases give incentive and opportunity for the

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    For the defendant to be liable factual and legal causation must be proved. Factual causation is established by two things. Firstly, that but for the conduct of the defendant, the result of the offence would not have occurred as and when it did.

  1. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    Because of the decision of Burgess, he should have been allowed to either plead guilty to the offence, or use the defence of insanity. Instead, he successfully used the defence of non-insane automatism, which meant that the precedent in Burgess had not been followed.

  2. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    come as close to the commission of the substantive crime as attempt does. The offense imposes liability on the defendant for crime committed by co-conspirators. Conspiracy combines spoken words with an overt act but does not require the commission of the planned unlawful object.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work