• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A2 Law Robbery Case Study. Discuss the criminal liability of Dave

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Tajinder Singh Ranshi A2 Law ? Robbery Discuss the criminal liability of Dave Dave may have committed the offence of a robbery. This comes from Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968. The actus reus for this offence is the ar for a theft and the use or threat of force. We must then consider the 2 conditions before moving on to the mens rea. The mr for robbery is the same mr for a theft as well as the intention to use force to steal. The first stage which we look at is appropriation; this comes from section 3 of the Theft Act 1968. It is defined as assuming the right of the owner. In other words this is taking over one of the rights and using the item as your own. In the case of Pitham and Hehl it didn?t matter that the furniture was not physically removed from the owner?s house, by the defendants selling it they had assumed the owners? rights. We can further look at Morris we were told that if the defendant proved the assumption of any of the rights, then the owner of the goods can be prosecuted. ...read more.

Middle

The Court of Appeal held that the car could be regarded as 'property belonging to another' against the owner, since it was in the possession and control of the repairer. Once the ar for theft has been completed we then move on to force/ threat of force as seen in the cases of Robinson where there was no completed theft, therefore we couldn?t get a robbery and Corcoran and Anderton where the moment a theft was completed there was a robbery. Threat of Force has been used in the scenario as whilst the money is being loaded into the bag Dave screams ?Hurry up or I?ll use this gun?. In the case of B & R v DPP it was potentially a robbery as the victim didn?t need to fear force there just had to be a threat of force. The 2 conditions are linked to the use of force or threat of force. The first condition is whether force/ threat of force happened immediately before or during the incident. ...read more.

Conclusion

This can be linked back to the case as Dave robbed the money from the post office and then used it to his own disposal to go on the annual ski trip. Finally we move on to the intention to use force to steal. We must consider whether it was him aim or purpose to take the money from the post office. Looking back at the scenario we can establish that this was his aim and purpose and by doing so he would be able to go on the annual ski trip. If we use the case of Robinson we were told that if D had a genuine belief that he had a right in law to the money, then his actions were not dishonest under s2(1)(a) of the Theft Act 1968. If convicted of the robbery offence Dave could face a life sentence in prison. But if we are not able to establish a robbery then we are able to convict him of a theft offence under S7 of the Theft Act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    he had intention to cause grievous bodily harm and actually causes the victims death. In some of these cases the defendant may not even realise that death could occur. Yet he is just as guilty as the man who sets out to kill his victim intentionally.

  2. Discuss the Criminal Liability of Dave for the murder of Edward

    Diminished responsibility is a four stage test. Firstly, it must be proved that the defendant suffered from an abnormality of mind, described in Byrne as so different from a normal mind that a reasonable person would term it abnormal. Dave may be argued to have an abnormality of mind, shown

  1. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    There are three different types of mens rea. Firstly, direct intention where the result was the defendants aim or desire. For example A shoots B because he wants to kill him. Secondly, indirect intention where the accused did not desire a particular result but, in acting as he or she did, realised to the point of virtual certainty that it might occur.

  2. Explain what is meant by the term causation in criminal law and assess how ...

    has brittle bones. It is commonly known as the ?eggshell skull? principle. In the case Mamote- Kulang the principle was again used with regard to an existing physiological condition. The principle has been extended to religious beliefs (Blaue) in the case Blaue had stabbed a women for not having sex with him.

  1. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    However, there is a problem with the Thin Skull Rule as to what exactly is a mental or physical abnormality. For example, in Blaue, the victim refusing a blood transfusion on religious grounds was enough to make the defendant liable for her death through the Thin Skull Rule.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    The trial judge amounted this amounted to a plea of insanity, at which point she pleaded guilty. From the definition given by the dictionary, it would appear that the defendant in this case suffered from a defect of reason, since she had no motive for taking the mincemeat, as she didn?t want it.

  1. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    guilt and the third was by far the worse crime that humans were capable of committing against the law of nature. Justifiable homicide is killing under circumstances of necessity or duty without any evil intent; for example state executions. Excusable homicide occurs when one kills another by mistake or in self-defense.

  2. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    The BCS is useful in relation to the Criminal Statistics by not only acting as a supplement by helping to remedy some of the gaps in official statistics, but also in providing a useful check as either a confirmation or modification of views derived from the Criminal Statistics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work