• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advantages of the jury system

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Advantages of jury A jury is used in the Crown Court only when the Defendant pleads not guilty. The jury plays three roles in criminal cases which are : Spilt Function: In this the trial is overseen by the judge and the jury, there functions are divided as the judge looks over and decides the points of law and the jury decides the fact.At the end the judge has the power to exonerate the defendant if its decided by him.This is generally called direct acquittal and is applied on 10 % of the cases.If the trial is to continue the judge may order the jury to consider the guilt and innocence of the defendant in a private room and make decision for athe accused in secret.The judge may or may not agree to the juries verdict but must accept it any way and juries do not give any explainations for their decision. ...read more.

Middle

This function is applied to lower the fear of jury 'nobbling',i. e juries may be sometimes bribed from the side of the victim to be proved not guilty,it was found that i the method including jury trial many of the defendants were given aquittal which could in some cases be jury 'nobbling'. Secrecy: The jury discussion is done in a private room in secret and hence there can be no inquiry or argument as to why or how has it reached a certain verdict.Under the section 8 of Contempt of court act 1981, if anyone makes a disclosure of any statement or argument happened inside the room ,it will be a criminal offence.This section was brought because many newsapers were ready to pay the jurors for the story behind their verdict. ...read more.

Conclusion

to come to a final verdict, they are n't even asked for reasons for their verdict and it is possible for them to decide case on the idea of 'fairness' ,this is sometimes referred to as jury equity. The open system of jury is a big advantage as the public is involved in the process justice is seen to be done.As the jury takes place in the jury room no one can interfere in the process.They don't need to give explainations for their verdict . The jury is free from all the pressure of the public in their discussion they are protected from other outside influences when they decide the verdict,in this way the jury can bring out unpopular verdicts with the public and jurors have the freedom to ignore the strict letter of the law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describing the Rules and Aids to Statute interpretation. Including Advantages and Disadvantages.

    4 star(s)

    In the Re Sigsworth case the defendant had murdered his mother and was set to inherit her state as he was her next of kin by being her 'issue'. The problem was that is was grossly unfair that the defendant should profit from his crime and so the court applied

  2. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    The symbolic function of the jury is key to legitimising the criminal justice system - it keeps the state from having an absolute power over the actions of its citizens and ensures a confidence in the adversarial system of justice (Sanders, 1997:1051, Sanders & Young, 2000:559).

  1. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    This has particular resonance when one considers the background of magistrates, which continues to be largely white and middle-class. This point however valid is for some, a bitter pill to swallow. Jury selection is seen to be biased and unrepresentative of the whole community.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    5 of the Juries Act 1974 to challenge to the whole jury on the basis that it has been chosen in an unrepresentative or biased way. For example In 1987 R v Fraser the defendant was of an ethnic minority background, but all the jurors were white.

  1. Trial by jury is more than an instrument of justice and more than one ...

    One such case is R v Mirza, where the defendant was a Pakistani who lived in UK in 1998. In this case, the conviction was quashed because the jury has developed a theory claiming that the use of an interpretation was a 'ploy'.

  2. Description of the jury system

    Although jury service is mandatory, there are few groups of people who are entitled to be excused. Also governed under section 1 of the Juries Act 1974 as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988, people between the ages of 65 and 69 may be excused as they may suffer from lack of concentration.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    opinion on matters of human nature and behaviour within the limits of normality any more helpful than that of the jurors themselves; but there is a danger that they may think it does.? [10] This quote illustrates exactly how the jury can be made to believe that they should trust

  2. The English Court System

    as of right, but leave of the court is needed for other reasons. And if leave refused, convicted person may appeal to the Home Secretary, who has the power to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal. The House of Lords is the second chamber of the UK Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work